Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

What this timeline is, and is not

It is a summary of modelled, population-level estimates and real trials' own enrollment ages. It is not a promise about any individual. The Lancet Commission's 45% figure describes what might happen across an entire population if every one of 14 factors were eliminated everywhere — it says nothing about what will happen to one specific person who changes one habit. Most of the risk-factor evidence below is association from observational studies, not proof of cause and effect; that caveat applies throughout, even where it is not repeated on every line.

Nothing here is medical advice. Decisions about testing, medicines or major lifestyle change belong in a conversation with your own clinician.

How to read the labels: Measured counted, surveyed or written in law. Modelled estimate produced by a statistical model — an estimate, not a count. Basis not stated the source did not say which.

The life course, with real trials placed at the ages they enrolled

Early life, midlife and later-life bands follow the Lancet Commission's own cut-points (45 and 65). Each line below is one trial's actual enrollment age range, not a claim about when its intervention 'should' happen.

A human life course, banded into early life, midlife and later life, with real trials placed at the ages they enrolledAPI ADAD Colombia (PSEN1 carriers, crenezumab), ages 30–60; CRHCP (village-doctor-led hypertension control), ages 40+; SPRINT MIND (intensive blood-pressure control), ages 50+; Maintain Your Brain (online lifestyle coaching), ages 55–77; FINGER (multidomain lifestyle), ages 60–77; US POINTER (structured lifestyle), ages 60–79; ASPREE (daily low-dose aspirin), ages 70+; GEM (Ginkgo biloba), ages 75+.04565100Early lifeMidlifeLater lifeAPI ADAD Colombia (PSEN1 carriers, crenezumab) (ages 30–60) — no effectCRHCP (village-doctor-led hypertension control) (ages 40+) — workedSPRINT MIND (intensive blood-pressure control) (ages 50+) — mixedMaintain Your Brain (online lifestyle coaching) (ages 55–77) — workedFINGER (multidomain lifestyle) (ages 60–77) — workedUS POINTER (structured lifestyle) (ages 60–79) — mixedASPREE (daily low-dose aspirin) (ages 70+) — no effectGEM (Ginkgo biloba) (ages 75+) — no effect

This chart is wider than your screen — drag it sideways, or open the table underneath.

Trial age ranges are copied from each study's own reporting. 'Worked' / 'no effect' / 'mixed' / 'harmful' repeats that trial's own primary result, not a judgement about the whole strategy.
Every trial in this chart, as a table
TrialAges enrolledResult
API ADAD Colombia (PSEN1 carriers, crenezumab)30–60null
CRHCP (village-doctor-led hypertension control)40+positive
SPRINT MIND (intensive blood-pressure control)50+mixed
Maintain Your Brain (online lifestyle coaching)55–77positive
FINGER (multidomain lifestyle)60–77positive
US POINTER (structured lifestyle)60–79mixed
ASPREE (daily low-dose aspirin)70+null
GEM (Ginkgo biloba)75+null

Most of the individually modelled risk sits in midlife: 10 of the 14 Lancet Commission factors are assigned there, versus one in early life and three in later life. That is a genuine finding worth sitting with, not an accident of how this page is organised — but it is still a modelled, population-level pattern, not a schedule for any one person's life.

Pick a life stage

Early life — before about 45

Simple sum of the individually modelled shares for factors assigned to this stage: 4.5%. (Not how the Commission's combined 45% figure is calculated — factors overlap, so shares are not simply additive. Shown for orientation only.)

Risk factors active now

Less education

Modelled estimate Can be changed
4.5% of cases attributed to this factor (modelled)

Fewer years of formal education is linked to higher dementia risk, likely because education builds 'cognitive reserve' -- the brain's capacity to compensate for pathology. A Latin American meta-analysis of 31 studies found dementia prevalence of 21.4% in people with no education versus 9.9% in those with at least one year of schooling.

Source: Lancet Commission on dementia prevention, intervention, and care, 2024 report (Table 1) · 2024

Genetically-determined familial Alzheimer's (PSEN1, PSEN2 or APP mutations) is the one Alzheimer's story that truly starts in early life — deterministically, not as a raised probability. See the genetic risk section for what that does and does not mean.

Medicines and trials studied at this age

API ADAD Colombia Trial (crenezumab in PSEN1 E280A carriers) null

Who: cognitively unimpaired PSEN1 Glu280Ala (E280A) kindred members aged 30-60 in Medellin, Colombia; 85 crenezumab carriers, 84 placebo carriers, 83 placebo non-carriers; 63% women (ages 30-60)

What was tried: crenezumab (anti-amyloid-beta antibody) subcutaneous 300 mg then 720 mg every 2 weeks, later optional 60 mg/kg IV every 4 weeks, vs placebo, for 5-8 years in cognitively unimpaired mutation carriers; mutation non-carriers received placebo as a masked kindred control

What was found: API ADAD composite annualised change -1.10 (SE 0.29) crenezumab vs -1.43 (0.29) placebo, difference 0.33 (95% CI -0.48 to 1.13); FCSRT-CI -0.03 vs -0.04, difference 0.01 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.02)

Source: Tariot PN et al. Lancet Neurol 2026;25(2):147-159 · 2026 · PubMed 41579901 · doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(25)00426-0

DIAN-TU-001 (gantenerumab / solanezumab in dominantly inherited AD) null

Who: carriers of dominantly inherited AD mutations, asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic (CDR 0-1), within -15 to +10 years of estimated symptom onset; 52 gantenerumab, 52 solanezumab, 40 placebo (ages adults 15 years before to 10 years after estimated symptom onset (ages not given in abstract))

What was tried: gantenerumab (subcutaneous anti-aggregated-amyloid antibody) or solanezumab (IV anti-monomeric antibody) vs placebo, 3:1 per drug arm, 4-7 years, in asymptomatic and symptomatic autosomal-dominant mutation carriers

What was found: neither drug showed a beneficial effect on cognitive measures vs controls; solanezumab group showed greater cognitive decline on some measures; gantenerumab significantly reduced amyloid plaques, CSF total tau and p-tau181 and attenuated NfL increases

Source: Salloway S et al. Nat Med 2021;27(7):1187-1196 · 2021 · PubMed 34155411 · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01369-8

Midlife — roughly 45 to 65

Simple sum of the individually modelled shares for factors assigned to this stage: 31.4%. (Same caveat as above — not additive in the Commission's own combined figure.)

Risk factors active now

Hearing loss

Modelled estimate Can be changed
7% of cases attributed to this factor (modelled)

Untreated hearing loss is one of the single largest contributors to dementia risk in the Lancet Commission's model, plausibly via reduced auditory/cognitive stimulation and social withdrawal. Each additional category of hearing-loss severity raised risk by about 16% (95% CI 1.07-1.27) in the cited literature; hearing-aid use appears to partly offset the excess risk.

Source: Lancet Commission 2024 report (Table 1, new pooled meta-analysis of 6 cohorts, n=666,370) · 2024

Hypertension

Modelled estimate Can be changed
2.2% of cases attributed to this factor (modelled)

Midlife hypertension raises dementia risk, and treating it appears protective against cognitive decline and MCI. The flagship SPRINT MIND randomized trial found intensive blood-pressure control significantly reduced MCI but its dementia-specific endpoint narrowly missed statistical significance, likely because the trial was stopped early and underpowered for that outcome.

Source: Lancet Commission 2024 report (Table 1); Williamson et al., SPRINT MIND, JAMA 2019 · 2019

Smoking

Modelled estimate Can be changed
2.3% of cases attributed to this factor (modelled)

Current midlife smoking substantially raises dementia risk; former smokers show little to no excess risk, suggesting quitting reduces risk at essentially any age. The 2024 Lancet Commission reclassified smoking from a late-life to a midlife risk factor based on newer evidence.

Source: Lancet Commission 2024 report (Table 1); Zhong et al. meta-analysis, 37 studies · 2024

Obesity

Modelled estimate Can be changed
1.4% of cases attributed to this factor (modelled)

Midlife obesity raises dementia risk, but the relationship is complicated near the time of diagnosis: obesity measured within about 10 years of dementia onset can appear protective because of pre-diagnostic weight loss (reverse causation).

Source: Lancet Commission 2024 report (Table 1) · 2024

Depression

Modelled estimate Can be changed
3% of cases attributed to this factor (modelled)

Depression at any life stage is associated with raised dementia risk, with the largest relative risk seen for early/midlife-onset depression. Effectively treated depression (UK Biobank) was associated with a lower risk, HR 0.62 (95% CI 0.53-0.73), than untreated depression.

Source: Lancet Commission 2024 report (Table 1, new meta-analysis of 7 studies) · 2024

Physical inactivity

Modelled estimate Can be changed
2.4% of cases attributed to this factor (modelled)

Physical inactivity in midlife/later life raises dementia risk; conversely, maintaining an individually optimal activity level over decades was protective (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.97) compared with persistent inactivity in a cohort followed a median 24.5 years. See also the separate 'physical-activity' protective-factor entry.

Source: Lancet Commission 2024 report (Table 1) · 2024

Diabetes

Modelled estimate Can be changed
2.3% of cases attributed to this factor (modelled)

Diabetes diagnosed in midlife substantially raises dementia risk via vascular damage, CNS insulin resistance, and inflammation. The Commission explicitly classifies diabetes as a midlife risk factor and notes its effect is uncertain when onset occurs late in life.

Source: Lancet Commission 2024 report (Table 1) · 2024

Excessive alcohol consumption

Modelled estimate Can be changed
1% of cases attributed to this factor (modelled)

Heavy/excessive alcohol use in midlife raises dementia risk in a dose-dependent way; a South Korean cohort of nearly 4 million found cutting back from heavy to moderate drinking lowered risk (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86-0.99).

Source: Lancet Commission 2024 report (Table 1) · 2024

Traumatic brain injury

Modelled estimate Can be changed
2.9% of cases attributed to this factor (modelled)

A history of traumatic brain injury, including single mild concussions, measurably raises later dementia risk. Younger age at injury and male sex are associated with higher risk; contact-sport cohorts (e.g., professional soccer players) show elevated neurodegenerative-disease mortality.

Source: Lancet Commission 2024 report (Table 1) · 2024

High LDL cholesterol

Modelled estimate Can be changed
6.9% of cases attributed to this factor (modelled)

Elevated LDL cholesterol in midlife (not late life) is newly recognized (2024) as a dementia risk factor. Statin use was associated with lower dementia risk (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.75-0.86) versus untreated high cholesterol in a 36-cohort meta-analysis, though a Cochrane review of late-life statin RCTs found no benefit.

Source: Lancet Commission 2024 report (Table 1) · 2024

Medicines and trials studied at this age

SPRINT MIND mixed

Who: US/Puerto Rico ambulatory adults >=50 with hypertension and elevated cardiovascular risk, without diabetes or prior stroke; 102 sites (ages 50+ (mean 67.9))

What was tried: intensive antihypertensive treatment to systolic BP goal <120 mm Hg vs standard goal <140 mm Hg

What was found: probable dementia HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.67-1.04), 7.2 vs 8.6 per 1000 person-years (149 vs 176 cases) -- not significant; MCI HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.69-0.95), 14.6 vs 18.3 per 1000 PY; MCI or probable dementia HR 0.85 (95% CI 0.74-0.97), 20.2 vs 24.1 per 1000 PY

Source: SPRINT MIND Investigators (Williamson JD et al.) JAMA 2019;321(6):553-561 · 2019 · PubMed 30688979 · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.21442

CRHCP (China Rural Hypertension Control Project) dementia outcome positive

Who: adults >=40 with uncontrolled hypertension in 326 rural Chinese villages (163 intervention, 163 usual care) (ages 40+)

What was tried: non-physician community healthcare provider-led stepped-care antihypertensive titration to systolic <130 / diastolic <80 mm Hg (with physician supervision, home BP monitoring, health coaching) vs usual care; village-level cluster randomisation

What was found: all-cause dementia RR 0.85 (95% CI 0.76-0.95); net SBP reduction 22.0 mm Hg (95% CI 20.6-23.4), DBP reduction 9.3 mm Hg (95% CI 8.7-10.0); serious adverse events RR 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.98)

Source: He J et al. Nat Med 2025;31(6):2054-2061 · 2025 · PubMed 40258956 · doi:10.1038/s41591-025-03616-8

Maintain Your Brain (MYB) positive

Who: dementia-free community-dwelling Australians aged 55-77 with modifiable dementia risk factors (45 and Up Study cohort); 64% female (ages 55-77)

What was tried: 3-year online, personalised multidomain coaching in 2-4 modules targeting physical activity, nutrition, cognitive activity (computerised brain training) and depression/anxiety, vs control receiving module-eligible information only

What was found: change in z score 0.28 (95% CI 0.25-0.32) intervention vs 0.10 (95% CI 0.07-0.13) control; between-group difference 0.18 (95% CI 0.13-0.23)

Source: Brodaty H et al. Nat Med 2025;31(2):565-573 · 2025 · PubMed 39875685 · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03351-6

AHEAD 3-45 (lecanemab in preclinical AD) not yet reported

Who: cognitively unimpaired adults 55-80 with intermediate or elevated brain amyloid; plasma Abeta42/40 used to screen before PET; recruitment via TRC-PAD, ADNeT and J-TRC registries (ages 55-80)

What was tried: lecanemab (BAN2401) IV, dose regimens tailored to baseline amyloid: A3 (intermediate amyloid ~20-40 centiloids, phase 2, PET endpoints) and A45 (elevated amyloid >40 centiloids, phase 3, cognitive composite primary) vs placebo, 4-year treatment

Source: Rafii MS et al. Alzheimers Dement 2023;19(4):1227-1233 (design paper; epub Aug 2022) · 2023 · PubMed 35971310 · doi:10.1002/alz.12748

TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 3 (donanemab in preclinical AD) not yet reported

Who: adults 55-80 in the US and Japan with AD pathology detected by plasma p-tau217; 63,124 screened, 2196 enrolled (CDR-Global 0 n=1202; 0.5 n=664); mean baseline amyloid 63.2 centiloids (CDR 0) and 70.7 (CDR 0.5) (ages 55-80)

What was tried: donanemab IV monthly x9 infusions vs placebo, then clinical assessments every 6 months (decentralized design, plasma p-tau217 eligibility)

Source: Yaari R et al. Alzheimers Dement 2025;21(9):e70662 (screening and baseline paper) · 2025 · PubMed 40955720 · doi:10.1002/alz.70662

AHEAD 3-45 and TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 3 above are testing amyloid-targeting antibodies (lecanemab, donanemab) in cognitively unimpaired people ages 55–80 who have amyloid on a brain scan — a biomarker-selected, presymptomatic-prevention idea. This is not the approved use of either drug and neither trial has reported results yet.

Later life — 65 and older

Simple sum of the individually modelled shares for factors assigned to this stage: 9.4%. (Same caveat as above.) This is also when the great majority of Alzheimer's diagnoses actually happen — prevalence rises from about 5% at ages 65–74 to about 33% at 85+ (Alzheimer's Association, 2025 Facts and Figures), so it is the stage where symptomatic medicines, not just risk-factor control, become relevant.

Risk factors active now

Air pollution

Modelled estimate Can be changed
2.6% of cases attributed to this factor (modelled)

Long-term exposure to particulate air pollution, especially black carbon, raises dementia risk. Quasi-experimental evidence from air-quality improvement policies in France found a 12.2 ug/m3 reduction in PM2.5 was associated with lower dementia risk (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76-0.95), supporting a reversible, plausibly causal relationship.

Source: Lancet Commission 2024 report (Table 1) · 2024

Social isolation

Modelled estimate Can be changed
4.6% of cases attributed to this factor (modelled)

Infrequent social contact in later life raises dementia risk, plausibly through loss of cognitive stimulation and increased stress/inflammation. A related but distinct construct, loneliness, shows RR estimates of 1.26-1.58 across separate reviews.

Source: Lancet Commission 2024 report (Table 1) · 2024

Untreated vision loss

Modelled estimate Can be changed
2.2% of cases attributed to this factor (modelled)

Vision impairment -- much of it correctable -- was newly added as a dementia risk factor in the Lancet Commission's 2024 report. Cataract surgery specifically was associated with lower subsequent dementia risk (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62-0.83) versus unoperated cataracts, suggesting a genuinely modifiable pathway; diabetic retinopathy also raised risk (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.11-1.61), while glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration showed no significant association.

Source: Lancet Commission 2024 report (Table 1) · 2024

Risk-reduction trials studied at this age

FINGER positive

Who: Finnish community-dwelling at-risk older adults (CAIDE Dementia Risk Score >=6, cognition at mean or slightly lower than expected for age), recruited from national surveys (ages 60-77)

What was tried: multidomain lifestyle: diet + exercise + cognitive training + vascular risk monitoring, 2 years, vs general health advice control

What was found: between-group difference in change of NTB total Z score per year 0.022 (95% CI 0.002-0.042); mean 2-year change 0.20 intervention vs 0.16 control

Source: Ngandu T et al. Lancet 2015;385(9984):2255-63 · 2015 · PubMed 25771249 · doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60461-5

US POINTER mixed

Who: US older adults at risk of cognitive decline: sedentary lifestyle + suboptimal diet + >=2 of family history of memory impairment, cardiometabolic risk, race/ethnicity, older age, sex; 5 US sites (ages 60-79)

What was tried: structured high-intensity multidomain lifestyle (physical + cognitive activity, MIND-style healthy diet, social engagement, cardiovascular health monitoring; team-based with coaching and accountability) vs self-guided lower-intensity version of the same domains. NOTE: no no-intervention/usual-care control arm.

What was found: annual rate of increase 0.243 SD (95% CI 0.227-0.258) structured vs 0.213 SD (95% CI 0.198-0.229) self-guided; between-group difference 0.029 SD/year (95% CI 0.008-0.050)

Source: Baker LD et al. JAMA 2025;334(8):681-691 · 2025 · PubMed 40720610 · doi:10.1001/jama.2025.12923

ASPREE (dementia and cognition) null

Who: community-dwelling adults >=70 (US minorities >=65) in US and Australia, free of CVD, disability and dementia (ages 70+ (US minorities 65+))

What was tried: low-dose aspirin 100 mg daily vs placebo

What was found: dementia triggers HR 1.03 (95% CI 0.91-1.17); probable AD HR 0.96 (95% CI 0.74-1.24); MCI HR 1.12 (95% CI 0.92-1.37); cognitive change similar

Source: Ryan J et al. Neurology 2020;95(3):e320-e331 · 2020 · PubMed 32213642 · doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000009277

GEM (Ginkgo Evaluation of Memory) null

Who: community volunteers >=75 with normal cognition (n=2587) or MCI (n=482); 5 US academic centres; 2000-2008 (ages 75+)

What was tried: Ginkgo biloba extract 120 mg twice daily vs placebo

What was found: all-cause dementia HR 1.12 (95% CI 0.94-1.33), P=0.21 (3.3 vs 2.9 per 100 person-years); AD HR 1.16 (95% CI 0.97-1.39), P=0.11; MCI-to-dementia HR 1.13 (95% CI 0.85-1.50), P=0.39

Source: DeKosky ST et al. JAMA 2008;300(19):2253-62 · 2008 · PubMed 19017911 · doi:10.1001/jama.2008.683

Symptomatic medicines — for people already diagnosed, not for prevention

Donepezil (Aricept)

Mechanism: Reversible acetylcholinesterase inhibitor; increases synaptic acetylcholine availability

Approved for: mild, moderate, and severe AD

FDA approval: 1996-11-25

Pivotal-trial result: Symptomatic cognitive benefit vs placebo across pivotal trials; not disease-modifying

Rivastigmine (Exelon)

Mechanism: Reversible inhibitor of both acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase

Approved for: mild to moderate AD (also approved for Parkinson's disease dementia)

FDA approval: 2000-04-21

Pivotal-trial result: Symptomatic cognitive benefit vs placebo across pivotal trials; not disease-modifying

Galantamine (Razadyne)

Mechanism: Reversible acetylcholinesterase inhibitor and nicotinic receptor modulator

Approved for: mild to moderate AD

FDA approval: 2001-02-28

Pivotal-trial result: Symptomatic cognitive benefit vs placebo across pivotal trials; not disease-modifying

Memantine (Namenda)

Mechanism: Low-to-moderate affinity NMDA receptor antagonist; reduces excitotoxicity from excess glutamate signaling

Approved for: moderate to severe AD

FDA approval: 2003-10-16

Pivotal-trial result: Symptomatic cognitive/functional benefit vs placebo across pivotal trials; not disease-modifying

Lecanemab (Leqembi)

Mechanism: Humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively binds soluble amyloid-beta protofibrils, promoting their clearance

Approved for: early AD (MCI or mild dementia)

FDA approval: 2023-01-06

Pivotal-trial result: -0.45 point difference vs placebo, a 27% slowing of clinical decline (p<0.0001)

Donanemab (Kisunla)

Mechanism: Humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting pyroglutamate Aβ(p3-42), a form aggregated in amyloid plaques; clears existing plaque

Approved for: early symptomatic AD (MCI or mild dementia)

FDA approval: 2024-07-02

Pivotal-trial result: 35% slowing of decline vs placebo in low/medium tau population; 22% slowing in combined (overall) population

None of these drugs prevent Alzheimer's in someone who does not yet have it. Cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine treat symptoms without changing the underlying disease course; lecanemab and donanemab are approved specifically for early symptomatic disease (mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia) with confirmed amyloid pathology, and slow — not stop — further decline. See Treatments for full indications, side effects and costs.

Medicines and trials overview

Registered trials by drug mechanism

Interventional Alzheimer's trials on ClinicalTrials.gov with an identifiable drug mechanism (trials of non-drug interventions, diagnostics, and unclassified drugs are not shown).

Registered Alzheimer's clinical trials by drug mechanismSymptomatic: cholinesterase inhibitors, 332 trials; Anti-amyloid antibody, 99 trials; Anti-inflammatory, 25 trials; Gene therapy, 15 trials; GLP-1 receptor agonist, 13 trials; Anti-amyloid aggregation (small molecule), 11 trials; BACE inhibitor, 9 trials; Anti-tau antibody, 6 trials.050100150200250300350Symptomatic: cholinesterase inhibitors332Anti-amyloid antibody99Anti-inflammatory25Gene therapy15GLP-1 receptor agonist13Anti-amyloid aggregation (small molecule)11BACE inhibitor9Anti-tau antibody6

This chart is wider than your screen — drag it sideways, or open the table underneath.

n = 510 trials with a classified drug mechanism, out of 7816 total registered trials in our ClinicalTrials.gov catalogue. Cholinesterase inhibitors dominate by count because they have been studied since the 1990s; anti-amyloid antibodies are the newest and fastest-growing category.
Every number in this chart, as a table
MechanismRegistered trials
Symptomatic: cholinesterase inhibitors332
Anti-amyloid antibody99
Anti-inflammatory25
Gene therapy15
GLP-1 receptor agonist13
Anti-amyloid aggregation (small molecule)11
BACE inhibitor9
Anti-tau antibody6
The full ranking Risk factors, ranked → Every factor on this timeline, ranked by evidence strength, with genetic risk kept separate. The trial evidence Prevention → Full detail on every lifestyle trial mentioned above, including the ones that found nothing. Every medicine Treatments → Approved drugs, drugs in trials, and drugs that failed, with real indications and costs.

Where these numbers come from

Records behind this page
163
Distinct sources
106
Years covered
1997–2026
Basis
1 measured · 44 modelled · 118 not stated
Data collected
2026-09-21
Source files
risk_factors.json (41 KB, 31 rows), prevention_trials.json (205 KB, 109 rows), treatments.json (67 KB, 23 rows), trials.csv (3.8 MB, 7816 rows)

Most-cited sources on this page

What could make these numbers misleading

The life stage a trial or drug is placed in here is the age range that trial actually enrolled, or the disease stage a drug is actually indicated for -- not a claim about when someone 'should' start treatment. Amyloid-targeting antibodies are approved for early symptomatic disease (mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia with confirmed amyloid pathology), not for healthy people trying to prevent dementia; trials of that idea (AHEAD 3-45, TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 3) are still running and have not reported results.

Every figure on this page is read straight out of a file in our data folder; nothing is typed in by hand. You can download the raw data and check any row yourself. This is a summary of published research, not medical advice.