Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Every row

Showing 7 of 382 rows. One row per study per exposure: a study that tested two different things appears twice, once for each.

Scroll the table sideways to see every column.

Research and outcomes, 7 rows. Every row links to its source.
Exposure Question Direction Outcome measured Design People Effect size, as the source reported it Source
Anti-amyloid antibody Medicines Treatment Harm
why

The review's subject is the harm itself: brain swelling and microbleeds caused by the drugs.

ARIA incidence and severity systematic review not stated "ARIA-E and ARIA-H occurred in 12.6% and 17.3% of participants on lecanemab, respectively" (CLARITY-AD); "ARIA-E and ARIA-H occurred in 24% and 31% of participants on donanemab, respectively" (TRAILBLAZER-ALZ-2); APOE e4 homozygotes "may have ~2.5 to 5 times greater risk for incident ARIA-E and for ARIA-H" Alzheimer's & Dementia 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42015334
Anti-amyloid antibody Medicines Treatment Harm
why

Against placebo: ARIA-E 24.4% vs 1.9%. Risk tracks APOE4 status and baseline imaging.

ARIA-E and ARIA-H incidence phase 3 trial 3,030 ARIA-E 24.4% vs 1.9% placebo; symptomatic ARIA-E 5.8%; serious ARIA-E 1.5% JAMA Neurology 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40063015
Anticholinergic / benzodiazepine burden Medicines Treatment Harm 180-day mortality case-control study 139,103 180-day mortality HR 1.41 (95% CI 1.38-1.44) for benzodiazepines; HR 1.16 (95% CI 1.12-1.20) for antipsychotics JAMA Network Open 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41085983
Antipsychotics (harms / discontinuation) Medicines Treatment Harm 180-day mortality case-control study 139,103 180-day mortality HR 1.41 (95% CI 1.38-1.44) for benzodiazepines; HR 1.16 (95% CI 1.12-1.20) for antipsychotics JAMA Network Open 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41085983
Antipsychotics (harms / discontinuation) Medicines Treatment Harm
why

Wider range of harms than regulatory alerts had flagged, with the highest risks soon after starting. No increase in ventricular arrhythmia.

Stroke, pneumonia, venous thromboembolism, MI, heart failure, fracture, acute kidney injury cohort study 173,910 Pneumonia HR 2.19 (95% CI 2.10-2.28); stroke HR 1.61 (1.52-1.71); absolute 90-day pneumonia risk difference 2.99% BMJ 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38631737
Antiviral (valacyclovir) for HSV-seropositive Alzheimer's Medicines Treatment Harm
why

Direction is for valacyclovir: cognition worsened more on the drug than on placebo on the primary outcome (between-group difference 3.93 ADAS-Cog points, P = .01); function, amyloid PET and tau PET did not differ. The authors conclude it is not recommended.

ADAS-Cog change at 78 weeks (primary); ADCS-ADL, amyloid PET and tau PET phase 2 trial 120 At 78 weeks, the LSM change in the 11-item ADAS-Cognitive Subscale score was 10.86 (95% CI, 8.80 to 12.91) in the valacyclovir group vs 6.92 (95% CI, 4.88 to 8.97) in the placebo group, indicating greater cognitive worsening with valacyclovir than placebo (between-group difference, 3.93 [95% CI, 1.03 to 6.83]; P = .01). The LSM change in the ADCS-ADL Scale score at 78 weeks was -13.78 (95% CI, -17.00 to -10.56) in the valacyclovir group vs -10.16 (95% CI, -13.37 to -6.96) in the placebo group (between-group difference, -3.62 [95% CI, -8.16 to 0.93]) JAMA 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41405855
Tau propagation mechanism (preclinical target rationale) Medicines Treatment Harm
why

Direction is for tau seeding activity: substantial hippocampal and neocortical seeding was present even without overt neocortical tangles and predicted region-specific cognitive performance and longitudinal decline; seeding and modification profiles tracked neuritic plaque density and separated AD from PART.

Tau seeding activity and post-translational modifications in hippocampus and neocortex of Braak-matched AD neuropathologic change versus primary age-related tauopathy, and relation to cognition None 38 not established — pubmed abstract reports no numeric effect size. Nature Communications 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39984462

How this table was built, and where it is weak →