Inner retina in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) may experience neuroinflammation resulting in atrophy. 3 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 15 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Research
28,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
62/100
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) neurofilament light (NFL) is a marker of axonal degeneration. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 144 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Blood-based biomarkers of AD/ADRD are influenced by common demographic and clinical characteristics. 2 key findings →
Participants: 779 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
After adjusting for age, sex, and the apolipoprotein E ( APOE ) alleles, compared to the CN group, the plasma t-tau, and NfL were significantly increased in the AD group ( p < 0.01, Bonferroni correction). 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 277 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Our results show that the measurement of p-Tau181 in plasma has great potential as a non-invasive prognostic screening tool for implementation in a clinical setting. 5 key findings →
Participants: 138 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
62/100
Our findings indicate that the high plasma AβO level could serve as a potential surrogate biomarker of severe SCD and the presence of brain Aβ deposition in individuals with normal objective cognition. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 126 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a crucial starting point in disease management. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Researchers at the University of Pittsburgh developed a new plasma p-tau217 test (using a different antibody than existing commercial tests) and validated it in 363 people, including some with genetic early-onset Alzheimer's mutations and community-dwelling older adults. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 363 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Analyzing postmortem brain pathology from over 3,200 people plus biomarker data from more than 10,000 more, researchers found that people who inherit two copies of the APOE4 gene variant (about 2-3% of the population) develop Alzheimer's brain changes almost universally and on a predictable timeline starting around age 55, much like known single-gene forms of Alzheimer's. The authors argue this makes APOE4 homozygosity itself a genetic form of Alzheimer's disease rather than just a risk factor. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This JAMA clinical review synthesizes cohort studies and meta-analyses to give physicians practical guidance on recognizing, assessing, and treating caregiver burden. 4 key findings →
Design: systematic-review Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
61/100
This Dutch cohort study compared dementia rates in two groups of older adults enrolled ten years apart. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 7,496 Evidence: preliminary
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
61/100
This modeling study projects that the financial toll of Alzheimer's and related dementias will grow very unevenly by race and ethnicity in the US. 4 key findings →
Design: modelling Participants: 31,028 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This study asked whether the genes that raise Alzheimer's risk are the same genes that cause amyloid plaques to build up in the brain, and found they are not quite the same thing. 5 key findings →
Design: case-control Participants: 770 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A simple blood test for GFAP, a protein released by activated star-shaped brain support cells called astrocytes, could identify which patients with mild memory problems had underlying Alzheimer's pathology and predict, years in advance, who would go on to develop Alzheimer's dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 160 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Highlights Brexpiprazole treatment for 10 weeks improved agitation in Alzheimer's dementia. 2 key findings →
Design: phase-3-trial Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Neither targeted lecanemab treatment nor treatment unrestricted by APOE ε4 genotype is cost-effective vs SoC alone for patients with MCI or mild dementia due to AD. 2 key findings →
Design: modelling Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The use of conventional anti-dementia drugs is associated with a lower mortality in nursing home residents with dementia and should be widely used in this population. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 25,358 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
61/100
Individuals with cannabis use severe enough to require hospital-based care were at increased risk of a new dementia diagnosis compared with those with all-cause hospital-based care or the general population. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 6,086,794 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The overall age and sex standardized incidence decreased between 2015 and 2021 from 3.5% to 2.8%. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Given the inconsistent evidence regarding hearing aid use and reduced dementia risk, this study evaluates whether hearing aid use, particularly effective use, is associated with lower probable dementia risk among hearing-impaired older adults. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 61,089 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
APPLE-Tree has a high probability of being cost-effective for a 1-point NTB gain, a difference previously associated with a three-fold reduction in 5-year dementia risk. 3 key findings →
Design: RCT Participants: 746 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The results provide evidence for the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of extended nursing roles in dementia care, demonstrating that extended nursing roles reduce unmet needs and improve quality of life. 3 key findings →
Design: RCT Participants: 417 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Tau neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) in the presence of amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques are required for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and closely track with cognitive impairment, yet cognitively normal aged individuals frequently exhibit NFTs arising from tau seed accumulation. 3 key findings →
Design: case-control Participants: 38 Evidence: early
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A polygenic score (PGS) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) was derived recently from data on genome-wide significant loci in European ancestry populations. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
CSF biomarkers, including P-tau, T-tau, Aβ 42 , Aβ 40 , and NFL, support in vivo identification of AD neuropathology and correlate with FTLD neuropathology. 4 key findings →
Participants: 101 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Where “Free full text” comes from
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →