Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Every row

Showing 144 of 382 rows. One row per study per exposure: a study that tested two different things appears twice, once for each.

Scroll the table sideways to see every column.

Research and outcomes, 144 rows. Every row links to its source.
Exposure Question Direction Outcome measured Design People Effect size, as the source reported it Source
Alcohol Alcohol, tobacco and cannabis Prevention Benefit
why

This one reports light-to-moderate drinking as protective (HR 0.65) against non-drinking, and it flatly contradicts the Mendelian randomisation evidence. Infrequent drinkers were excluded, and non-drinkers include people who stopped for health reasons.

Incident dementia over a median 13.7 years cohort study 296,715 Low-moderate drinking HR 0.65 (95% CI 0.59-0.73) vs non-drinking European Journal of Epidemiology 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41014391
Smoking Alcohol, tobacco and cannabis Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for QUITTING. Risk approached that of never-smokers and levelled off about seven years after quitting; weight gain after quitting narrowed the advantage. The authors flag residual confounding.

Incident dementia over a median 9.9 years cohort study 32,802 HR 0.84 (95% CI 0.73-0.95) for quitting during follow-up vs continuing to smoke Neurology 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42160746
Birth cohort and calendar period (secular trend in dementia) All modifiable factors together Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for more recent birth cohort: after controlling for age and period, later-born cohorts were less likely to have dementia in all three regions, more so among women; the point estimates for men in England were not significant.

Age-specific dementia prevalence by birth cohort in the US, Europe and England cross-sectional study 62,437 point estimate for 1944-1948 vs 1919-1923 cohorts: US, -0.55 [95% CI, -0.77 to -0.34] vs -0.18 [95% CI, -0.25 to -0.10]; Europe, -1.49 [95% CI, -1.72 to -1.27] vs -0.24 [95% CI, -0.35 to -0.13]; and England, -0.48 [95% CI, -0.89 to -0.08] vs -0.23 [95% CI, -0.38 to -0.07] JAMA Network Open 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40455442
Birth cohort and calendar period (secular trend in dementia) All modifiable factors together Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for later birth cohort: each successive cohort had a significantly lower incident dementia rate, independent of sex, education and age.

Incident dementia rate by decade of birth (1902-1941) cohort study 3,010 Compared to the earliest birth cohort (1902-1911), each subsequent cohort had a significantly lower incident dementia rate (1912-1921: incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.655, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.477-0.899; 1922-1931: IRR = 0.387, 95% CI = 0.265-0.564; 1932-1941: IRR = 0.233, 95% CI = 0.121-0.449) The Journals of Gerontology: Series A (Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences) 2019
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 30312371
Birth cohort and calendar period (secular trend in dementia) All modifiable factors together Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for the later survey year: prevalence fell from 11.6% to 8.8%, with rising education associated with some of the decline despite a worse cardiovascular risk profile.

Dementia prevalence among US adults 65+, 2000 versus 2012 cross-sectional study 21,057 Dementia prevalence among those 65 years or older decreased from 11.6% (95% CI, 10.7%-12.7%) in 2000 to 8.8% (95% CI, 8.2%-9.4%) (8.6% with age- and sex-standardization) in 2012 (P < .001) JAMA Internal Medicine 2017
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 27893041
Birth cohort and calendar period (secular trend in dementia) All modifiable factors together Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for later calendar epoch: incidence fell 44% from the first to the fourth epoch, but only among people with at least a high school diploma. The authors could not fully explain the decline.

5-year incidence of dementia across four epochs (late 1970s to early 2010s) cohort study 5,205 The 5-year age- and sex-adjusted cumulative hazard rates for dementia were 3.6 per 100 persons during the first epoch (late 1970s and early 1980s), 2.8 per 100 persons during the second epoch (late 1980s and early 1990s), 2.2 per 100 persons during the third epoch (late 1990s and early 2000s), and 2.0 per 100 persons during the fourth epoch (late 2000s and early 2010s). Relative to the incidence during the first epoch, the incidence declined by 22%, 38%, and 44% during the second, third, and fourth epochs, respectively. This risk reduction was observed only among persons who had at least a high school diploma (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.67 to 0.88) New England Journal of Medicine 2016
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 26863354
Birth cohort and calendar period (secular trend in dementia) All modifiable factors together Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for the later-born population: prevalence was 6.5% against the 8.3% expected from the earlier study (odds ratio 0.7), which the authors read as a cohort effect.

Dementia prevalence at age 65+ in three English areas, CFAS II (2008-11) versus CFAS I (1989-94) cross-sectional study 15,431 Using CFAS I age and sex specific estimates of prevalence in individuals aged 65 years or older, standardised to the 2011 population, 8·3% (884,000) of this population would be expected to have dementia in 2011. However, CFAS II shows that the prevalence is lower (6·5%; 670,000), a decrease of 1·8% (odds ratio for CFAS II vs CFAS I 0·7, 95% CI 0·6-0·9, p=0·003) The Lancet 2013
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 23871492
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. The estimated age at plasma %p-tau217 positivity predicted age at symptom onset (adjusted R2 0.337-0.612) with a median absolute error of 3.0-3.7 years, which the authors call acceptable for trials but not yet for individual clinical use.

Predicted age at onset of Alzheimer's symptoms from plasma %p-tau217 clock models cohort study 603 The estimated age at plasma %p-tau217 positivity was associated with the age at onset of AD symptoms (adjusted R2 of 0.337-0.612) with a median absolute error of 3.0-3.7 years Nature medicine 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41714746
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Stand-alone plasma p-tau217 gave 81% accuracy and 79% PPV; confirming positives with PET or CSF raised both to 91% while cutting PET scans needed to find 100 amyloid-positive people from 536 to 124. Immunoassays matched mass spectrometry on PPV but had lower accuracy.

Accuracy and positive predictive value for amyloid positivity (CSF or PET) in cognitively unimpaired people, stand-alone and in a two-step workflow cross-sectional study 2,916 As a stand-alone test, plasma p-tau217 achieved a positive predictive value (PPV) of 79% (95% CI, 74-84) and an overall accuracy of 81% (95% CI, 80-82). In a 2-step workflow, the PPV and accuracy significantly increased to 91% (95% CI, 86-95). While this approach required screening of 677 individuals with plasma p-tau217 to identify 100 Aβ-positive individuals, compared to 536 participants when using PET alone, it reduced the need for PET testing to 124 JAMA Neurology 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40952756
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Combined plasma %p-tau217 and Aβ42/40 detected abnormal CSF amyloid status (AUC 0.949) and each predicted rising amyloid PET over time in people who started below the positivity threshold, replicated in two further cohorts; p-tau231 and GFAP added no clear independent value.

Prediction of subsequent brain amyloid accumulation (PET/CSF) in cognitively unimpaired people with subthreshold amyloid cohort study 983 a combination of plasma %p-tau217 and Aβ42/40 showed better performance (area under the curve = 0.949; 95% CI, 0.929-0.970; P <.02) than individual biomarkers ... longitudinal Aβ-PET (%p-tau217: β = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48-0.87; Aβ42/40: β = -0.33; 95% CI, -0.51 to -0.15; %p-tau217 × Aβ42/40: β = -0.31; 95% CI, -0.44 to -0.18; P < .001) JAMA Neurology 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39068669
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. All four assays (Lumipulse, Johnson & Johnson, ALZpath, NULISA) gave statistically equivalent AUCs of 0.84-0.90 for amyloid positivity, with cross-platform correlations of 0.40-0.86.

Cross-assay agreement and AUC for amyloid PET positivity across four p-tau217 immunoassays cross-sectional study 344 All four p-tau217 assays exhibited moderate to strong cross-platform correlations (Spearman correlations of 0.40–0.86), and statistically equivalent AUCs (of 0.84–0.90) for determining Aβ positivity Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41652516
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Among p-tau217-positive patients, a positive eMTBR-tau243 identified clinically established Alzheimer's disease with 81% accuracy and predicted faster cognitive decline and tau accumulation.

Classification of established Alzheimer's disease by plasma eMTBR-tau243 among %p-tau217-positive patients cohort study 572 194 (55%) of 350 %p-tau217-positive patients were also positive for eMTBR-tau243, with an accuracy of 81% (95% CI 76-84), PPV 84% (95% CI 78-88), negative predictive value (NPV) 77% (95% CI 68-82), and sensitivity 82% (95% CI 76-87) for established Alzheimer's disease, in cross-sectional analyses The Lancet. Neurology 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41864233
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Subgroup-specific optimal cutoffs and a double-cutoff strategy both improved accuracy over the standard single cutoff, most markedly in chronic kidney disease (0.65 to 0.83) and anaemia.

Accuracy of plasma p-tau217 for amyloid PET positivity under standard, subgroup-optimal and double cutoffs in people with kidney disease, abnormal BMI or anaemia cross-sectional study 2,571 In the UGOT cohort, the optimal cutoff improved diagnostic accuracy compared with the standard single cutoff, particularly in CKD and anemia (CKD: from 0.65; 95% CI, 0.57-0.72; to 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.89; anemia: from 0.80; 95% CI, 0.76-0.84; to 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82-0.90), with consistent findings in the Roche cohort JAMA neurology 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41627837
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. The prespecified APS2 cut point gave 91% accuracy, 90% sensitivity and 92% specificity against amyloid PET.

Agreement with amyloid PET in an independent cohort (ADNI) cross-sectional study 191 Concordance with amyloid PET was high (AUC-ROC 0.95 (95% CI): 0.93-0.98); 54% of participants had a positive APS2. The previously validated APS2 cut point yielded an overall accuracy of 91% (95% CI: 86-94%), sensitivity 90% (95% CI: 83-94%) and specificity 92% (95% CI: 84-96%) npj Dementia 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40917102
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Plasma p-tau217 detected amyloid PET positivity with 82% sensitivity and 86% specificity, comparable to CSF p-tau217; less sensitive for tau PET.

Sensitivity and specificity for amyloid and tau PET positivity (pooled) meta-analysis not stated Plasma p-tau217 showed 82% sensitivity for detecting amyloid and 83% for tau, with 86% and 83% specificity, respectively. CSF p-tau217 had 79% sensitivity for amyloid and 91% for tau, with 91% and 84% specificity Alzheimer's & Dementia 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39711334
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. AUC 0.93-0.96; accuracy 89-91% in secondary care and 85% in primary care, lower (83%) at age 80 or older; a two-cutoff approach raised accuracy to 92-94% at the cost of 12-17% intermediate results.

Diagnostic accuracy for Alzheimer pathology (CSF-defined) in secondary and primary care cross-sectional study 1,767 Plasma p-tau217 detected AD pathology with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.93-0.96. In secondary care, the accuracies were 89-91%, the positive predictive values 89-95% and the negative predictive values 77-90%. In primary care, the accuracy was 85%, the positive predictive values 82% and the negative predictive values 88%. Accuracy was lower in participants aged ≥80 years (83%) Nature Medicine 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40205199
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Plasma p-tau217 was the best-performing marker (88.1% sensitivity, 88.7% specificity, AUROC 91.1%, moderate certainty), ahead of p-tau181 and p-tau231; about 90% of studies were at high risk of bias.

Pooled sensitivity, specificity and AUROC for biologically defined Alzheimer's disease meta-analysis 29,625 Plasma p-tau217 was the highest-performing biomarker for identifying biologically defined Alzheimer's disease, with pooled sensitivity of 88·1% (95% CI 86·7-89·5, moderate certainty of evidence), specificity of 88·7% (87·4-89·9, moderate certainty of evidence), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 91·1% (88·9-92·4, moderate certainty of evidence), and diagnostic odds ratio of 50·7 (40·6-63·4). p-tau181 pooled sensitivity was 80·5% (78·4-82·4, low certainty of evidence), specificity was 76·4% (74·1-78·6, low certainty of evidence), AUROC was 81·5% (80·2-82·9, low certainty of evidence) The Lancet Neurology 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40818474
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. The Pitt-p-tau217 assay separated PSEN1 carriers from controls (AUC 0.94) and amyloid PET-positive from -negative cognitively normal adults (AUC up to 0.84), equivalent to the ALZpath assay.

Classification accuracy of a new p-tau217 assay against PSEN1 carrier status and amyloid PET cross-sectional study 363 Pitt-p-tau217 differentiated neuropathologically confirmed PSEN1 mutation carriers from controls with area under the curve (AUC) = 0.94, and amyloid beta (Aβ) positron emission tomography (PET)-positive from Aβ PET-negative cognitively normal older adults with AUC up to 0.84, equivalent to ALZpath-p-tau217 results. Both Pitt-p-tau217 and ALZpath-p-tau217 were slightly elevated in tau PET-positive versus tau PET-negative participants. Between-assay correlations were up to 0.93 Alzheimer's & Dementia 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40665482
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. All p-tau217 tests detected abnormal amyloid PET (AUC 0.91-0.96) and tau PET (0.94-0.97); the mass-spectrometry %p-tau217 ratio was best (accuracy 0.93 versus 0.83-0.88 for immunoassays) and is proposed as a stand-alone confirmatory test, with immunoassays better suited to triage.

Accuracy of five plasma p-tau217 tests for amyloid PET and tau PET status, benchmarked against CSF tests cohort study 998 All plasma p-tau217 tests exhibited a high ability to detect abnormal Aβ-PET [area under the curve (AUC) range: 0.91-0.96] and tau-PET (AUC range: 0.94-0.97) ... For detecting Aβ-PET status, %p-tau217WashU had an accuracy of 0.93 (immunoassays: 0.83-0.88), sensitivity of 0.91 (immunoassays: 0.84-0.87) and a specificity of 0.94 (immunoassays: 0.85-0.89) Brain 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39468767
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. The Lumipulse plasma p-tau217/Aβ42 ratio reached AUC 0.963-0.966 for amyloid PET and 0.947-0.974 for tau PET, equivalent to CSF tests and better than plasma p-tau217 alone, with fewer intermediate results.

Diagnostic accuracy for abnormal amyloid PET and tau PET in a clinic and a community cohort cross-sectional study 512 Plasma p-tau217/Aβ42 exhibited high performance for abnormal statuses of Aβ PET (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.963 to 0.966) and tau PET (AUC: 0.947 to 0.974) ... The p-tau217/Aβ42 ratio had a lower intermediate percentage than p-tau217 alone in both clinic (10.6% vs 13.0%) and community (16.5% vs 31.4%) cohorts Alzheimer's & Dementia 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40156286
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Plasma p-tau217/Aβ42 had the highest accuracy (0.88 in Black and 0.91 in White participants) and fewest intermediate results, with no difference in classification by race.

Accuracy for amyloid PET positivity in people who self-identify as Black or White cross-sectional study 1,135 In the test set, plasma p-tau217/Aβ42 had the highest accuracy (pBlack: 0.88, pWhite: 0.91) and lowest proportion of intermediate classifications (≤0.16), with no classification difference by race (odds ratio [OR] = 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.66-2.95, p = 0.33) Alzheimer's & Dementia 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40801297
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Plasma p-tau217 identified symptomatic AD with 95% sensitivity and 82% specificity (86% with the Aβ42 ratio) and tracked CSF biomarkers closely (AUC 0.94-0.96); reduced kidney function raised levels in patients without AD.

Sensitivity and specificity for symptomatic AD, and agreement with CSF biomarkers, in a tertiary outpatient memory clinic cross-sectional study 509 Plasma p-tau217 distinguished patients with diagnoses of symptomatic AD with 95% sensitivity and 82% specificity. Integration of Aβ42 measurements (p-tau217/Aβ42) incrementally improved specificity (86%). Plasma p-tau217 and p-tau217/Aβ42 concentrations closely associated with established CSF biomarkers of AD (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.94 and 0.96, respectively) Alzheimer's & Dementia 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40476540
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. The APS2 blood test reached AUC 0.96-0.97 and 88-92% accuracy, and its 91% accuracy for clinical AD beat primary care physicians (61%) and dementia specialists (73%).

Diagnostic accuracy for Alzheimer pathology (CSF-defined), and for clinical AD versus physicians' assessment cross-sectional study 1,213 the AUC was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.99) when the APS2 was used, the PPV was 91% (95% CI, 87%-96%), and the NPV was 92% (95% CI, 87%-96%) [primary care, single batch]; Primary care physicians had a diagnostic accuracy of 61% (95% CI, 53%-69%) for identifying clinical AD after clinical examination, cognitive testing, and a computed tomographic scan vs 91% (95% CI, 86%-96%) using the APS2. Dementia specialists had a diagnostic accuracy of 73% (95% CI, 68%-79%) vs 91% (95% CI, 88%-95%) using the APS2 JAMA 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39068545
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. APS2 gave AUC 0.94 and 88% agreement with amyloid PET, with similar performance by ethnicity, sex, age and APOE4 status.

Agreement with amyloid PET (brain amyloidosis) cross-sectional study 583 The AUC-ROC for the PrecivityAD2 test output, the Amyloid Probability Score 2, was 0.94, yielding 88% agreement with amyloid PET Alzheimer's & Dementia 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38491912
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. The ALZpath plasma p-tau217 immunoassay reached AUC 0.92-0.96 for amyloid and 0.93-0.97 for tau across three cohorts, comparable with CSF, and a three-range cut-off cut confirmatory testing by about 80%.

Accuracy for abnormal amyloid and tau pathology (PET or CSF) and longitudinal change cohort study 786 High accuracy was observed in identifying elevated Aβ (area under the curve [AUC], 0.92-0.96; 95% CI, 0.89-0.99) and tau pathology (AUC, 0.93-0.97; 95% CI, 0.84-0.99) across all cohorts. These accuracies were comparable with CSF biomarkers in determining abnormal PET signal. The detection of abnormal Aβ pathology using a 3-range reference yielded reproducible results and reduced confirmatory testing by approximately 80% JAMA Neurology 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38252443
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Plasma p-tau217 identified amyloid positivity with AUC 0.94; a two-cut-point rule sent only 17% for CSF or PET (sensitivity 0.94, specificity 0.86), and among amyloid-positive people it identified high tau load (AUC 0.92), potentially avoiding 56.9% of tau-PET scans.

Identification of amyloid positivity and of high tau-PET load (to select candidates for anti-amyloid antibodies) cohort study 912 plasma p-tau217 was most strongly associated with Aβ positivity (test-set area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90-0.97) ... This procedure had an overall sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.98) and a specificity of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77-0.95) ... At a false-negative rate less than 10%, the use of plasma p-tau217 could avoid 56.9% of tau-PET scans needed to identify high tau PET among Aβ-positive participants JAMA Neurology 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38048096
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. A blood model of p-tau217, age and APOE ε4 (AUC 89.3% development, 94.3% validation) used to triage patients gave 88-92% overall accuracy while cutting confirmatory CSF tests by 61-86%.

Accuracy for amyloid PET status and reduction in confirmatory CSF tests with a two-step plasma p-tau217 workflow cohort study 348 Depending on whether lenient, moderate or stringent thresholds were used in step 1, the two-step workflow overall accuracy for detecting Aβ-PET status was 88.2%, 90.5% and 92.0%, respectively, while reducing the number of necessary CSF tests by 85.9%, 72.7% and 61.2%, respectively Nature Aging 2023
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 37653254
Blood biomarkers (GFAP, NfL, p-tau181) for staging and prognosis Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for disclosing the blood panel during multidisciplinary meetings: median diagnostic confidence rose from 80% to 90%, though the suspected etiology changed in only 5% of patients and the syndrome diagnosis in 1%. Against CSF/PET, high- and low-probability results identified 76% of amyloid positives and 85% of negatives.

Change in clinician diagnostic confidence and in syndrome or etiological diagnosis after disclosure of a plasma biomarker panel (p-tau181, GFAP, NfL) cohort study 450 Median (IQR) diagnostic confidence in the total cohort increased from 80% (70%-90%) to 90% (70%-90%) after BBM disclosure (P < .001), increasing in 207 patients (46%), unchanged in 175 patients (39%), and decreasing in 68 patients (15%). Following BBM disclosure, syndrome diagnoses were revised in 6 patients (1%) and primary etiology was revealed in 23 patients (5%) JAMA Network Open 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42593792
Blood biomarkers (GFAP, NfL, p-tau217) for staging and prognosis Care, carers and services Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for the blood test's prognostic performance: plasma p-tau217 predicted cognitive decline and progression to MCI as well as tau PET (R2 0.33 vs 0.34; HR 1.57 vs 1.61), and using the blood test first cut the number needed to screen for a trial by 94%. A prognostic-performance result, not a health outcome.

Prediction of future cognitive decline and progression to MCI: plasma p-tau217 head-to-head with tau PET cohort study 1,474 plasma p-tau217 and medial temporal lobe tau-PET signal display similar associations with cognitive decline on a global cognitive composite test (R2PET = 0.34 versus R2plasma = 0.33, Pdifference = 0.653) and with progression to mild cognitive impairment (hazard ratio (HR)PET = 1.61 (1.48-1.76) versus HRplasma = 1.57 (1.43-1.72), Pdifference = 0.322) ... Sequential selection using plasma phosphorylated tau at threonine 217 (p-tau217) and then tau-PET reduced the number of participants required for a clinical trial by 94%, compared to a 76% reduction when using plasma p-tau217 alone Nature Aging 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40155777
Blood biomarkers (GFAP, NfL, p-tau217) for staging and prognosis Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. The two-marker plasma model matched PET-based stages with a C index of 0.91 in both the derivation and validation cohorts, tracked clinical stage (C index 0.84-0.86) and aligned with autopsy ADNC (AUC 0.96), improving on %p-tau217 alone at the intermediate stage.

Concordance of a plasma %p-tau217 plus eMTBR-tau243 staging model with amyloid/tau PET-based biological stages, clinical stage and autopsy-confirmed AD pathology cohort study 1,028 A plasma-based model with %p-tau217 and eMTBR-tau243 was derived, which demonstrated high concordance with established PET-based stages (C index, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.92) and was associated with clinical stage within the AD continuum (C index, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.82-0.86). In the validation cohort, concordance with PET-based stages was high (C index, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.87-0.94), as was concordance with clinical stage (C index, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82-0.89) ... In the neuropathology subsample, plasma staging was strongly aligned with autopsy-confirmed AD pathology using the Alzheimer Disease Neuropathologic Change scale (area under the curve, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.91-1.00) JAMA Neurology 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42189519
Blood biomarkers (GFAP, NfL, p-tau217) for staging and prognosis Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Plasma Aβ42/40, p-tau217, p-tau181 and NfL classified AD with AUC 83% and FTLD with 88%, consistent across countries, rising to 89% and 95% when combined with neuroimaging patterns and cognitive measures.

Discrimination of AD and frontotemporal lobar degeneration from controls by plasma AT(N) biomarkers in a multinational Latin American cohort cross-sectional study 605 Classification models achieved receiver operating characteristic areas under the curve (ROC AUCs) of 83% for AD and 88% for FTLD ... Biomarker alterations combined with disease-specific neuroimaging patterns and cognitive measures further improved accuracy (ROC AUCs of 89% for AD and 95% for FTLD) Nature Aging 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41688826
Blood biomarkers (GFAP, NfL, p-tau217) for staging and prognosis Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Serum GFAP tracked post-mortem tau pathology independently of amyloid, correlated negatively with brain weight and cognition, correlated with astrocyte reactivity in tissue, and separated neuropathologically confirmed AD from non-AD dementias with AUC 0.91.

Correlation of serum GFAP with post-mortem tau pathology, brain weight and astrocyte reactivity, and discrimination of autopsy-confirmed AD from non-AD dementia cohort study 139 an association between serum GFAP level and post-mortem tau pathology (β = 12.85; P < 0.001) that was independent of amyloid deposits (β = 13.23; P = 0.02) ... a negative correlation was observed between pre-mortem serum GFAP and brain weight at post-mortem (r = -0.35; P < 0.001) ... its discriminative power (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve at baseline = 0.91) in differentiating neuropathologically-confirmed Alzheimer's disease dementias from non-Alzheimer's disease dementias Brain 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38634687
CSF alpha-synuclein seed amplification assay Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Smell testing followed by CSF seed amplification only in those with reduced smell predicted brain Lewy body pathology with 94% accuracy and cut CSF testing by 43%; in a living cohort it predicted CSF assay status with 79% accuracy.

Accuracy for autopsy-confirmed Lewy body pathology and reduction in confirmatory CSF testing cohort study 1,567 Among 358 autopsied participants, the two-step workflow predicted brain LBP with high accuracy overall (94%), and within clinical subgroups (clinical parkinsonism=95%; clinical Alzheimer's disease [AD]=94%; clinically unimpaired [CU]=93%). It reduced the need for confirmatory CSF testing by 43% overall (23% clinical parkinsonism; 35% clinical AD; 80% CU). In an independent in vivo cohort (N=1209), the workflow predicted CSF α-syn SAA status with 79% accuracy and reduced CSF testing by 26% Nature Communications 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40764485
Carer psychosocial / skills intervention Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Benefit was larger for younger, male and non-spousal carers. The largest single effect (training the person with dementia) rests on 10 observations and the authors call it promising rather than definitive.

Carer anxiety and depression meta-analysis not stated "Interventions generally showed a significant reduction in anxiety and depression with varied effects on SWB [subjective well-being]" across 175 studies and 342 intervention treatments Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40550226
Carer psychosocial / skills intervention Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

A pilot designed to test feasibility; 68 carers and a 2-week outcome.

Pre-death grief at 2 weeks randomised trial 68 Pre-death grief Cohen d = -0.38 (mean change -3.29, SD 8.64, p=0.03) at 2 weeks JAMA Network Open 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42018322
Carer psychosocial / skills intervention Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Digital psychological interventions reduced caregiver burden and improved self-efficacy and quality of life; the effect on depressive symptoms was not statistically significant (P = .06).

Caregiver burden (primary); depression, self-efficacy and quality of life meta-analysis 750 digital psychological interventions significantly reduced caregiver burden [Standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.21, 95% CI: -0.35 to -0.07; P = .003] and improved self-efficacy (SMD = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.61, P = .001) and quality of life (SMD = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.91, P < .001). But digital psychological interventions have no statistically significant in alleviating depressive symptoms (P = .06) Age and ageing 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41505195
Carer psychosocial / skills intervention Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

At the 1-month comparison the automated self-guided programme reduced depression and burden and increased positive gains versus waitlist; anxiety did not differ. Group differences mostly disappeared once controls received the programme.

Caregiver depression (PHQ-9) at 1 month versus waitlist (primary); anxiety, burden and positive gains randomised trial 274 At 1-month follow-up, coinciding with exclusive access to PDC30, intervention caregivers showed significant improvements in depression (d = -0.37), burden (d = -0.34), and positive gains (d = 0.42) The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41644333
Carer psychosocial / skills intervention Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

A factorial trial of components: the mindfulness component carried the benefit and amplified the others.

Carer depressive symptoms (PHQ-9) at 12 months randomised trial 250 Mindfulness component: PHQ-9 depressive symptoms β = -2.13 (95% CI -2.85 to -1.38) at 12 months JAMA Network Open 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40094667
Carer psychosocial / skills intervention Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for NIDUS-Family: an 89% probability of cost-effectiveness from a health and social care perspective (87% societal) and £8,934 (37%) lower average costs, though the cost difference's confidence interval includes zero.

Probability of cost-effectiveness at £20,000-30,000 per QALY and 12-month costs versus goal setting and routine care randomised trial 302 At both a £20 000 and £30 000 decision threshold, there was an 89% probability that NIDUS-Family was cost-effective compared with usual care from a health and social care perspective, and an 87% probability from a societal perspective. Intervention participants accrued on average £8934 (37%) less in costs than control participants (95% CI -£59 460 to £41 592) The Lancet Healthy Longevity 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39978389
Carer psychosocial / skills intervention Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

The outcome is how prepared carers felt to decide about firearm access, not whether any injury was avoided.

Preparation for Decision Making score randomised trial 500 Preparation for Decision Making score +4.80 points (95% CI 0.53 to 9.07) vs control Annals of Internal Medicine 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39531391
Carer psychosocial / skills intervention Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for psychosocial and pharmacological interventions, which the review reports as showing mild to modest efficacy in high-quality meta-analyses. A narrative clinical review summarising other meta-analyses, not a new pooled estimate.

Caregiver burden None not stated Psychosocial interventions include support groups or psychoeducational interventions for caregivers of dementia patients (effect size, 0.09-0.23). Pharmacologic interventions include use of anticholinergics or antipsychotic medications for dementia or dementia-related behaviors in the care recipient (effect size, 0.18-0.27) JAMA 2014
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 24618967
Carer psychosocial / skills intervention Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Benefit in Hispanic and White caregivers and in Black spousal caregivers; not in Black non-spousal caregivers.

Caregiver quality of life and depression at 6 months randomised trial 642 Depression: 12.6% (intervention) vs. 22.7% (control) at 6 months Annals of Internal Medicine 2006
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 17116917
Carer psychosocial / skills intervention Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit Time to nursing home placement randomised trial 406 HR 0.717 for nursing home placement; median time to placement 557 days longer (model-predicted) in the intervention group Neurology 2006
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 17101889
Cognitive screening instrument accuracy Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Tablet tests correlated strongly with MMSE, MoCA and Trails A (r > 0.7) and the Match test separated amyloid-positive from -negative patients (AUC 0.82) better than MMSE or MoCA (0.75).

Correlation with pen-and-paper tests and discrimination of amyloid-positive from amyloid-negative early-onset AD patients cross-sectional study 475 Match and Flanker were associated with all pen‐and‐paper tests, with strongest correlations observed with the MMSE, MoCA, and Trails A (r's >0.7) ... Of TabCAT tests, Match best discriminated Aβ+ from Aβ‐ patients (Area Under the Curve (AUC)=0.82), outperforming the MMSE (AUC=0.75) and MoCA (AUC=0.75), and comparable to the overall best performing test Benson Figure Recall (AUC=0.85 Alzheimer's & Dementia (AAIC 2025 conference abstract) 2025
⚠ Conference abstract — not peer-reviewed DOI 10.1002/alz70857_104654
Cognitive screening instrument accuracy Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Pooled sensitivity 76% and specificity 83% for dementia, with 73% / 84% in primary care; the authors call it a practical screening tool while noting high or unclear risk of bias in patient selection and timing.

Pooled sensitivity and specificity of the Mini-Cog for dementia, MCI and cognitive impairment meta-analysis not stated To detect dementia (six studies, n = 4772), the Mini-Cog showed 76% sensitivity and 83% specificity. To detect MCI (two studies, n = 270), it showed 84% sensitivity and 79% specificity. To detect CI (eight studies, n = 2152), it had 67% sensitivity and 83% specificity. In the primary care setting, to detect either MCI, dementia, or CI (eight studies, n = 5620), the Mini-Cog demonstrated 73% sensitivity and 84% specificity PLOS ONE 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38483857
Cognitive screening instrument accuracy Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. The two-stage GPCOG had sensitivity 0.85 and specificity 0.86 against DSM-IV dementia, and was superior to the Abbreviated Mental Test.

Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of the GPCOG for dementia in general practice cross-sectional study 283 The two-stage method of administering the GPCOG (cognitive testing followed by informant questions if necessary)had a sensitivity of 0.85, a specificity of 0.86, a misclassification rate of 14%, and positive predictive value of 71.4% Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2002
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 11943052
Cost-effectiveness of multidomain prevention programme Care, carers and services Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for value for money: the intervention was modelled as dominant, saving JPY 452,826 per person and adding 0.08 QALYs over 35 years, with sensitivity analyses described as confirming robustness. A model extrapolating an 18-month trial.

Lifetime costs and QALYs of the J-MINT multidomain intervention versus usual care (35-year model) modelling study not stated Over 35 years, J-MINT was projected to achieve cost savings of JPY 452,826 per person and a gain of 0.08 QALYs The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41478834
Dementia care management / navigation Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

The community health worker programme achieved verified linkage to medical care in 16.7% of dyads versus none in the control arm. Caregiver outcomes were largely unchanged, with self-efficacy favouring control.

Clinic-verified linkage to medical services at 6 months (primary); caregiver psychosocial outcomes randomised trial 287 PLAN increased linkage to medical services versus control (16.7% vs 0%, chi-squared [df = 1] = 24.05, p < 0.001). Caregiver outcomes were largely unchanged, with self-efficacy favoring control Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42233272
Dementia care management / navigation Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the extended nursing role intervention: 74% fewer unmet needs and higher quality of life at six months, with a small QALY gain at about 1,425 EUR added cost; no effect on caregiver burden.

Unmet needs, quality of life, caregiver burden and cost per QALY at six months (advanced dementia care management by nurses in extended roles) randomised trial 417 PlwD receiving the intervention had 74% lower unmet needs (0.26, CI95%: 0.17 to 0.40, p < 0.001) and higher quality of life (0.04, CI95%: 0.01 to 0.07, p = 0.017) than controls. There was a gain in quality-adjusted life years (0.01, CI95%: -0.001 to 0.018) at slightly higher costs (1,425 EUR, CI95%: 638 to 2,211) Alzheimer's & Dementia 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41143334
Dementia care management / navigation Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the Care Ecosystem programme: total cost of care was $475.80 per member per month lower than matched controls at 12 months, with fewer emergency, outpatient and professional visits.

Total cost of care per member per month at 12 months versus propensity-matched controls cohort study 242 Care Ecosystem participants had significantly lower total cost of care at 12 months, mean savings of $475.80 per member per month compared with controls American Journal of Managed Care 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39146484
Dementia care management / navigation Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for collaborative dementia care management: fewer neuropsychiatric symptoms, lower caregiver burden, better mental health and 0.137 QALYs gained at no significant added cost (3186€ per QALY) over 36 months; no difference in antidementia drug use, overall quality of life or inappropriate medication.

Neuropsychiatric symptoms, caregiver burden, quality of life and cost per QALY at 36 months after 6 months of collaborative dementia care management randomised trial 428 Participants receiving CDCM showed significantly fewer behavioral and psychological symptoms (adjusted mean difference [AMD] in NPI score, -10.26 [95% CI, -16.95 to -3.58]; P = .003; Cohen d, -0.78 [95% CI, -1.09 to -0.46]) ... and lower caregiver burden (AMD in BIZA-D score, -0.59 [95% CI, -0.81 to -0.37]; P < .001; Cohen d, -0.71 [95% CI, -1.03 to -0.40]) ... The CDCM group gained QALYs (0.137 [95% CI, 0.000 to 0.274]; P = .049; Cohen d, 0.20 [95% CI, -0.09 to 0.40]) but had no significant increase in costs (437€ [-5438€ to 6313€] [US $476 (95% CI, -$5927 to $6881)]; P = .87; Cohen d, 0.07 [95% CI, -0.14 to 0.28]), resulting in a cost-effectiveness ratio of 3186€ (US $3472) per QALY JAMA Network Open 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38967926
Dementia screening / case finding Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

The outcome is how many diagnoses were made, not whether anyone was better off. The passive digital marker alone did not raise detection (AOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.63-1.11).

New dementia diagnosis within 12 months randomised trial 5,325 Adjusted OR for new dementia diagnosis 1.31 (95% CI 1.05-1.64) with QDRS plus passive digital marker vs usual care JAMA Network Open 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41212562
Health-system and payment model Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the benefit redesign: projected out-of-pocket drug spending fell 55% ($56 to $25) for low-income-subsidy beneficiaries and 25% ($772 to $576) for others, with larger reductions for people with 6-8 comorbidities.

Simulated annual out-of-pocket drug spending for Medicare beneficiaries with dementia under the 2025 Part D cost-sharing rules modelling study 1,677 we project average annual OOP drug expenditures among LIS beneficiaries with dementia to decrease from $56 to $25-representing a $31, or 55%, reduction. In contrast, among non-LIS beneficiaries, average OOP drug expenditures is projected to decrease from $772 to $576, a $196, or 25% reduction Value in Health 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39880200
Naturalistic driving behaviour (digital marker of MCI) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Driving features distinguished drivers with MCI from those with normal cognition (AUC 0.82), rising to 0.87 with demographics, APOE4 and cognition; drivers with MCI showed greater declines in trip frequency, night driving and route variety.

Discrimination of MCI from normal cognition by daily driving features, and longitudinal change in driving cohort study 298 Key features such as medium trip distance, speeding events, entropy, and maximum distance distinguished drivers with MCI from those with NC (area under the curve [AUC] 0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.89). Adding demographics, APOE ε4, and cognitive composite improved AUC to 0.87 (95% CI 0.81-0.93) Neurology 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41296993
Plasma proteomics diagnostic model (ProtAIDe-Dx) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Cross-validated balanced accuracy of 70-95% and AUC above 78% across the six conditions; the model is a development-stage tool with one external memory-clinic validation sample.

Classification accuracy for six dementia-associated conditions from plasma proteomics cross-sectional study 17,187 ProtAIDe-Dx achieves cross-validated balanced classification accuracy of 70-95% and area under the curve of >78% across all conditions Nature medicine 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41917159
Safety / firearm decision aid Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

The outcome is how prepared carers felt to decide about firearm access, not whether any injury was avoided.

Preparation for Decision Making score randomised trial 500 Preparation for Decision Making score +4.80 points (95% CI 0.53 to 9.07) vs control Annals of Internal Medicine 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39531391
Sleep intervention for carers/dyads Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for DREAMS START against treatment as usual: a 78% probability of being cost-effective at £20,000 per QALY, with cost and QALY differences individually non-significant. The clinical sleep result is in the table under its own row.

Cost per QALY gained (within-trial cost-utility) randomised trial 377 The mean incremental difference in QALYs per person with dementia was 0·016 more (95% CI 0·000 to 0·033) for the intervention group than for the TAU group, indicating no significant difference in quality of life. At a £20 000 per QALY gained decision threshold, there was a 78% probability that DREAMS START is cost-effective, compared with TAU The Lancet Healthy Longevity 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40412418
Sleep intervention for carers/dyads Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit Sleep Disorders Inventory at 8 months randomised trial 377 Adjusted mean difference in Sleep Disorders Inventory at 8 months: -4.70 (95% CI -7.65 to -1.74) The Lancet Healthy Longevity 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39366393
Cognitive training Cognitive activity Treatment Benefit
why

Which intervention helped depended on severity: stimulation for cognition at any severity, training for global cognition in mild dementia, rehabilitation for function in mild dementia and for carer burden. Heterogeneity was high.

Global cognitive function; functional ability; carer burden systematic review not stated Cognitive stimulation effective for cognitive function at any severity; individual and group cognitive training effective for global cognition in mild dementia; cognitive rehabilitation effective for functional abilities in mild dementia and most effective for reducing carer burden GeroScience 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39485657
Coffee, tea and flavonoid-rich foods Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

The association was strongest at moderate intake rather than the highest.

Incident dementia over a median 36.8 years cohort study 131,821 HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.76-0.89) for highest vs lowest quartile of caffeinated coffee JAMA 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41661604
Coffee, tea and flavonoid-rich foods Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

882 cases across five quintiles and several interaction strata, so the subgroup estimates rest on small numbers.

Incident dementia over a mean 9.2 years cohort study 121,986 AHR 0.72 (95% CI 0.57-0.89) for highest vs lowest flavodiet quintile JAMA Network Open 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39292460
Dietary pattern (general) Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

The association is reported in people who already have elevated Alzheimer's blood markers, which is the point of the study.

Incident dementia over a mean 8.4 years cohort study 1,865 Dementia HR 0.71 (95% CI 0.58-0.88) per SD of anti-inflammatory diet adherence among participants with elevated p-tau217 JAMA Network Open 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42348207
Dietary pattern (general) Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for a healthier plant-based diet: higher overall and healthful plant-based diet scores were associated with lower dementia risk, while a higher unhealthful plant-based diet score was associated with higher risk (pooled HR 1.42).

Incident dementia by plant-based diet index (overall, healthful and unhealthful) meta-analysis 207,981 higher scores in PDI and hPDI were associated with lower risk of dementia (highest vs. lowest tertile: pooled HR for PDI = 0.70, 95% CI, 0.53-0.92, p for trend <0.001; pooled HR for hPDI = 0.71, 0.48-1.06, p for trend = 0.03) ... higher uPDI was associated with higher dementia risk (highest vs. lowest tertile: pooled HR = 1.42, 1.19-1.70, p for trend <0.001). In the meta-analysis, individuals in the highest hPDI tertile had 21% lower dementia risk, and those in the highest uPDI tertile had 24% higher risk The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41564649
Dietary pattern (general) Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

Independent of overall diet quality. Substituting olive oil for margarine or mayonnaise was also associated with lower risk; substituting for butter or other vegetable oils was not.

Dementia-related death over 28 years cohort study 92,383 HR 0.72 (95% CI 0.64-0.81) for dementia-related death with ≥7 g/day olive oil vs never/rarely JAMA Network Open 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38709531
Dietary pattern (general) Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

Pooled observational studies only.

Dementia and Alzheimer's disease meta-analysis 65,955 Pooled OR 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.94) for dementia; cohort HR 0.84 (0.76-0.94); Alzheimer's OR 0.73 (0.62-0.85) Aging Clinical and Experimental Research 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38519775
Dietary pattern (general) Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

Observational. Points the opposite way to the randomised MIND diet trial.

Incident dementia meta-analysis 224,049 HR 0.83 per 3-point MIND-score increment (95% CI 0.72-0.95); highest vs lowest tertile HR 0.83 (0.76-0.90) JAMA Psychiatry 2023
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 37133875
Dietary pattern (general) Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

Significant on one adherence score (MEDAS, HR 0.77) but not the other (PYRAMID, HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.73-1.02).

Incident dementia over a mean 9.1 years cohort study 60,298 HR 0.77 (95% CI 0.65-0.91) for highest vs lowest MEDAS tertile BMC Medicine 2023
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 36915130
Dietary pattern (general) Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

Controls declined while the olive-oil arm held steady; the nut arm fell between the two. Cognitive follow-up was available for 334 of 447 enrolled.

Global cognition composite at median 4.1 years randomised trial 447 Global cognition composite: +0.05 (95% CI -0.11 to 0.21) olive-oil arm vs -0.38 (-0.57 to -0.18) control; P=0.005 JAMA Internal Medicine 2015
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 25961184
MIND diet Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

Observational. Points the opposite way to the randomised MIND diet trial.

Incident dementia meta-analysis 224,049 HR 0.83 per 3-point MIND-score increment (95% CI 0.72-0.95); highest vs lowest tertile HR 0.83 (0.76-0.90) JAMA Psychiatry 2023
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 37133875
Mediterranean diet Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

Pooled observational studies only.

Dementia and Alzheimer's disease meta-analysis 65,955 Pooled OR 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.94) for dementia; cohort HR 0.84 (0.76-0.94); Alzheimer's OR 0.73 (0.62-0.85) Aging Clinical and Experimental Research 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38519775
Mediterranean diet Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

Significant on one adherence score (MEDAS, HR 0.77) but not the other (PYRAMID, HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.73-1.02).

Incident dementia over a mean 9.1 years cohort study 60,298 HR 0.77 (95% CI 0.65-0.91) for highest vs lowest MEDAS tertile BMC Medicine 2023
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 36915130
Mediterranean diet Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

Controls declined while the olive-oil arm held steady; the nut arm fell between the two. Cognitive follow-up was available for 334 of 447 enrolled.

Global cognition composite at median 4.1 years randomised trial 447 Global cognition composite: +0.05 (95% CI -0.11 to 0.21) olive-oil arm vs -0.38 (-0.57 to -0.18) control; P=0.005 JAMA Internal Medicine 2015
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 25961184
Omega-3 / fish and fish oil Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

Dietary intake and blood levels, pooled from observational cohorts. The much larger supplement estimate (HR 0.36) comes from one cohort's self-selected supplement users, not from a trial.

All-cause dementia or cognitive decline meta-analysis 103,651 Dietary DHA intake RR 0.82 for dementia or cognitive decline; ADNI supplement users HR 0.36 (95% CI 0.18-0.72) for Alzheimer's American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2023
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 37028557
Multidomain lifestyle intervention Exercise and activity Prevention Benefit
why

Compared with flexible health advice, not with nothing; both groups improved.

Global cognitive composite (SD per year) over 2 years randomised trial 1,065 Between-group difference in global cognitive composite 0.11 SD per year (95% CI 0.06-0.15) The Lancet 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42442374
Multidomain lifestyle intervention Exercise and activity Prevention Benefit
why

Both groups improved; the structured programme improved more. The trial compares two active interventions, so there is no untreated comparison.

Global cognition (SD per year) over 2 years randomised trial 2,111 Structured 0.243 SD/year vs. self-guided 0.213 SD/year; difference 0.029 SD/year JAMA 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40720610
Multidomain lifestyle intervention Exercise and activity Prevention Benefit Neuropsychological test battery Z-score at 2 years randomised trial 1,260 NTB Z-score change 0.20 (intervention) vs. 0.16 (control); annual between-group difference 0.022 The Lancet 2015
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 25771249
Physical activity (general / dose) Exercise and activity Prevention Benefit
why

Concentrating activity into one or two days worked about as well as spreading it across the week.

Incident dementia cohort study 91,512 HR 0.73 (95% CI 0.60-0.89) for >300 min/week concentrated in 1-2 days vs <150 min/week Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40514301
Physical activity (general / dose) Exercise and activity Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for 12 weeks of cycle-ergometer exercise: putative glymphatic influx in the putamen and meningeal lymphatic vessel size and flow increased, and inflammation-related plasma proteins fell in step with the imaging changes. A mechanistic imaging result, not a cognitive outcome.

MRI measures of glymphatic influx and meningeal lymphatic vessel size and flow, and plasma inflammatory proteins, after 12 weeks of cycling in healthy volunteers cohort study not stated not established — pubmed abstract reports no numeric effect size. Nature Communications 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40204790
Physical activity (general / dose) Exercise and activity Prevention Benefit
why

The authors call the association weak (RR 0.97), and it was absent beyond 10 years of follow-up.

Cognitive impairment or decline meta-analysis 341,471 Pooled RR 0.97 (95% CI 0.97-0.99) for cognitive impairment/decline; no association beyond 10 years of follow-up JAMA Network Open 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38300618
Physical activity (general / dose) Exercise and activity Prevention Benefit
why

Pooled across 29 cohorts. The association weakened to HR 0.85 after maximal confounder adjustment and was not significant for low-intensity activity.

Incident Alzheimer's disease meta-analysis 2,068,519 Pooled HR 0.72 (95% CI 0.65-0.80) overall; HR 0.85 (95% CI 0.79-0.91) after maximal confounder adjustment; high-intensity activity HR 0.56 (95% CI 0.45-0.68); moderate-intensity HR 0.85 (95% CI 0.80-0.93); low-intensity HR 0.94 (95% CI 0.77-1.15, not significant) Ageing Research Reviews 2023
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 37979700
Physical activity (general / dose) Exercise and activity Prevention Benefit
why

The authors state the association held in longer follow-ups, which is their answer to the reverse-causation objection raised by the Whitehall II cohort.

Incident all-cause dementia and Alzheimer's disease meta-analysis 257,983 Pooled RR 0.80 (95% CI 0.77-0.84) for all-cause dementia British Journal of Sports Medicine 2022
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 35301183
Physical activity (general / dose) Exercise and activity Prevention Benefit
why

866 cases over a short follow-up for a disease with a long prodrome, so some of the association may be people already declining moving less.

Incident all-cause dementia over a median 6.9 years cohort study 78,430 HR 0.49 (95% CI 0.39-0.62) at 9,826 steps/day vs lowest activity JAMA Neurology 2022
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 36066874
Physical activity (general / dose) Exercise and activity Prevention Benefit
why

The largest effect for physical activity anywhere in this table by a wide margin. On 678 cases over 6.3 years, in a disease with a long prodrome, reverse causation is the more likely explanation for an effect that size.

Incident dementia over a median 6.3 years cohort study 84,854 Trend across MVPA categories HR 0.66 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.70). "The lowest risk was identified in individuals who performed more than 1200 MET/min/week, those who had 84% (95% CI 0.12 to 0.21) lower risk of incident dementia compared to those who performed < 300 MET/min/week." BMC Medicine 2021
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 34852818
Physical activity (general / dose) Exercise and activity Treatment Benefit
why

Pools 27 small trials in people who already have dementia, and reports a much larger effect (SMD 0.69) than the single largest such trial, DAPA, which found none.

Cognitive function meta-analysis 2,242 SMD 0.691 (95% CrI 0.373-1.039) at 650 MET-min/week; aerobic SMD 0.909 (0.495-1.362) at 660 MET-min/week BMC Geriatrics 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38824515
Resistance training Exercise and activity Prevention Benefit
why

The authors call the effect small (-0.18 points). Significant in women, not in men, on 91 randomised and 76 completing.

ADAS-Cog-Plus at 12 months randomised trial 91 ADAS-Cog-Plus mean difference -0.18 (95% CI -0.35 to -0.01; P=0.04) Alzheimer's & Dementia 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41795685
Resistance training Exercise and activity Prevention Benefit
why

Seven small trials; working memory did not improve (P=0.14).

General cognitive function and executive function meta-analysis not stated General cognition SMD 0.53 (P=0.04); executive function SMD 0.50 (P=0.0003) International Journal of Sports Medicine 2020
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 32599643
APOE genotype Genes (not modifiable) Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for carrying the deletion, present in 60% of African American ε4 homozygotes: it reduced the AD odds ratio and delayed onset in ε4/ε4 cases with local African ancestry at APOE, confirmed in All of Us, and it abolishes SPI1 repression at the site.

AD odds and age at onset in APOE ε4/ε4 carriers with versus without a 19 bp APOE enhancer deletion (African Americans) case-control study not stated not established — the abstract states the deletion reduces the ad odds ratio and delays onset but prints no figure; only the 60% carrier frequency is given. Nature Communications 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41629326
APOE genotype Genes (not modifiable) Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for carrying APOE2, which is associated with longer life irrespective of Alzheimer's status. The lifespan figures come from gene-targeted mice, not from the human cohort.

Lifespan / survival cohort study 24,661 Mice: "the median age at death was in the order of apoE2-TR (911 days) > apoE3 TR (825 days) > apoE4 TR (753 days) > Apoe KO (738 days)". In humans the abstract states only that "the association between APOE2 and longer lifespan persisted irrespective of AD status", without a numeric estimate. eLife 2020
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 33074098
Rare protective or risk variant (APOE3 Christchurch, APOE R145C, RELN, FN1) Genes (not modifiable) Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for one copy of the APOE3 Christchurch variant: median onset of cognitive impairment at 52 versus 47 years in matched PSEN1 E280A carriers without it, with preserved brain metabolism and fewer vascular amyloid features in the few imaged or autopsied. Not modifiable.

Age at onset of cognitive impairment in PSEN1 E280A carriers cohort study 1,077 the median age at the onset of cognitive impairment was 52 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 51 to 58), in contrast to a matched group of PSEN1 E280A carriers without the APOE3 Ch variant, among whom the median age at the onset was 47 years (95% CI, 47 to 49) New England Journal of Medicine 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38899694
Rare protective or risk variant (APOE3 Christchurch, APOE R145C, RELN, FN1) Genes (not modifiable) Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for carrying the rare FN1 variant rs140926439 in APOE ε4 homozygotes: odds of AD 0.29 and onset delayed 3.37 years in the 7185-person validation cohort, with zebrafish work suggesting fibronectin loss of function reduces gliosis. Not modifiable.

Alzheimer's disease case status and age at onset among APOE ε4 homozygotes case-control study 7,185 rs140926439 variant in FN1 was protective of AD (OR = 0.29; 95% CI [0.11, 0.78], P = 0.014) and delayed age at onset of disease by 3.37 years (95% CI [0.42, 6.32], P = 0.025) Acta Neuropathologica 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38598053
Hearing loss / hearing aids Hearing and vision Prevention Benefit
why

Confined to people who said the aid actually improved their hearing (HR 0.86); those reporting poor improvement showed nothing (HR 0.98).

Probable dementia over a mean 6.5 years cohort study 61,089 HR 0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.94) for hearing aid use; HR 0.86 (0.80-0.93) with effective use Cell Reports Medicine 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42127901
Hearing loss / hearing aids Hearing and vision Prevention Benefit
why

Mostly observational (25 of 31 studies), so people who take up hearing aids may differ from those who do not. The authors call for randomised trials — and ACHIEVE, the trial that followed, was null overall.

Long-term cognitive decline meta-analysis 137,484 HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.76-0.87) for cognitive decline with hearing aid use JAMA Neurology 2023
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 36469314
Vision impairment / cataract surgery Hearing and vision Prevention Benefit
why

Against untreated cataract. People who had surgery ended up at about the same risk as controls who never had cataracts (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.66-1.06), and there was no short-term gain in those already cognitively impaired.

Long-term cognitive decline / dementia meta-analysis 558,276 HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.72-0.78) for cognitive decline with surgery Ophthalmology 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38336283
Herpes zoster / shingles vaccination Infection and vaccination Prevention Benefit New dementia diagnoses over 5.5 years cohort study 232,124 -2.0 percentage points (95% CI -3.5 to -0.4) absolute reduction in new dementia diagnoses over 5.5 years The Lancet Neurology 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41579903
Herpes zoster / shingles vaccination Infection and vaccination Prevention Benefit
why

Regression discontinuity across a birth-date eligibility threshold, which makes confounding by health-seeking behaviour less likely than in a plain cohort comparison. Eligibility did not change uptake of other preventive services or other chronic-disease diagnoses, which is the check that makes the design convincing.

New dementia diagnoses over 7.4 years cohort study 101,219 "eligibility for HZ vaccination (ie, being born shortly after vs shortly before November 2, 1936) decreased the probability of receiving a new dementia diagnosis during 7.4 years by 1.8 percentage points (95% CI, 0.4-3.3 percentage points; P = .01)"; vaccination uptake rose 16.4 percentage points (95% CI 13.2-19.5) across the threshold JAMA 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40267506
Herpes zoster / shingles vaccination Infection and vaccination Prevention Benefit
why

Regression discontinuity across the 2 September 1933 eligibility threshold; stronger in women than men.

Probability of a new dementia diagnosis over 7 years cohort study not stated -3.5 percentage points (95% CI 0.6 to 7.1, P = 0.019) in 7-year dementia diagnosis probability; 20.0% relative reduction (95% CI 6.5-33.4) Nature 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40175543
Other vaccination (influenza, pneumococcal, general) Infection and vaccination Prevention Benefit
why

Pooled observational studies, so open to the confounding the natural-experiment studies were designed to avoid.

Any dementia meta-analysis 104,031,186 Influenza vaccination RR 0.87 (95% CI 0.77-0.99) for any dementia; pneumococcal vaccination RR 0.64 (95% CI 0.47-0.87) for Alzheimer's disease Age and Ageing 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41269248
APP antisense oligonucleotide (preclinical) Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for antisense oligonucleotides lowering APP in neurons derived from people with an APP duplication or trisomy 21: reduced APP, rescued endolysosome and autophagy dysfunction and fewer intracellular and extracellular amyloid-β aggregates. Cell-culture work with no human outcome.

APP protein, endolysosomal and autophagy function and amyloid-β aggregates in human stem-cell-derived neurons None not stated not established — pubmed abstract reports no numeric effect size. Brain 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38527856
Anti-amyloid (other modality) Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

Phase 1 target-engagement result in 19 people; no clinical outcome measured.

CSF sAPPbeta (surrogate) phase 1 trial 19 Single ascending dose 100 mg (9 patients): CSF sAPPbeta "-84.5% [1.3]" at month 1, "-61.1% [2.8]" at month 10. Multiple ascending dose 50 mg every 6 months (10 patients): "-63.7% (5.0)" at day 15 after the first dose, "-83.8% (2.3)" at month 1 after the second Alzheimer's & Dementia (AAIC 2025 conference abstract) 2025
⚠ Conference abstract — not peer-reviewed PMC12739694
Anti-amyloid antibody Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

Prespecified and post hoc re-analyses of a trial already reported elsewhere, so this is not independent evidence.

Progression between disease stages and to needing in-home support phase 3 trial not stated HR 0.67 for MCI-to-mild-dementia progression; HR 0.50 for mild-to-moderate; HR 0.74 for progression to needing in-home support Neurology: Clinical Practice 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42128444
Anti-amyloid antibody Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for lecanemab in mice: it significantly reduced amyloid pathology and neuritic damage, an effect absent with Fc-silenced antibody or without microglia despite intact plaque binding. Mouse work with no human outcome.

Amyloid pathology and neuritic damage in a human-microglia xenograft mouse model given lecanemab, Fc-silenced lecanemab, or lecanemab with microglia depleted None not stated not established — pubmed abstract reports no numeric effect size. Nature Neuroscience 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41286448
Anti-amyloid antibody Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

An initial negative opinion was reversed on re-examination, with use restricted to APOE4 heterozygotes and non-carriers. The EPAR describes ARIA as affecting more than 1 in 10 people without giving a percentage.

iADRS at 18 months, in the APOE4-restricted group regulatory decision 1,736 "after 18 months of treatment, the iADRs score worsened by 11 points in patients who received Kisunla and 13 points in those given placebo" European Medicines Agency 2025
⚠ Regulatory decision — not a study no DOI or PMID exists
Anti-amyloid antibody Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

Phase Ib/IIa biomarker result in 13 people; no cognitive outcome measured.

Amyloid PET and CSF biomarkers (surrogate) phase 2 trial 13 3.6 mg/kg cohort: "-89 centiloids after 12 weeks (n=13), and -107 centiloids after 28 weeks (n=12)" on amyloid PET; at week 25 CSF "total tau, phosphorylated tau181, and neurogranin were reduced by 30%, 34%, and 29%, respectively" Alzheimer's & Dementia (AAIC 2025 conference abstract) 2025
⚠ Conference abstract — not peer-reviewed PMC12740797
Anti-amyloid antibody Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the slower titration schedule against standard dosing, on the drug's own side effect. Amyloid reduction was comparable.

ARIA-E incidence at 24 weeks phase 3 trial 843 ARIA-E 13.7% (modified titration) vs 23.7% (standard) at 24 weeks Alzheimer's & Dementia 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40172303
Anti-amyloid antibody Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

An open-label extension: after 18 months everyone is on the drug, so the comparison is early-start versus delayed-start, not drug versus placebo.

Clinical decline over up to 36 months phase 3 trial not stated "ARIA rates were low after 6 months and not associated with long-term progression. Across clinical and HRQoL endpoints, lecanemab-treated participants continued to benefit through 36 months. Separation between early and delayed start was maintained between 18 and 36 months." Alzheimer's & Dementia 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41355080
Anti-amyloid antibody Medicines Treatment Benefit iADRS and CDR-SB at week 76 regulatory decision 1,736 Week 76 differences from placebo: iADRS 2.92 (p<0.0001); ADAS-Cog13 -1.33 (p=0.0006); ADCS-iADL 1.70 (p=0.0001); CDR-SB -0.70 (p<0.0001) U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2024
⚠ Regulatory decision — not a study no DOI or PMID exists
Anti-amyloid antibody Medicines Treatment Benefit CDR-SB (clinical progression) at 18 months regulatory decision 1,795 "Leqembi demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful reduction of decline from baseline to 18 months on the primary endpoint, the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes score, compared to placebo" — the notice gives no numeric CDR-SB difference U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2023
⚠ Regulatory decision — not a study no DOI or PMID exists
Anti-amyloid antibody Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

Less decline than placebo, alongside infusion reactions and ARIA.

CDR-SB at 18 months phase 3 trial 1,795 Adjusted mean CDR-SB change 1.21 (lecanemab) vs. 1.66 (placebo); difference -0.45 (95% CI -0.67 to -0.23, P<0.001) New England Journal of Medicine 2023
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 36449413
Anti-amyloid antibody Medicines Treatment Benefit iADRS at 76 weeks phase 3 trial 1,736 iADRS change at 76 weeks: -6.02 (95% CI -7.01 to -5.03) donanemab vs -9.27 (-10.23 to -8.31) placebo in the low/medium tau population (difference 3.25, 95% CI 1.88-4.62; P<.001), and -10.2 vs -13.1 in the combined population (difference 2.92, 95% CI 1.51-4.33). CDR-SB difference -0.67 (95% CI -0.95 to -0.40) JAMA 2023
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 37459141
Anti-amyloid antibody Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

Phase 1 dose-finding. The outcome is amyloid clearance; no cognitive outcome was measured.

Amyloid PET clearance (surrogate) randomised trial 41 "On 2,800 mg, every participant dropped below the amyloid positivity threshold within three months"; "After six months, plaque was dose-dependently reduced in all cohorts" Presented at AD/PD 2023 Conference (Gothenburg, Sweden); covered by ALZFORUM and NeurologyLive 2023
⚠ Conference abstract — not peer-reviewed no DOI or PMID exists
Anti-amyloid antibody Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

Benefit is on the surrogate marker only: the approval rested on amyloid reduction, not on confirmed clinical benefit, and the confirmatory trial was later terminated.

Amyloid PET (surrogate marker) regulatory decision not stated not established — the library recorded "amyloid-pet reduction of 71% (emerge) and 59% (engage), both p<0.0001". investors.biogen.com timed out on repeated attempts… U.S. Food and Drug Administration (announced via Biogen press release) 2021
⚠ Regulatory decision — not a study no DOI or PMID exists
Anti-tau therapy Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

Phase 1b safety and target-engagement result: adverse events were all mild or moderate with no serious events on MAPTRx, and CSF total tau fell dose-dependently by more than 50% in the two highest-dose groups. No clinical outcome was measured.

Safety (primary) and CSF total tau (exploratory target engagement) in mild Alzheimer's disease phase 1 trial 46 Adverse events were reported in 94% of MAPTRx-treated patients and 75% of placebo-treated patients; all were mild or moderate. No serious adverse events were reported in MAPTRx-treated patients. Dose-dependent reduction in the CSF total-tau concentration was observed with greater than 50% mean reduction from baseline at 24 weeks post-last dose in the 60 mg (four doses) and 115 mg (two doses) MAPTRx groups Nature Medicine 2023
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 37095250
Antihypertensives / BP lowering Medicines Prevention Benefit
why

Significant for MCI and for the MCI-or-dementia composite; not significant for probable dementia alone (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.72-1.02).

MCI and probable dementia over median 7 years randomised trial 9,361 Probable dementia: 8.5 vs. 10.2 per 1,000 person-years (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.72-1.02); MCI: HR 0.87 (95% CI 0.76-1.00); composite MCI-or-dementia: HR 0.89 (95% CI 0.79-0.99) Neurology 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39819096
Antihypertensives / BP lowering Medicines Prevention Benefit
why

A large drop in blood pressure (22/9 mmHg) and fewer serious adverse events in the intervention villages.

All-cause dementia over 48 months randomised trial 33,995 All-cause dementia RR 0.85 (95% CI 0.76-0.95) Nature Medicine 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40258956
Antihypertensives / BP lowering Medicines Prevention Benefit
why

Individual participant data from five double-blind placebo-controlled trials, which is the strongest design in this table for this exposure.

Incident dementia over a median 4.3 years meta-analysis 28,008 Adjusted OR 0.87 (95% CI 0.75-0.99) for incident dementia European Heart Journal 2022
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 36282295
Antihypertensives / BP lowering Medicines Prevention Benefit
why

Consistent across 14 trials (I-squared 0%) but small in absolute terms: 0.39 percentage points over about 4 years.

Incident dementia or cognitive impairment meta-analysis 96,158 OR 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.98); absolute risk reduction 0.39% over 4.1 years JAMA 2020
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 32427305
Antipsychotics (harms / discontinuation) Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for STOPPING the antipsychotic: discontinuers were hospitalised less than matched continuers.

Hospitalisation, pneumonia and urinary tract infection cohort study 4,222 All-cause hospitalisation HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.72-0.96); pneumonia hospitalisation HR 0.51 (0.29-0.90) Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42410659
Antipsychotics (harms / discontinuation) Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for discontinuation: tapering after 12 weeks lowered the 24-month absolute risk of delirium and fracture versus continuing, with no difference in stroke, pneumonia or death. Results were similar for abrupt discontinuation and after 24 weeks.

24-month risk of delirium, fracture, stroke, pneumonia and death after tapering or stopping antipsychotics versus continuing cohort study 24,822 Compared with continuation after 12 weeks of treatment, estimated risks of delirium and fracture under the tapering strategy corresponded to 24-month ARDs of -2·46% (95% CI -4·10 to -1·27) and -2·80% (-4·14 to -1·29), respectively. Estimated risks for stroke, pneumonia, and all-cause mortality were similar between strategies The lancet. Healthy longevity 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42302797
Cholinesterase inhibitor / memantine Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

Observational: 80% of residents were on no anti-dementia drug, so who gets prescribed and who does not may itself track prognosis.

All-cause mortality cohort study 25,358 Adjusted hazard ratios for mortality vs no anti-dementia drug: "HR: 0.826, 95%CI 0.769 to 0.888 for AChEI; 0.857, 95%CI 0.795 to 0.923 for memantine; 0.742, 95%CI 0.640 to 0.861 for AChEI plus memantine" Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38812028
Cholinesterase inhibitor / memantine Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

Cholinesterase inhibitors, not memantine: -0.39 MMSE points a year against -2.50 with no treatment. The mortality benefit held only in the first year. Registry data with weighting, not a trial.

MMSE decline per year; mortality cohort study 1,095 MMSE change: -0.39 points/year (95% CI -0.96 to 0.18) with cholinesterase inhibitors vs -2.49 (-4.02 to -0.97) with memantine and -2.50 (-4.28 to -0.73) with non-use. Mortality in the first year after diagnosis: adjusted HR 0.66 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.94) Alzheimer's & Dementia 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39177108
GLP-1 receptor agonist Medicines Prevention Benefit
why

Seven separate comparisons against seven other antidiabetic drugs, so the comparator is always another drug rather than no treatment.

First-time Alzheimer's diagnosis over 3 years cohort study 1,094,761 HR 0.33 (95% CI 0.21-0.51) vs. insulin; HR 0.59 (95% CI 0.37-0.95) vs. other GLP-1 agonists Alzheimer's & Dementia 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39445596
Gene therapy delivering APOE2 / APOE2-Christchurch (preclinical) Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for AAVrh.10 delivery of APOE2 with the Christchurch mutation in mice: both vectors suppressed amyloid, but only the Christchurch variant also suppressed tau tangles and glial activation in tau mice and outperformed plain APOE2 behaviourally. Mouse work with no human outcome.

Amyloid and tau pathology, glial activation and behaviour in APOE4-humanised mouse models None not stated not established — pubmed abstract reports no numeric effect size. Molecular Therapy 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39511891
Metformin / antidiabetic Medicines Prevention Benefit
why

Heterogeneity was near-total (I-squared 98.9%) and the estimate went to null in people newly diagnosed with diabetes (HR 1.01), which is where prevalent-user bias would be smallest.

Incident dementia meta-analysis 3,463,100 HR 0.76 (95% CI 0.65-0.91) vs non-users overall; HR 1.01 (0.81-1.27) in newly diagnosed diabetes Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39780315
Metformin / antidiabetic Medicines Prevention Benefit
why

Comparator is other oral antidiabetic drugs, not no treatment.

All-cause dementia and Parkinson's disease cohort study 358,862 All-cause dementia aHR 0.79 (95% CI 0.69-0.90) for SGLT2 inhibitor vs other oral antidiabetic drugs Neurology 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39292986
Metformin / antidiabetic Medicines Prevention Benefit
why

The exposure actually studied is STOPPING metformin early, which carried 21% higher dementia incidence than staying on it. Read as indirect support for metformin, not as a trial of it.

Incident dementia cohort study 41,346 HR 1.21 (95% CI 1.12-1.30) for dementia after early metformin termination JAMA Network Open 2023
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 37878309
Microglia / neuroinflammation target (preclinical) Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for peripheral cancer in AD mice: tumour-secreted cystatin-C bound amyloid oligomers and activated microglial TREM2, enabling degradation of existing plaques and rescuing cognition; the effect was abolished by microglial deletion or mutation of TREM2 or cystatin-C. Mouse work with no human outcome.

Amyloid plaque load and cognition in AD mice bearing peripheral tumours, and dependence on microglial TREM2 and cystatin-C None not stated not established — pubmed abstract reports no numeric effect size. Cell 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41576952
Microglia / neuroinflammation target (preclinical) Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for lowering PU.1 in microglia, which reduced the severity of amyloid pathology in mice; microglia-specific CD28 deficiency did the opposite and increased plaque load. Mouse work with no human outcome.

Severity of amyloid pathology in mouse models None not stated not established — pubmed abstract reports no numeric effect size. Nature 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41193812
Microglia / neuroinflammation target (preclinical) Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for deleting TIM-3 in microglia: it increased phagocytic activity, shifted microglia to the disease-associated state, reduced amyloid pathology and improved cognitive impairment in 5xFAD mice. Mouse work with no human outcome.

Microglial phagocytosis, amyloid pathology and cognition in 5xFAD mice after microglia-targeted deletion of TIM-3 (Havcr2) None not stated not established — pubmed abstract reports no numeric effect size. Nature 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40205047
Microglia / neuroinflammation target (preclinical) Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for blocking the ZBP1-RIPK1 axis: genetic deletion of Zbp1 or inhibition of RIPK1 attenuated neuroinflammation, amyloid pathology and behavioural deficits in AD mice, after showing that amyloid-induced oxidised mitochondrial DNA forms Z-DNA sensed by ZBP1 in microglia. Mouse work with no human outcome.

Neuroinflammation, amyloid pathology and behavioural deficits in an AD mouse model after Zbp1 deletion or RIPK1 inhibition None not stated not established — pubmed abstract reports no numeric effect size. Immunity 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40902587
Microglia / neuroinflammation target (preclinical) Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for removing the granzyme K-producing CD103-negative CD8+ T cells: their ablation ameliorated cognitive decline and reduced neuropathology in 3xTg-AD mice, and granzyme K caused neuronal dysfunction and tau hyperphosphorylation via PAR-1. Mouse and cell work with no human outcome.

Cognitive decline and neuropathology in 3xTg-AD mice after ablation of brain CD103-negative CD8+ T cells, and granzyme K-PAR-1 neurotoxicity in cells None not stated not established — pubmed abstract reports no numeric effect size. Nature Communications 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40993111
Microglia / neuroinflammation target (preclinical) Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for inhibiting C1q, C3 or the microglial receptor CR3, which reduced phagocytic microglia and early synapse loss; C1q was necessary for soluble amyloid-beta oligomers to damage synapses. Mouse work with no human outcome.

Early synapse loss in Alzheimer mouse models None not stated not established — pubmed abstract reports no numeric effect size. Science 2016
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 27033548
Microglia / neuroinflammation target (preclinical) Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for NLRP3 or caspase-1 deficiency, which largely protected the mice from spatial memory loss and reduced amyloid deposition; the human data are limited to raised active caspase-1 in post-mortem MCI and Alzheimer brains.

Spatial memory loss and amyloid deposition in APP/PS1 mice None not stated not established — pubmed abstract reports no numeric effect size. Nature 2013
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 23254930
Psychotropics for agitation / psychosis Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

The NPI-C agitation/aggression measure did not reach significance (p=0.094).

Pittsburgh Agitation Scale over 3 weeks phase 2 trial 75 PAS decline difference -0.74/week (p=0.015, ES 0.53); NPI-C A/A -1.26/week (p=0.094, ES 0.36) The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41350162
Psychotropics for agitation / psychosis Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

The authors describe the reduction as small (-1.32 points).

NPI apathy score at 6 weeks phase 2 trial 94 NPI apathy change -1.32 points (95% CI -2.43 to -0.21) vs placebo The Lancet Neurology 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39862881
Psychotropics for agitation / psychosis Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

A post hoc dementia subgroup of a randomised-withdrawal trial that was not designed or powered for it; 46 randomised responders. The authors say to read it cautiously.

Psychosis relapse over up to 26 weeks phase 3 trial 76 Psychosis relapse HR 0.031 (95% CI 0.010-0.103) vs placebo among 46 randomised responders BMC Neurology 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41286676
Psychotropics for agitation / psychosis Medicines Treatment Benefit
why

Both doses beat placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events were more common than placebo (84.6% at 2 mg, 76.8% at 1 mg, 73.8% placebo).

Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory at week 10 phase 3 trial not stated CMAI change vs placebo: -7.2 (95% CI -10.0 to -4.3) at 2 mg; -3.7 (95% CI -6.8 to -0.7) at 1 mg Alzheimer's & Dementia 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39369280
SGLT2 inhibitor Medicines Prevention Benefit
why

For SGLT2 inhibitors specifically: HR 0.86 (95% CI 0.79-0.94) against DPP4 inhibitors, and HR 0.70 in the as-treated analysis.

Incident dementia cohort study not stated SGLT2i vs DPP4i HR 0.86 (95% CI 0.79-0.94); GLP1-RA vs DPP4i HR 0.95 (0.87-1.04) Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41420258
Statins / lipid-lowering Medicines Prevention Benefit
why

Benefit was confined to APOE4 carriers (HR 0.60) and absent in non-carriers (HR 0.96). Observational, and it disagrees with the larger target-trial emulation that found nothing.

Incident clinical Alzheimer's disease and cognitive decline cohort study 4,807 Alzheimer's HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.70-0.94) overall; 0.60 (0.49-0.74) in APOE ε4 carriers; 0.96 (0.82-1.12) in non-carriers Neurology 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38447103
Education / cognitive reserve Sleep, mood and social life Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for MORE education. Up to a quarter of the effect ran through midlife vascular risk factors, and the authors say treating those factors would not close the educational gap.

Incident dementia cohort study 13,368 8-44% lower dementia risk with higher education vs grade school; up to 25% mediated by midlife vascular risk factors Annals of Neurology 2023
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 36966451
Education / cognitive reserve Sleep, mood and social life Prevention Benefit
why

Education and job complexity each contributed independently; about 28% of the education effect ran through occupation.

Dementia-free survival time meta-analysis 10,195 Education and occupational complexity independently associated with longer dementia-free survival (28% of education effect mediated by occupation) Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 2022
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 34776437
Education / cognitive reserve Sleep, mood and social life Prevention Benefit
why

Effect held over and above measured Alzheimer's pathology, which is the point of the reserve idea.

Incident MCI or dementia meta-analysis not stated "High CR was related to a 47% reduced relative risk of MCI or dementia (pooled-hazard ratio: 0.53 [0.35, 0.81]), with residual-based CR reducing risk by 62% and proxy-based CR by 48%." Neuropsychology Review 2021
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 33415533
Music therapy Sleep, mood and social life Treatment Benefit
why

Improves depressive symptoms (moderate certainty) and overall behavioural problems (low certainty). No effect on agitation (SMD -0.05, 95% CI -0.27 to 0.17) and no evidence of long-term effects. Sits against the null MIDDEL trial on the same exposure.

Depressive symptoms at end of treatment meta-analysis 1,720 Depressive symptoms SMD -0.23 (95% CI -0.42 to -0.04); agitation SMD -0.05 (95% CI -0.27 to 0.17) Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40049590
Sleep Sleep, mood and social life Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for normal sleep versus sleep deprivation, on a clearance measure — not on cognition, which this trial did not measure.

Overnight brain-to-plasma clearance of amyloid-beta and tau randomised trial 39 Additional variance explained by the physiological predictor model in the sleep condition: "between 49.1% (Abeta40) to 56.0% (Abeta42)" in amyloid-positive participants and "between 71.3% (p-tau181) to 97.8% (Abeta40)" in amyloid-negative participants Nature Communications 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41593094
Social isolation / loneliness Sleep, mood and social life Prevention Benefit
why

Significant only for contact measured at age 60, not at 50 or 70. The authors note that keeping up contact may itself be a marker of cognitive reserve rather than a cause of it.

Incident dementia over 28 years cohort study 10,228 HR 0.88 per SD higher social contact frequency at age 60 (95% CI 0.79-0.98) PLoS Medicine 2019
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 31374073

How this table was built, and where it is weak →