Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Every row

Showing 58 of 382 rows. One row per study per exposure: a study that tested two different things appears twice, once for each.

Scroll the table sideways to see every column.

Research and outcomes, 58 rows. Every row links to its source.
Exposure Question Direction Outcome measured Design People Effect size, as the source reported it Source
Population burden (prevalence, incidence, lifetime risk) All modifiable factors together Prevention No direction reported
why

A burden-of-disease decomposition: age-standardised rates rose slightly and population growth was the largest driver of the rise in cases. It compares no exposure, so no direction is recorded.

Global prevalence, incidence, mortality and DALYs of young-onset dementia, 1990-2021 modelling study not stated Global age standardized prevalence and incidence of dementia among people under 65 years increased from 93.39 and 16.24 per 100,000 persons in 1990 to 96.09 and 17.16 per 100,000 persons in 2021; mortality increased from 0.89 per 100,000 population to 0.91 per 100,000 population; and age standardized DALYs increased from 45.60 per 100,000 persons to 46.78 per 100,000 persons Translational Psychiatry 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39966345
Population burden (prevalence, incidence, lifetime risk) All modifiable factors together Prevention No direction reported
why

A lifetime-risk estimate (42% after age 55, higher in women, Black adults and APOE4 carriers) and a projection of new cases. It compares no exposure, so no direction is recorded.

Lifetime risk of dementia from age 55, and projected annual US incident cases to 2060 cohort study 15,043 The lifetime risk of dementia after age 55 years was 42% (95% confidence interval: 41-43). Rates were substantially higher in women, Black adults and APOE ε4 carriers, with lifetime risks ranging from approximately 45% to 60% in these populations. The number of US adults who will develop dementia each year was projected to increase from approximately 514,000 in 2020 to approximately 1 million in 2060 Nature Medicine 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39806070
Population burden (prevalence, incidence, lifetime risk) All modifiable factors together Prevention No direction reported
why

A pooled incidence and prevalence estimate with no exposure compared, so no direction is recorded.

Pooled incidence and prevalence of frontotemporal dementia meta-analysis not stated Pooled crude incidence for FTD was 2.28 (95% CI, 1.55-3.36) per 100 000 person-years and prevalence, 9.17 (95% CI, 3.59-23.42) per 100 000 people JAMA Neurology 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40920400
Population burden (prevalence, incidence, lifetime risk) All modifiable factors together Prevention No direction reported
why

A prevalence estimate and forecast: cases are projected to rise from 57.4 million to 152.8 million while age-standardised prevalence stays flat, with the rise attributed to population growth and ageing. It compares no exposure, so there is no direction to record.

Number of people with dementia worldwide, 2019 and forecast to 2050 modelling study not stated We estimated that the number of people with dementia would increase from 57·4 (95% uncertainty interval 50·4-65·1) million cases globally in 2019 to 152·8 (130·8-175·9) million cases in 2050. Despite large increases in the projected number of people living with dementia, age-standardised both-sex prevalence remained stable between 2019 and 2050 (global percentage change of 0·1% [-7·5 to 10·8]) The Lancet Public Health 2022
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 34998485
Population burden (prevalence, incidence, lifetime risk) All modifiable factors together Prevention No direction reported
why

A pooled prevalence estimate with no exposure compared, so there is no direction to record.

Global prevalence of young-onset dementia (ages 30-64) meta-analysis 2,760,379 Age-standardized prevalence estimates increased from 1.1 per 100 000 population in the group aged 30 to 34 years to 77.4 per 100 000 population in the group aged 60 to 64 years. This gives an overall global age-standardized prevalence of 119.0 per 100 000 population in the age range of 30 to 64 years, corresponding to 3.9 million people aged 30 to 64 years living with YOD in the world JAMA Neurology 2021
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 34279544
Sex and gender differences (research agenda) All modifiable factors together Prevention No direction reported
why

A position paper from an expert network. It sets out 12 priority research areas on sex and gender in Alzheimer's disease and reports no effect estimate.

None measured (research agenda) None not stated not established — position paper; the abstract reports no effect estimate. Alzheimer's & Dementia 2018
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 29907423
Amyloid PET Centiloid positivity threshold Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

A threshold-derivation meta-analysis: it converges on 18 Centiloids (data-driven) and 27 Centiloids (visual reads) and flags 11-26 as a range to read with caution. It compares no exposure, so no direction exists to record.

Centiloid cutoff for amyloid PET positivity (data-driven and by visual-read correspondence) meta-analysis 49,227 The data-driven GMM approach identified a bimodal distribution in 51 studies (n = 48 786), resulting in a single cutoff for positivity of 18 Centiloids (95% CI,16-19; I2 = 97%). The double-cutoff approach revealed high confidence for interpreting scans as negative when Centiloid values were lower than 11 (95% CI, 9-13; I2 = 95%) and interpreting scans as positive if Centiloid values were higher than 26 (95% CI, 24-28; I2 = 95%) ... Centiloids were highly predictive of visual positivity (Cohen κ, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.83-0.89; I2 = 96%) with a cutoff of 27 Centiloids (95% CI, 24-30; I2 = 80%) JAMA 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42441390
Amyloid and tau PET (appropriate use criteria) Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

Appropriate use criteria rated by consensus: for amyloid PET seven of 17 scenarios were rated appropriate, two uncertain and eight rarely appropriate; for tau PET five, six and six. No effect estimate is reported.

None measured (appropriate use criteria) systematic review not stated not established — consensus criteria; the abstract reports scenario ratings, not an effect estimate. Alzheimer's & Dementia 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39776249
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

An editorial reviewing the FDA clearance of the Lumipulse plasma ratio test. It relays performance figures from the FDA summary and other studies and reports no data of its own.

None measured (editorial on the FDA clearance) None not stated FDA approval was based on clinical evidence showing strong agreement between plasma test results and confirmation by PET or CSF testing, with over 90% consistency in those with positive findings. In contrast, these reference methods confirmed 97.3% of those with negative plasma results to be amyloid negative Annals of Medicine and Surgery 2026
⚠ Editorial — not peer-reviewed research PMID 41675863
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

A clinical practice guideline. It sets performance thresholds for blood tests (at least 90% sensitivity and 75% specificity for triage; at least 90% for both to substitute for amyloid PET or CSF) and reports no effect estimate of its own.

None measured (clinical practice guideline) systematic review not stated not established — guideline; recommendations rather than an effect estimate. Alzheimer's & Dementia 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40729527
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

A price-threshold model: it estimates the test price at which diagnostic cost per true-positive case equals standard care ($290-$1,950 depending on use), and compares no actual price against it, so there is no direction to record.

Value-based price of a blood test for AD pathology as a triage or confirmatory test in primary and specialty care, and projected reduction in PET/CSF use modelling study not stated If used in primary care, the value-based price would be $290 for a triage and $1150 for a confirmatory test, respectively, as use of PET or CSF testing would decline by 47 % and 86 %, respectively. If used in specialty care, i.e., after confirmation of early-stage cognitive impairment, the overall number of blood tests would decline. Consequently, the value-based price would increase to $450 for a triage test and $1950 for a confirmatory test Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40494736
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

A workgroup recommendations document. It sets target sensitivity and specificity for blood biomarker tests (≥90% / ≥85% for triage in primary care; ~90% / ~90% as a confirmatory test) and reports no data of its own.

None measured (performance recommendations) None not stated not established — recommendations document; the abstract states target performance thresholds, not an effect estimate. Nature Reviews Neurology 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38866966
Caregiving itself (exposure to the carer) Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

A pooled prevalence among carers (50.8% lonely, 37.1% socially isolated) with no non-carer comparison, so no direction for the effect of caregiving can be recorded.

Prevalence of loneliness and social isolation among informal carers meta-analysis 11,134 The pooled prevalence of loneliness among informal carers of individuals with dementia was 50.8% (95% CI: 41.8%-59.8%), while the pooled prevalence of social isolation was 37.1% (95% CI: 26.7%-47.6%) International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38752797
Cost of dementia care Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

A cost estimate ($818 billion, 80% of it borne by families through unpaid care, earnings losses, out-of-pocket costs and quality-of-life losses) with no exposure compared, so no direction is recorded.

Total cost of dementia in the United States in 2026 modelling study not stated In 2026, 5.7 million (95% confidence interval [CI] [5.6, 6.0]) US adults aged 51 and older are living with dementia, supported by 5.2 million (95% CI [4.9, 5.5]) care partners. Total costs are $818 billion (B, 95% CI [759, 866]), driven by quality-of-life losses for persons with dementia ($320B, 95% CI [269, 363]) and care partners ($15B 95% CI [6, 25]). Unpaid care ($237B, 95% CI [220, 253]), earnings losses ($23B), and out-of-pocket costs combined with quality-of-life losses account for 80% of costs and are borne by families Alzheimer's & Dementia 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42340126
Cost of dementia care Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

A descriptive spending analysis with no exposure compared, so there is no direction to record: Part D spending rose with dual-eligibility duration, Part B drug spending varied widely by state, and ACO enrollment made only a modest difference.

Medicare Part D and Part B drug spending and out-of-pocket costs among fee-for-service beneficiaries with dementia, by dual eligibility, state and ACO enrollment cross-sectional study 1,372,696 Medicare Part D drug spending was substantial, increasing with dual-eligibility duration: $8732-$9107 among beneficiaries with full-year dual eligibility and exceeding $11 500 among those with 5+ chronic conditions ... Medicare Part B drug spending was highest among Medicare-only beneficiaries and varied widely by state, ranging from $433 to $1827 among Medicare-only beneficiaries and from $179 to $1446 among dually eligible beneficiaries Innovation in Aging 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42787606
Cost of dementia care Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

A cost projection: total burden is estimated at $344 billion in 2020 rising to over $3 trillion in 2060, with African American and Latino families projected to bear a disproportionate share. It compares spending shares between groups but tests no exposure, so no direction is recorded.

Total US economic burden of dementia by race and ethnicity, 2020 to 2060 modelling study 31,028 The total estimated economic burden of ADRD was close to $344 billion in 2020 and was projected to increase to over $3 trillion in 2060. African American and Latino adults bore one-third ($113 billion) of it in 2020, with projections rising to $1.7 trillion by 2060, surpassing the economic burden for White adults, which was projected to grow from $231 billion to $1.4 trillion JAMA Network Open 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40471578
Cost of dementia care Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

A cost estimate with no exposure compared, so there is no direction to record. Higher unpaid-care costs went with lower medical spending on nursing facility care.

Annual cost of care attributable to dementia per case in 2019 and the unpaid-care share of total cost by US state modelling study not stated The annual cost of care attributable to dementia in 2019 was $53,502 (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 46,135-60,594) per case. The contribution of unpaid care to total costs varied by state, ranging from 70.2% (95% UI 64.3-75.4) in the District of Columbia to 89.9% (95% UI 87.8-91.5) in Arizona Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40111940
Cost of dementia care Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

A cost projection with no exposure compared, so there is no direction to record. Dementia's share of replacement cost is projected to rise from 44% to 53%.

Replacement cost of unpaid family care and opportunity cost of forgone earnings for older Americans with and without dementia, now and projected to 2060 modelling study not stated Current annual replacement cost of unpaid family care is between $96 and $182 billion, 44% of which is accounted for by dementia caregiving. By 2060, it will increase to $277-571 billion, and 53% will be for dementia caregiving. The opportunity costs of forgone earnings and productivity loss, however, will grow faster, increasing from current levels of $107 billion and $26 billion to $380 billion and $102 billion, respectively, in 2060 Innovation in Aging 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40662057
Cost of dementia care Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

A cost estimate with no exposure compared, so there is no direction to record.

Annual indirect cost of Alzheimer's disease per person by severity, and total US indirect cost modelling study not stated $36 934 for mild cognitive impairment owing to AD, $65 565 for mild AD, $103 717 for moderate AD, and $145 250 for severe AD (2024 United States Dollars [USD]). Considering the current distribution of prevalent patients across severity stages, the total annual indirect cost was estimated at $832 billion, which includes $599 billion in unpaid caregiving costs and $233 billion in productivity losses Value in Health 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39571734
Cost of dementia care Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

A cost estimate and projection with no exposure compared, so there is no direction to record.

Per-patient cost of care in 2016 and aggregate US cost projected 2020-2060 modelling study not stated In 2016, the estimated per patient cost of formal care was $28,078 (95% confidence interval [CI]: $25,893-$30,433), and informal care cost valued in terms of replacement cost and forgone wages was $36,667 ($34,025-$39,473) and $15,792 ($12,980-$18,713), respectively. Aggregate formal care cost and formal plus informal care cost using replacement cost and forgone wage methods were $196 billion (95% uncertainty range [UR]: $179-$213 billion), $450 billion ($424-$478 billion), and $305 billion ($278-$333 billion), respectively, in 2020. These were projected to increase to $1.4 trillion ($837 billion-$2.2 trillion), $3.3 trillion ($1.9-$5.1 trillion), and $2.2 trillion ($1.3-$3.5 trillion), respectively, in 2060 npj Aging 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38331952
Cost of dementia care Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

A cost estimation across 204 countries with no exposure compared, so there is no direction to record.

Global direct health care spending and informal care cost attributable to dementia, 2019, with projection to 2050 modelling study not stated in 2019, the direct health care spending attributable to ADRD across 204 countries reached $260.6 billion (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 131.6-420.4) and the cost of informal ADRD care was $354.1 billion (95% UI 190.0-544.1). On average, informal care represents 57% (95% UI 38-75%) of the total cost of care. We estimated that direct health care spending attributable to ADRD will reach $1.6 trillion (95% UI 0.6-3.3) in 2050, or 9.4% (95% UI 3.9-19.6%) of projected health spending worldwide Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39150827
Cost-effectiveness of anti-amyloid antibody Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

A threshold analysis estimating what each country should be willing to pay (from $4-$18 a year in low-income countries to $254-$9,434 for lecanemab and $387-$13,964 for donanemab in high-income countries). It sets no price against an actual list price, so there is no direction to record.

Incremental QALYs versus usual care and value-based annual prices for lecanemab and donanemab across 174 countries modelling study not stated Compared to usual care, lecanemab and donanemab respectively increased average QALYs by 0.38 and 0.51. By country income status, VBPs for lecanemab and donanemab respectively ranged between $254 to $9434 and $387 to $13,964 (high income), $90 to $1025 and $137 to $1507 (upper middle income), $11 to $623 and $21 to $956 (lower middle income) and $4 to $18 and $9 to $32 (low income) Alzheimer's & Dementia 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42125995
Cost-effectiveness of anti-amyloid antibody Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

A cost-effectiveness model reporting ICERs of JPY 8.5 million and 7.9 million per QALY without stating a threshold or a verdict; the authors argue that narrow value assessments understate social value. No direction is recorded.

Incremental QALYs (patient plus caregiver) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of lecanemab added to standard care in Japan modelling study not stated The incremental QALYs were 1.31 QALYs for MCI due to AD and 0.85 QALYs for mild AD-D, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were JPY 8.5 million /QALY and JPY 7.9 million /QALY ($1 = JPY 150), respectively Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42108615
Diagnostic criteria / biological definition of Alzheimer's Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

A criteria document. It defines Alzheimer's disease biologically and sets out staging, and reports no effect estimate.

None measured (diagnostic criteria document) None not stated not established — criteria document; it states definitions and reports no effect estimate. Alzheimer's & Dementia 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38934362
Diagnostic criteria / biological definition of Alzheimer's Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

An editorial. It argues that biomarker positivity alone should not define Alzheimer's disease in people without symptoms, and reports no data of its own.

None measured (editorial) None not stated not established — editorial read in full at jpreventionalzheimer.com; pubmed carries no abstract for it and it reports no effect estimate. The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease 2024
⚠ Editorial — not peer-reviewed research PMID 39044499
Diagnostic criteria / biological definition of Alzheimer's Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

A research framework defining Alzheimer's disease by biomarkers (the AT(N) system) for research use. It states its own intended limits and reports no effect estimate.

None measured (research framework) None not stated not established — framework document; the abstract reports no effect estimate. Alzheimer's & Dementia 2018
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 29653606
Diagnostic evaluation and disclosure guideline Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

Consensus guidance for primary care on disclosing and communicating a dementia diagnosis, developed with patients, care partners and clinicians. It reports no effect estimate.

None measured (consensus guidance on disclosing a dementia diagnosis) None not stated not established — guidance document; the abstract reports no effect estimate. Alzheimer's & Dementia 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41085169
Diagnostic evaluation and disclosure guideline Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

A clinical practice guideline. It sets out a structured, patient-centred process for evaluating, diagnosing and disclosing suspected Alzheimer's disease or related dementias in any practice setting, and reports no effect estimate.

None measured (clinical practice guideline for primary care) systematic review not stated not established — guideline; the abstract reports no effect estimate. Alzheimer's & Dementia 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39713942
Health-system and payment model Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

A single-programme implementation report with no comparison group. It counts enrolment and service use and estimates no effect.

Enrolment, respite use and disenrolment in the first year of one GUIDE programme cohort study 158 Over 35% of eligible beneficiaries have utilized respite services. Approximately 9% have disenrolled, the majority (64%) expired/hospice Innovation in Aging (GSA 2025 conference abstract) 2025
⚠ Conference abstract — not peer-reviewed DOI 10.1093/geroni/igaf122.3561
Health-system and payment model Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

Implementation guidance drawn from six earlier comprehensive dementia care programmes. It reports no effect estimate of its own.

None measured (implementation guidance) None not stated not established — guidance article; the abstract reports no data. the library's "up to 20% of emergency department visits ... avoidable" is a cited statistic not in… Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41170936
MRI amygdalar atrophy scale (marker of LATE) Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

A classification-validation study without a neuropathological reference standard, so accuracy cannot be judged. The groups behaved as expected: patients labelled LATE had mild amnestic impairment, limbic atrophy and stable MMSE over 30 months, while AD and AD/LATE groups declined.

Clinical, imaging and 30-month cognitive profiles of memory-clinic patients classified as LATE, AD, AD/LATE or neither by the amygdalar atrophy scale plus AD biomarkers cohort study 469 the LATE group maintained cognitive stability as the No-AD/No-LATE group (β = -0.010, 95% CI -0.096 to 0.075, p = 0.813), whereas both AD (β = -0.136, 95% CI -0.184 to -0.088, p < 0.001) and AD/LATE (β = -0.139, 95% CI -0.196 to -0.082, p < 0.001) groups showed faster decline over time Neurology 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41428981
Palliative / advance care planning Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

A Delphi consensus among 60 international expert panellists, reaching agreement on 15 major and 42 minor referral criteria. No patient outcome is measured and no effect is estimated.

Consensus referral criteria for specialist palliative care (no patient outcome) cross-sectional study 60 not established — delphi survey; the abstract reports consensus counts (15 major, 42 minor criteria), not an effect estimate. JAMA Network Open 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40366652
Prognosis after dementia diagnosis (survival, nursing home admission) Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

A prognosis meta-analysis: it pools time to death and to nursing home admission and compares no exposure. Women's shorter survival was attributable to later age at diagnosis.

Median survival and time to nursing home admission after diagnosis meta-analysis 5,553,960 Median survival from diagnosis appeared to be strongly dependent on age, ranging from 8.9 years at mean age 60 for women to 2.2 years at mean age 85 for men ... Median time to nursing home admission was 3.3 years (interquartile range 1.9 to 4.0). 13% of people were admitted in the first year after diagnosis, increasing to 57% at five years BMJ 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39778977
APOE genotype Genes (not modifiable) Prevention No direction reported
why

A descriptive proteomic mapping: APOE-linked protein changes were present before amyloid pathology and stable across age and disease stage, with ε2 tied to cellular-maintenance and anti-inflammatory pathways and ε4 to cell-cycle, oligodendrocyte-precursor and downstream vascular, immune and proteostatic proteins. It estimates no effect on a clinical outcome.

Plasma and CSF proteomic signatures of APOE ε4 and ε2 across five cohorts cross-sectional study not stated not established — pubmed abstract reports no numeric effect size. Nature Aging 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42141098
Polygenic risk / GWAS loci Genes (not modifiable) Prevention No direction reported
why

A transcriptome-wide association study prioritising nine genes (including BIN1, PTK2B and DMPK) with broadly consistent effects across populations; it reports no effect estimate for any exposure, so no direction is recorded.

Genes whose blood expression is genetically associated with Alzheimer's disease across three populations cross-sectional study 751 not established — pubmed abstract reports gene counts and a correlation (r2 ≈ 0.34 between two bin1 variants), no effect estimate. American Journal of Human Genetics 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42066773
Polygenic risk / GWAS loci Genes (not modifiable) Prevention No direction reported
why

Locus-discovery genome-wide association study: it reports which genetic regions reached significance and no effect estimate for any exposure, so no direction is recorded. Nine signals (HP1BP3, SLC50A1, PTPRC, NPAS3, DDHD1, CHST9, SMYD2, PRAMEF1, GFRA1) appeared only in APOE-stratified analyses; DDHD1 was protective in ε4 carriers.

New genome-wide risk loci for AD found when stratifying by APOE ε4 and ε2 carrier status case-control study not stated not established — the abstract names nine new loci and prints no effect estimate. Nature genetics 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42736378
Polygenic risk / GWAS loci Genes (not modifiable) Prevention No direction reported
why

Locus-discovery genome-wide association study: it reports which genetic regions reached significance and no effect estimate for any exposure, so no direction is recorded. The study reports 14 new loci for clinically diagnosed AD and two from AD-by-proxy.

Genome-wide significant loci for clinically diagnosed AD and AD-by-proxy meta-analysis 432,374 not established — pubmed abstract lists the loci by name and reports no effect estimate. Alzheimer's & Dementia 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39998322
Polygenic risk / GWAS loci Genes (not modifiable) Prevention No direction reported
why

Locus-discovery genome-wide association study: it reports which genetic regions reached significance and no effect estimate for any exposure, so no direction is recorded. The study reports eight new loci (six ancestry-specific, two trans-ancestry) and nominates eight genes in microglial activation, glutamate production and signalling.

Genome-wide significant loci for early-onset Alzheimer's disease (onset before 70) case-control study 25,236 not established — pubmed abstract reports locus counts and pathways, no effect estimate. Alzheimer's & Dementia 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40556318
Polygenic risk / GWAS loci Genes (not modifiable) Prevention No direction reported
why

Locus-discovery genome-wide association study: it reports which genetic regions reached significance and no effect estimate for any exposure, so no direction is recorded. Beyond APOE, the study reports TREM2 R47H and variants near RAB3B, SPOCK3/ANXA10 and SMAP2, and a gene-based association with GIPR.

Genome-wide and exome-wide loci for Alzheimer's disease in Ashkenazi Jews case-control study not stated not established — pubmed abstract reports p-values for the loci and no effect estimate. Alzheimer's & Dementia 2023
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 37260021
Polygenic risk / GWAS loci Genes (not modifiable) Prevention No direction reported
why

Locus-discovery genome-wide association study: it reports which genetic regions reached significance and no effect estimate for any exposure, so no direction is recorded. Two signals at 17p13.2 and 18q21.33 are reported; the authors state that African ancestry at 17p13.2 went with lower AD risk and that overall African ancestry did not differ between cases and controls, without an effect estimate.

Admixture-mapping loci for Alzheimer's disease in African Americans case-control study 10,271 not established — pubmed abstract reports p-values for the two loci and no effect estimate. Alzheimer's & Dementia 2023
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 36539198
Rare protective or risk variant (APOE3 Christchurch, APOE R145C, RELN, FN1) Genes (not modifiable) Prevention No direction reported
why

A single case report: one man with the PSEN1 E280A mutation stayed cognitively intact until 67 despite very heavy amyloid, and carried a gain-of-function RELN variant. With one case and no comparison group beyond the earlier Christchurch case, no direction can be recorded.

Cognitive status and amyloid/tau burden in one PSEN1 E280A carrier heterozygous for RELN-COLBOS None not stated not established — case report; the abstract reports no effect estimate. Nature Medicine 2023
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 37188781
Rare protective or risk variant (APOE3 Christchurch, APOE R145C, RELN, FN1) Genes (not modifiable) Prevention No direction reported
why

Among 37 heterozygous carriers (ages 56.6-82.1) none had developed AD or MCI by the March 2022 data freeze and apolipoprotein B was lower than in non-carriers, but the authors say continued follow-up is necessary and no homozygotes were found, so protection could not be tested. No incidence comparison is reported, so no direction is recorded.

Alzheimer's disease or MCI diagnoses and blood lipid biomarkers in heterozygous APOE Christchurch carriers cohort study 455,306 not established — research letter with no pubmed abstract; the full text at pmc10685495 reports carrier counts and p-values (apob p = 0.004; p = 0.036… Molecular Neurodegeneration 2023
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38017580
Brain insulin resistance ('type 3 diabetes') Heart and metabolic health Prevention No direction reported
why

A narrative review arguing that Alzheimer's disease is a brain-specific form of diabetes; it states that type 2 diabetes alone "fall[s] far short of mimicking AD" and reports no effect estimate.

Alzheimer-type neurodegeneration (mechanistic argument) None not stated not established — review; the abstract reports no effect estimate. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology 2008
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 19885299
Amyloid hypothesis (target rationale) Medicines Treatment No direction reported
why

A retraction notice. It withdraws the 2006 Nature paper on Aβ*56 over figures showing "signs of excessive manipulation, including splicing, duplication and the use of an eraser tool", and reports no effect estimate.

None measured (retraction notice) None not stated not established — retraction notice read at nature.com (doi 10.1038/s41586-024-07691-8) via a reader proxy; pubmed carries no abstract for it. it retracts nature doi… Nature 2024
⚠ Retraction notice — not a study PMID 38914864
Amyloid hypothesis (target rationale) Medicines Treatment No direction reported
why

An investigative news feature reporting signs of image fabrication in papers on the Aβ*56 amyloid oligomer. It is not a study of an outcome and reports no effect estimate.

None measured (investigative news feature) None not stated not established — news feature; no effect estimate exists. the pubmed record carries a one-sentence abstract. Science 2022
⚠ News feature — not a peer-reviewed study PMID 35862524
Amyloid hypothesis (target rationale) Medicines Treatment No direction reported
why

A perspective review of arguments for and against the amyloid hypothesis, concluding that amyloid-beta is likely necessary but not sufficient and acts early as a trigger of tau-mediated neurodegeneration. It reports no effect estimate.

None measured (perspective review) None not stated not established — review; the abstract reports no effect estimate. Nature Neuroscience 2015
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 26007213
Anti-amyloid antibody Medicines Treatment No direction reported
why

Mechanistic multi-omic profiling of blood from three ARIA-positive patients and three matched controls on lecanemab. It describes a clonally expanded cytotoxic CD8+ T-cell signature and estimates no clinical effect.

Peripheral CD8+ T-cell signature in lecanemab-associated ARIA case-control study 6 not established — pubmed abstract reports no numeric effect size. Nature Communications 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41617706
Anti-amyloid antibody Medicines Treatment No direction reported
why

A single-clinic safety series with no comparison group. It reports how often ARIA and infusion reactions happened in practice, which is useful, but it cannot estimate an effect of the drug in either direction.

ARIA and infusion reactions in routine care cohort study 234 ARIA 22%; symptomatic ARIA 5.7% overall, 27% in mild dementia vs 1.8% in MCI/very mild dementia JAMA Neurology 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40354064
Anti-amyloid antibody Medicines Treatment No direction reported
why

A mechanistic tissue study describing which microglial states accompany amyloid removal (TREM2 and APOE upregulation correlating with antibody response and clearance; complement signalling contributing). It estimates no effect of immunisation on a clinical outcome.

Microglial transcriptional states associated with amyloid clearance in post-mortem brain after active (AN1792) or passive (lecanemab) immunisation None not stated not established — pubmed abstract reports no numeric effect size. Nature Medicine 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40050704
Anti-amyloid antibody Medicines Treatment No direction reported
why

Corporate announcement discontinuing a product and terminating its confirmatory trial. It reports no clinical outcome, so no direction exists to record.

None reported company announcement not stated not established — the announcement reports a business decision and states the move was not related to safety or efficacy, so there is no effect estimate to quote. Biogen Inc. press release 2024
⚠ Press release — not a study no DOI or PMID exists
Anti-amyloid antibody Medicines Treatment No direction reported
why

A coverage determination. It sets the conditions under which Medicare pays and reports no effect estimate.

Coverage policy coverage determination not stated not established — checked the cms page directly: it states coverage conditions and registry requirements only, with no effect estimate or adverse-event rate. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 2022
⚠ Regulatory decision — not a study no DOI or PMID exists
Microglia / neuroinflammation target (preclinical) Medicines Treatment No direction reported
why

A descriptive transcriptional atlas: it maps expression changes, isoform usage, co-expression modules and disease subtypes in microglia from post-mortem brains and estimates no effect of an exposure.

Microglial gene-expression changes associated with dementia severity and neuropathological lesions (ex vivo human microglia) None 189 not established — pubmed abstract reports no numeric effect size. Nature Neuroscience 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40760184
Other investigational drug Medicines Treatment No direction reported
why

A regulatory enforcement action, not a study. The SEC's order finds the reported Phase 2 biomarker data were manipulated by an unblinded consultant and its complaint alleges the full patient data "showed no measurable cognitive improvement in the patients' episodic memory"; it estimates no effect.

Securities-fraud settlement over reported Phase 2 simufilam results regulatory decision not stated not established — sec press release 2024-151, fetched from sec.gov via a reader proxy. it states civil penalties of $40 million (cassava), $175,000 (barbier) and… SEC Press Release / Administrative Order (Securities Act of 1933 Release No. 11311) 2024
⚠ Regulatory decision — not a study no DOI or PMID exists
Other investigational drug Medicines Treatment No direction reported
why

Retraction notices for five PLOS ONE papers by Wang and colleagues, two co-authored with a Cassava Sciences employee. They withdraw the papers over blot-image integrity and estimate no effect.

None measured (retraction notices) None not stated not established — retraction watch news post fetched from retractionwatch.com, quoting the plos one notice: "the pixel patterns in background areas of blot images… PLOS ONE (retraction notices, reported by Retraction Watch) 2022
⚠ Retraction notice — not a study no DOI or PMID exists
Psychotropics for agitation / psychosis Medicines Treatment No direction reported
why

A feasibility trial in 29 residents: designed to test whether the trial can be run, not powered for efficacy, and it reports no efficacy estimate.

Feasibility, adherence and safety randomised trial 29 100% adherence; no withdrawals; 0 adverse reactions Age and Ageing 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40479610
Tau propagation mechanism (preclinical target rationale) Medicines Treatment No direction reported
why

A mechanism study: it shows Arc packages tau into extracellular vesicles and that cell-to-cell tau transmission is almost absent in Arc knockout mice, with Arc levels correlating with phosphorylated tau in human AD brain vesicles. It tests no intervention and estimates no effect on an outcome.

Tau content and seeding potential of brain extracellular vesicles, and intercellular tau transmission, in tau-transgenic mice lacking Arc None not stated not established — pubmed abstract reports no numeric effect size. Cell 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42372723
Tau propagation mechanism (preclinical target rationale) Medicines Treatment No direction reported
why

A model-building and screening study: it identifies over 500 genetic modifiers of tau propagation (including VPS29 and the UFMylation cascade) and shows UFMylation inhibition suppresses seeded propagation in vitro and in vivo. It estimates no effect on a clinical outcome.

Seeding-induced tau propagation in human iPSC-derived 4R-P301S neurons, and genetic modifiers found by CRISPRi screen None not stated not established — pubmed abstract reports no numeric effect size. Cell 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38582079
Sleep Sleep, mood and social life Prevention No direction reported
why

A narrative review proposing glymphatic failure as a final common pathway to dementia. It reports no effect estimate.

Dementia pathogenesis (glymphatic clearance of protein waste) None not stated not established — review; the abstract reports no effect estimate. Science 2020
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 33004510

How this table was built, and where it is weak →