Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Find studies

A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.

We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.

Although Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and glioblastoma (GBM) share common aging-related risk factors, they lead to opposite cellular fates—neurodegeneration versus uncontrolled proliferation. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

CEP-IP with CMRF in SEA-AD Microglia: A Mitochondrial Co-expression Module Linked to Cognition

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-10-27

Single-nucleus RNA-seq (snRNA-seq) studies of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) routinely filter nuclei by mitochondrial percentage (%MT) or remove mitochondrial genes, yet whether these reads carry information about cognition is rarely examined. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

This structural configuration shields the scaffold from calpain-mediated cleavage, reconfiguring FLNA into an active motility engine driving invasive lamellipodia but stalls proteolytic processing and forces an absolute loss of the nuclear FLNA-90 tumor-suppressor brake, unleashing uninhibited c-Myc oncogenic transcription. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

Integrated Transcriptomic and Structural Prioritization of Sulforaphane Targets in Neurodegeneration: A Multi-Dataset In Silico Study

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-10-25

Sulforaphane (SFN), a natural isothiocyanate from cruciferous vegetables, exerts neuroprotective effects through mechanisms extending beyond canonical Nrf2/ARE activation. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

CausalDiffChem: Causal Network Restoration for Therapeutic Prioritization and Repurposing Across Diseases

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Research Square 2026-10-26

Computational drug repurposing commonly relies on transcriptomic signature matching to identify compounds that reverse disease-associated gene expression, but such approaches do not distinguish putative causal drivers from downstream consequences of disease. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

RNA-sequencing of butyrate-treated human lymphoblastoid cell lines shows dysregulated genes of multiple disease-related pathways

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-10-24

Butyrate, a 4-carbon fatty acid produced from insoluble starch by the gut microbiome, plays key roles in mitochondrial respiration, activation of cell-surface G-protein-coupled receptors, and protein acetylation by inhibiting histone deacetylases (HDACs). 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

Parental history of dementia is a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease, although the mechanisms underlying this association remain poorly understood. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

[ 18 F]Tauvid and [ 18 F]MK6240 capture largely overlapping patterns of tau pathology, but differ notably in the magnitude of off-target binding. 3 key findings →

Participants: 681 Evidence: moderate

Tau-CTFP: A connectome-informed continuous-time first-passage model for forecasting the onset of regional tau PET abnormality

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-10-30

Tau PET burden is associated with subsequent cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease, motivating forecasts for monitoring and studies of spatially targeted therapies. 3 key findings →

Participants: 168 Evidence: low

PVeD reproducibly contextualized associations between plasma pTau217 and PET-defined Alzheimer pathology across cohorts with different participant composition, pTau217 assays, PET tracers, and cognitive measures. 2 key findings →

Participants: 602 Evidence: low

Clinical expression beyond measured Alzheimer disease molecular pathology: a discovery and external evaluation study

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Research Square 2026-08-31

A prespecified structure–reserve–glial profile captured reproducible cognitive variation beyond measured Alzheimer disease molecular pathology across two cohorts. 1 key finding →

Design: longitudinal study Participants: 436 Evidence: moderate

Complement-mediated neuroinflammation has been implicated in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but its role during the pre-symptomatic phase of the disease remains unclear. 4 key findings →

Participants: 708 Evidence: moderate

Amyloid-β and tau, pathological hallmarks of AD, silently accumulate years before clinical symptoms’ onset and are associated with neuronal dysfunction and cognitive impairment. 3 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate

Estimating amyloid-β deposition using brain perfusion SPECT in Alzheimer's disease

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Research Square 2026-08-19

Brain perfusion SPECT revealed AD-typical hypoperfusion patterns and demonstrated modest potential to estimate the presence or absence of Aβ deposition with left parietal rCBF. 5 key findings →

Participants: 88 Evidence: low

Amyloid-Tau PET Fusion Reveals Covarying Network Territories Linked to Disease Stage, Cognition, and APOE4 in Alzheimer’s Disease

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-08-17

Ninety-six non-artifactual Amyloid-Tau components were identified, of which 73 showed appreciable spatial correspondence between their paired Amyloid and Tau maps, while 17 were Tau-localized and 6 Amyloid-localized. 2 key findings →

Participants: 320 Evidence: low

Mapping Amyloid-PET Uptake in the White Matter in Alzheimer’s Disease

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Research Square 2026-08-07

This study investigated whether WM measures derived from amyloid-PET are associated with AD biomarkers and to determine whether they offer added diagnostic and prognostic value beyond established biomarkers. 5 key findings →

Participants: 320 Evidence: low

Biomarker-Informed Interpretation of Dyadic Cognitive Function Index Scores in Cognitively Unimpaired Older Adults

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-07-30

Amyloid regional extent and tau PET were associated with different features of dyadic CFI data: reporter balance and CFI burden across reporters, respectively. 4 key findings →

Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,686 Evidence: moderate

↑ Change the filters

Where “Free full text” comes from

Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read

How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped

This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.

  • Journal tier up to 10 pts
  • Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
  • Study design up to 12 pts
  • Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
  • Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
  • How recent up to 5 pts
  • Sample size up to 4 pts
  • Effect reported up to 3 pts
  • Studied in people up to 3 pts
  • Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
  • Times cited up to 7 pts
  • Citations per year up to 5 pts
  • Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
  • Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
  • Still being cited up to 4 pts
  • Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
  • Institution's track record up to 3 pts
  • Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
  • Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
  • Free to read up to 2 pts

Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.

Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.

We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.

The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.

See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.

What this library is — and isn't

This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.

1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.

See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →

Newest studies, as a dated timeline →    Atom feed