Albiglutide, dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, lixisenatide, orforglipron and semaglutide are glucagon-like peptide‑1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Research
27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA), has transformed the treatment landscape for type 2 diabetes and obesity due to its robust efficacy and wide-ranging therapeutic benefits. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), stroke, and depression, are marked by progressive neuronal dysfunction and loss, yet current treatments remain largely symptomatic with limited disease-modifying efficacy. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We identified 14 studies that were included in this synthesis. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus therapy has evolved over the years to now include a new class of therapeutics, semaglutide. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), initially approved for diabetes and obesity, are now under investigation for neuroprotective effects in a range of neurological disorders. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A recent phase III trial testing exendin-4 did not show an improvement, which may be linked to the lack of insulin desensitization in the study participants. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Semaglutide significantly improved motor coordination in rTg4510 mice on the pole test, though not rotarod endurance. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Tirzepatide could control postprandial hyperglycemia even in cases with diminished β-cell function. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
43/100
There is a steadily increasing global burden of neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) such as dementia, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), and movement disorders like Parkinson's disease (PD), which emphasizes the importance of disease-modifying therapy (as opposed to symptomatic therapy). 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The last two decades have proffered many remarkable choices in managing type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
While mitochondria provide critical energy resources, mitochondrial dysfunction can lead to both metabolic and neurodegenerative disorders. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
With this notice, the Internation Journal of Molecular Sciences Editorial Office states their awareness of the concerns regarding the integrity of a number of the figures published within this publication [...]. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is a cerebrovascular disorder characterized by the accumulation of amyloid-beta (Aβ) in the walls of cerebral vessels. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
43/100
Seizures in people with Alzheimer's disease are increasingly recognized to worsen disease burden and accelerate functional decline. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Microglial phagocytosis is a highly energy-consuming process that plays critical roles in clearing neurotoxic amyloid-β (Aβ) in Alzheimer's disease (AD). 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The funding showed that APP/PS1 mice have learning and memory impairment, and the glymphatic system is dysfunction. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The Personalized Multi-Domain Digital Platform for Dementia Prevention (PM(DP)*2) is a conceptualized evidence-based initiative designed to reduce dementia burden through tailored interventions. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a critical structure for maintaining homeostasis in the central nervous system, and its dysfunction is widely implicated in the pathogenesis and progression of various neurological disorders. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Chronic diseases, broadly defined as long-duration conditions that require sustained medical care and/or limit activities of daily living, are a major problem that threatens human health and imposes large social and economic burdens. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Obstructive sleep apnea is one of the most common sleep disorders. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
43/100
Alzheimer's disease (AD) and age-related macular degeneration (AMD) represent the leading causes of dementia and vision impairment in the elderly, respectively. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Several studies have been done to investigate the role of hearing loss (HL) in cognitive decline. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Social connectedness is important for maintaining cognitive function and cognitive health in older age. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We respond to the commentary by Ballenger et al. While appreciating "our provocative article", they called for "a more rigorous historical approach…". 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Where “Free full text” comes from
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →