Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Every row

Showing 51 of 382 rows. One row per study per exposure: a study that tested two different things appears twice, once for each.

Scroll the table sideways to see every column.

Research and outcomes, 51 rows. Every row links to its source.
Exposure Question Direction Outcome measured Design People Effect size, as the source reported it Source
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. The estimated age at plasma %p-tau217 positivity predicted age at symptom onset (adjusted R2 0.337-0.612) with a median absolute error of 3.0-3.7 years, which the authors call acceptable for trials but not yet for individual clinical use.

Predicted age at onset of Alzheimer's symptoms from plasma %p-tau217 clock models cohort study 603 The estimated age at plasma %p-tau217 positivity was associated with the age at onset of AD symptoms (adjusted R2 of 0.337-0.612) with a median absolute error of 3.0-3.7 years Nature medicine 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41714746
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Stand-alone plasma p-tau217 gave 81% accuracy and 79% PPV; confirming positives with PET or CSF raised both to 91% while cutting PET scans needed to find 100 amyloid-positive people from 536 to 124. Immunoassays matched mass spectrometry on PPV but had lower accuracy.

Accuracy and positive predictive value for amyloid positivity (CSF or PET) in cognitively unimpaired people, stand-alone and in a two-step workflow cross-sectional study 2,916 As a stand-alone test, plasma p-tau217 achieved a positive predictive value (PPV) of 79% (95% CI, 74-84) and an overall accuracy of 81% (95% CI, 80-82). In a 2-step workflow, the PPV and accuracy significantly increased to 91% (95% CI, 86-95). While this approach required screening of 677 individuals with plasma p-tau217 to identify 100 Aβ-positive individuals, compared to 536 participants when using PET alone, it reduced the need for PET testing to 124 JAMA Neurology 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40952756
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Combined plasma %p-tau217 and Aβ42/40 detected abnormal CSF amyloid status (AUC 0.949) and each predicted rising amyloid PET over time in people who started below the positivity threshold, replicated in two further cohorts; p-tau231 and GFAP added no clear independent value.

Prediction of subsequent brain amyloid accumulation (PET/CSF) in cognitively unimpaired people with subthreshold amyloid cohort study 983 a combination of plasma %p-tau217 and Aβ42/40 showed better performance (area under the curve = 0.949; 95% CI, 0.929-0.970; P <.02) than individual biomarkers ... longitudinal Aβ-PET (%p-tau217: β = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48-0.87; Aβ42/40: β = -0.33; 95% CI, -0.51 to -0.15; %p-tau217 × Aβ42/40: β = -0.31; 95% CI, -0.44 to -0.18; P < .001) JAMA Neurology 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39068669
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. All four assays (Lumipulse, Johnson & Johnson, ALZpath, NULISA) gave statistically equivalent AUCs of 0.84-0.90 for amyloid positivity, with cross-platform correlations of 0.40-0.86.

Cross-assay agreement and AUC for amyloid PET positivity across four p-tau217 immunoassays cross-sectional study 344 All four p-tau217 assays exhibited moderate to strong cross-platform correlations (Spearman correlations of 0.40–0.86), and statistically equivalent AUCs (of 0.84–0.90) for determining Aβ positivity Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41652516
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Among p-tau217-positive patients, a positive eMTBR-tau243 identified clinically established Alzheimer's disease with 81% accuracy and predicted faster cognitive decline and tau accumulation.

Classification of established Alzheimer's disease by plasma eMTBR-tau243 among %p-tau217-positive patients cohort study 572 194 (55%) of 350 %p-tau217-positive patients were also positive for eMTBR-tau243, with an accuracy of 81% (95% CI 76-84), PPV 84% (95% CI 78-88), negative predictive value (NPV) 77% (95% CI 68-82), and sensitivity 82% (95% CI 76-87) for established Alzheimer's disease, in cross-sectional analyses The Lancet. Neurology 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41864233
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Subgroup-specific optimal cutoffs and a double-cutoff strategy both improved accuracy over the standard single cutoff, most markedly in chronic kidney disease (0.65 to 0.83) and anaemia.

Accuracy of plasma p-tau217 for amyloid PET positivity under standard, subgroup-optimal and double cutoffs in people with kidney disease, abnormal BMI or anaemia cross-sectional study 2,571 In the UGOT cohort, the optimal cutoff improved diagnostic accuracy compared with the standard single cutoff, particularly in CKD and anemia (CKD: from 0.65; 95% CI, 0.57-0.72; to 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.89; anemia: from 0.80; 95% CI, 0.76-0.84; to 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82-0.90), with consistent findings in the Roche cohort JAMA neurology 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41627837
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. The prespecified APS2 cut point gave 91% accuracy, 90% sensitivity and 92% specificity against amyloid PET.

Agreement with amyloid PET in an independent cohort (ADNI) cross-sectional study 191 Concordance with amyloid PET was high (AUC-ROC 0.95 (95% CI): 0.93-0.98); 54% of participants had a positive APS2. The previously validated APS2 cut point yielded an overall accuracy of 91% (95% CI: 86-94%), sensitivity 90% (95% CI: 83-94%) and specificity 92% (95% CI: 84-96%) npj Dementia 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40917102
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Plasma p-tau217 detected amyloid PET positivity with 82% sensitivity and 86% specificity, comparable to CSF p-tau217; less sensitive for tau PET.

Sensitivity and specificity for amyloid and tau PET positivity (pooled) meta-analysis not stated Plasma p-tau217 showed 82% sensitivity for detecting amyloid and 83% for tau, with 86% and 83% specificity, respectively. CSF p-tau217 had 79% sensitivity for amyloid and 91% for tau, with 91% and 84% specificity Alzheimer's & Dementia 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39711334
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. AUC 0.93-0.96; accuracy 89-91% in secondary care and 85% in primary care, lower (83%) at age 80 or older; a two-cutoff approach raised accuracy to 92-94% at the cost of 12-17% intermediate results.

Diagnostic accuracy for Alzheimer pathology (CSF-defined) in secondary and primary care cross-sectional study 1,767 Plasma p-tau217 detected AD pathology with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.93-0.96. In secondary care, the accuracies were 89-91%, the positive predictive values 89-95% and the negative predictive values 77-90%. In primary care, the accuracy was 85%, the positive predictive values 82% and the negative predictive values 88%. Accuracy was lower in participants aged ≥80 years (83%) Nature Medicine 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40205199
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Plasma p-tau217 was the best-performing marker (88.1% sensitivity, 88.7% specificity, AUROC 91.1%, moderate certainty), ahead of p-tau181 and p-tau231; about 90% of studies were at high risk of bias.

Pooled sensitivity, specificity and AUROC for biologically defined Alzheimer's disease meta-analysis 29,625 Plasma p-tau217 was the highest-performing biomarker for identifying biologically defined Alzheimer's disease, with pooled sensitivity of 88·1% (95% CI 86·7-89·5, moderate certainty of evidence), specificity of 88·7% (87·4-89·9, moderate certainty of evidence), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 91·1% (88·9-92·4, moderate certainty of evidence), and diagnostic odds ratio of 50·7 (40·6-63·4). p-tau181 pooled sensitivity was 80·5% (78·4-82·4, low certainty of evidence), specificity was 76·4% (74·1-78·6, low certainty of evidence), AUROC was 81·5% (80·2-82·9, low certainty of evidence) The Lancet Neurology 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40818474
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. The Pitt-p-tau217 assay separated PSEN1 carriers from controls (AUC 0.94) and amyloid PET-positive from -negative cognitively normal adults (AUC up to 0.84), equivalent to the ALZpath assay.

Classification accuracy of a new p-tau217 assay against PSEN1 carrier status and amyloid PET cross-sectional study 363 Pitt-p-tau217 differentiated neuropathologically confirmed PSEN1 mutation carriers from controls with area under the curve (AUC) = 0.94, and amyloid beta (Aβ) positron emission tomography (PET)-positive from Aβ PET-negative cognitively normal older adults with AUC up to 0.84, equivalent to ALZpath-p-tau217 results. Both Pitt-p-tau217 and ALZpath-p-tau217 were slightly elevated in tau PET-positive versus tau PET-negative participants. Between-assay correlations were up to 0.93 Alzheimer's & Dementia 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40665482
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. All p-tau217 tests detected abnormal amyloid PET (AUC 0.91-0.96) and tau PET (0.94-0.97); the mass-spectrometry %p-tau217 ratio was best (accuracy 0.93 versus 0.83-0.88 for immunoassays) and is proposed as a stand-alone confirmatory test, with immunoassays better suited to triage.

Accuracy of five plasma p-tau217 tests for amyloid PET and tau PET status, benchmarked against CSF tests cohort study 998 All plasma p-tau217 tests exhibited a high ability to detect abnormal Aβ-PET [area under the curve (AUC) range: 0.91-0.96] and tau-PET (AUC range: 0.94-0.97) ... For detecting Aβ-PET status, %p-tau217WashU had an accuracy of 0.93 (immunoassays: 0.83-0.88), sensitivity of 0.91 (immunoassays: 0.84-0.87) and a specificity of 0.94 (immunoassays: 0.85-0.89) Brain 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39468767
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. The Lumipulse plasma p-tau217/Aβ42 ratio reached AUC 0.963-0.966 for amyloid PET and 0.947-0.974 for tau PET, equivalent to CSF tests and better than plasma p-tau217 alone, with fewer intermediate results.

Diagnostic accuracy for abnormal amyloid PET and tau PET in a clinic and a community cohort cross-sectional study 512 Plasma p-tau217/Aβ42 exhibited high performance for abnormal statuses of Aβ PET (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.963 to 0.966) and tau PET (AUC: 0.947 to 0.974) ... The p-tau217/Aβ42 ratio had a lower intermediate percentage than p-tau217 alone in both clinic (10.6% vs 13.0%) and community (16.5% vs 31.4%) cohorts Alzheimer's & Dementia 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40156286
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Plasma p-tau217/Aβ42 had the highest accuracy (0.88 in Black and 0.91 in White participants) and fewest intermediate results, with no difference in classification by race.

Accuracy for amyloid PET positivity in people who self-identify as Black or White cross-sectional study 1,135 In the test set, plasma p-tau217/Aβ42 had the highest accuracy (pBlack: 0.88, pWhite: 0.91) and lowest proportion of intermediate classifications (≤0.16), with no classification difference by race (odds ratio [OR] = 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.66-2.95, p = 0.33) Alzheimer's & Dementia 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40801297
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Plasma p-tau217 identified symptomatic AD with 95% sensitivity and 82% specificity (86% with the Aβ42 ratio) and tracked CSF biomarkers closely (AUC 0.94-0.96); reduced kidney function raised levels in patients without AD.

Sensitivity and specificity for symptomatic AD, and agreement with CSF biomarkers, in a tertiary outpatient memory clinic cross-sectional study 509 Plasma p-tau217 distinguished patients with diagnoses of symptomatic AD with 95% sensitivity and 82% specificity. Integration of Aβ42 measurements (p-tau217/Aβ42) incrementally improved specificity (86%). Plasma p-tau217 and p-tau217/Aβ42 concentrations closely associated with established CSF biomarkers of AD (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.94 and 0.96, respectively) Alzheimer's & Dementia 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40476540
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. The APS2 blood test reached AUC 0.96-0.97 and 88-92% accuracy, and its 91% accuracy for clinical AD beat primary care physicians (61%) and dementia specialists (73%).

Diagnostic accuracy for Alzheimer pathology (CSF-defined), and for clinical AD versus physicians' assessment cross-sectional study 1,213 the AUC was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.99) when the APS2 was used, the PPV was 91% (95% CI, 87%-96%), and the NPV was 92% (95% CI, 87%-96%) [primary care, single batch]; Primary care physicians had a diagnostic accuracy of 61% (95% CI, 53%-69%) for identifying clinical AD after clinical examination, cognitive testing, and a computed tomographic scan vs 91% (95% CI, 86%-96%) using the APS2. Dementia specialists had a diagnostic accuracy of 73% (95% CI, 68%-79%) vs 91% (95% CI, 88%-95%) using the APS2 JAMA 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39068545
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. APS2 gave AUC 0.94 and 88% agreement with amyloid PET, with similar performance by ethnicity, sex, age and APOE4 status.

Agreement with amyloid PET (brain amyloidosis) cross-sectional study 583 The AUC-ROC for the PrecivityAD2 test output, the Amyloid Probability Score 2, was 0.94, yielding 88% agreement with amyloid PET Alzheimer's & Dementia 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38491912
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. The ALZpath plasma p-tau217 immunoassay reached AUC 0.92-0.96 for amyloid and 0.93-0.97 for tau across three cohorts, comparable with CSF, and a three-range cut-off cut confirmatory testing by about 80%.

Accuracy for abnormal amyloid and tau pathology (PET or CSF) and longitudinal change cohort study 786 High accuracy was observed in identifying elevated Aβ (area under the curve [AUC], 0.92-0.96; 95% CI, 0.89-0.99) and tau pathology (AUC, 0.93-0.97; 95% CI, 0.84-0.99) across all cohorts. These accuracies were comparable with CSF biomarkers in determining abnormal PET signal. The detection of abnormal Aβ pathology using a 3-range reference yielded reproducible results and reduced confirmatory testing by approximately 80% JAMA Neurology 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38252443
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Plasma p-tau217 identified amyloid positivity with AUC 0.94; a two-cut-point rule sent only 17% for CSF or PET (sensitivity 0.94, specificity 0.86), and among amyloid-positive people it identified high tau load (AUC 0.92), potentially avoiding 56.9% of tau-PET scans.

Identification of amyloid positivity and of high tau-PET load (to select candidates for anti-amyloid antibodies) cohort study 912 plasma p-tau217 was most strongly associated with Aβ positivity (test-set area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90-0.97) ... This procedure had an overall sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.98) and a specificity of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77-0.95) ... At a false-negative rate less than 10%, the use of plasma p-tau217 could avoid 56.9% of tau-PET scans needed to identify high tau PET among Aβ-positive participants JAMA Neurology 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38048096
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. A blood model of p-tau217, age and APOE ε4 (AUC 89.3% development, 94.3% validation) used to triage patients gave 88-92% overall accuracy while cutting confirmatory CSF tests by 61-86%.

Accuracy for amyloid PET status and reduction in confirmatory CSF tests with a two-step plasma p-tau217 workflow cohort study 348 Depending on whether lenient, moderate or stringent thresholds were used in step 1, the two-step workflow overall accuracy for detecting Aβ-PET status was 88.2%, 90.5% and 92.0%, respectively, while reducing the number of necessary CSF tests by 85.9%, 72.7% and 61.2%, respectively Nature Aging 2023
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 37653254
Blood biomarkers (GFAP, NfL, p-tau181) for staging and prognosis Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for disclosing the blood panel during multidisciplinary meetings: median diagnostic confidence rose from 80% to 90%, though the suspected etiology changed in only 5% of patients and the syndrome diagnosis in 1%. Against CSF/PET, high- and low-probability results identified 76% of amyloid positives and 85% of negatives.

Change in clinician diagnostic confidence and in syndrome or etiological diagnosis after disclosure of a plasma biomarker panel (p-tau181, GFAP, NfL) cohort study 450 Median (IQR) diagnostic confidence in the total cohort increased from 80% (70%-90%) to 90% (70%-90%) after BBM disclosure (P < .001), increasing in 207 patients (46%), unchanged in 175 patients (39%), and decreasing in 68 patients (15%). Following BBM disclosure, syndrome diagnoses were revised in 6 patients (1%) and primary etiology was revealed in 23 patients (5%) JAMA Network Open 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42593792
Blood biomarkers (GFAP, NfL, p-tau217) for staging and prognosis Care, carers and services Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for the blood test's prognostic performance: plasma p-tau217 predicted cognitive decline and progression to MCI as well as tau PET (R2 0.33 vs 0.34; HR 1.57 vs 1.61), and using the blood test first cut the number needed to screen for a trial by 94%. A prognostic-performance result, not a health outcome.

Prediction of future cognitive decline and progression to MCI: plasma p-tau217 head-to-head with tau PET cohort study 1,474 plasma p-tau217 and medial temporal lobe tau-PET signal display similar associations with cognitive decline on a global cognitive composite test (R2PET = 0.34 versus R2plasma = 0.33, Pdifference = 0.653) and with progression to mild cognitive impairment (hazard ratio (HR)PET = 1.61 (1.48-1.76) versus HRplasma = 1.57 (1.43-1.72), Pdifference = 0.322) ... Sequential selection using plasma phosphorylated tau at threonine 217 (p-tau217) and then tau-PET reduced the number of participants required for a clinical trial by 94%, compared to a 76% reduction when using plasma p-tau217 alone Nature Aging 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40155777
Blood biomarkers (GFAP, NfL, p-tau217) for staging and prognosis Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. The two-marker plasma model matched PET-based stages with a C index of 0.91 in both the derivation and validation cohorts, tracked clinical stage (C index 0.84-0.86) and aligned with autopsy ADNC (AUC 0.96), improving on %p-tau217 alone at the intermediate stage.

Concordance of a plasma %p-tau217 plus eMTBR-tau243 staging model with amyloid/tau PET-based biological stages, clinical stage and autopsy-confirmed AD pathology cohort study 1,028 A plasma-based model with %p-tau217 and eMTBR-tau243 was derived, which demonstrated high concordance with established PET-based stages (C index, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.92) and was associated with clinical stage within the AD continuum (C index, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.82-0.86). In the validation cohort, concordance with PET-based stages was high (C index, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.87-0.94), as was concordance with clinical stage (C index, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82-0.89) ... In the neuropathology subsample, plasma staging was strongly aligned with autopsy-confirmed AD pathology using the Alzheimer Disease Neuropathologic Change scale (area under the curve, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.91-1.00) JAMA Neurology 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42189519
Blood biomarkers (GFAP, NfL, p-tau217) for staging and prognosis Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Plasma Aβ42/40, p-tau217, p-tau181 and NfL classified AD with AUC 83% and FTLD with 88%, consistent across countries, rising to 89% and 95% when combined with neuroimaging patterns and cognitive measures.

Discrimination of AD and frontotemporal lobar degeneration from controls by plasma AT(N) biomarkers in a multinational Latin American cohort cross-sectional study 605 Classification models achieved receiver operating characteristic areas under the curve (ROC AUCs) of 83% for AD and 88% for FTLD ... Biomarker alterations combined with disease-specific neuroimaging patterns and cognitive measures further improved accuracy (ROC AUCs of 89% for AD and 95% for FTLD) Nature Aging 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41688826
Blood biomarkers (GFAP, NfL, p-tau217) for staging and prognosis Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Serum GFAP tracked post-mortem tau pathology independently of amyloid, correlated negatively with brain weight and cognition, correlated with astrocyte reactivity in tissue, and separated neuropathologically confirmed AD from non-AD dementias with AUC 0.91.

Correlation of serum GFAP with post-mortem tau pathology, brain weight and astrocyte reactivity, and discrimination of autopsy-confirmed AD from non-AD dementia cohort study 139 an association between serum GFAP level and post-mortem tau pathology (β = 12.85; P < 0.001) that was independent of amyloid deposits (β = 13.23; P = 0.02) ... a negative correlation was observed between pre-mortem serum GFAP and brain weight at post-mortem (r = -0.35; P < 0.001) ... its discriminative power (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve at baseline = 0.91) in differentiating neuropathologically-confirmed Alzheimer's disease dementias from non-Alzheimer's disease dementias Brain 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38634687
CSF alpha-synuclein seed amplification assay Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Smell testing followed by CSF seed amplification only in those with reduced smell predicted brain Lewy body pathology with 94% accuracy and cut CSF testing by 43%; in a living cohort it predicted CSF assay status with 79% accuracy.

Accuracy for autopsy-confirmed Lewy body pathology and reduction in confirmatory CSF testing cohort study 1,567 Among 358 autopsied participants, the two-step workflow predicted brain LBP with high accuracy overall (94%), and within clinical subgroups (clinical parkinsonism=95%; clinical Alzheimer's disease [AD]=94%; clinically unimpaired [CU]=93%). It reduced the need for confirmatory CSF testing by 43% overall (23% clinical parkinsonism; 35% clinical AD; 80% CU). In an independent in vivo cohort (N=1209), the workflow predicted CSF α-syn SAA status with 79% accuracy and reduced CSF testing by 26% Nature Communications 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40764485
Carer psychosocial / skills intervention Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Benefit was larger for younger, male and non-spousal carers. The largest single effect (training the person with dementia) rests on 10 observations and the authors call it promising rather than definitive.

Carer anxiety and depression meta-analysis not stated "Interventions generally showed a significant reduction in anxiety and depression with varied effects on SWB [subjective well-being]" across 175 studies and 342 intervention treatments Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40550226
Carer psychosocial / skills intervention Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

A pilot designed to test feasibility; 68 carers and a 2-week outcome.

Pre-death grief at 2 weeks randomised trial 68 Pre-death grief Cohen d = -0.38 (mean change -3.29, SD 8.64, p=0.03) at 2 weeks JAMA Network Open 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42018322
Carer psychosocial / skills intervention Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Digital psychological interventions reduced caregiver burden and improved self-efficacy and quality of life; the effect on depressive symptoms was not statistically significant (P = .06).

Caregiver burden (primary); depression, self-efficacy and quality of life meta-analysis 750 digital psychological interventions significantly reduced caregiver burden [Standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.21, 95% CI: -0.35 to -0.07; P = .003] and improved self-efficacy (SMD = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.61, P = .001) and quality of life (SMD = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.91, P < .001). But digital psychological interventions have no statistically significant in alleviating depressive symptoms (P = .06) Age and ageing 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41505195
Carer psychosocial / skills intervention Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

At the 1-month comparison the automated self-guided programme reduced depression and burden and increased positive gains versus waitlist; anxiety did not differ. Group differences mostly disappeared once controls received the programme.

Caregiver depression (PHQ-9) at 1 month versus waitlist (primary); anxiety, burden and positive gains randomised trial 274 At 1-month follow-up, coinciding with exclusive access to PDC30, intervention caregivers showed significant improvements in depression (d = -0.37), burden (d = -0.34), and positive gains (d = 0.42) The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41644333
Carer psychosocial / skills intervention Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

A factorial trial of components: the mindfulness component carried the benefit and amplified the others.

Carer depressive symptoms (PHQ-9) at 12 months randomised trial 250 Mindfulness component: PHQ-9 depressive symptoms β = -2.13 (95% CI -2.85 to -1.38) at 12 months JAMA Network Open 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40094667
Carer psychosocial / skills intervention Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for NIDUS-Family: an 89% probability of cost-effectiveness from a health and social care perspective (87% societal) and £8,934 (37%) lower average costs, though the cost difference's confidence interval includes zero.

Probability of cost-effectiveness at £20,000-30,000 per QALY and 12-month costs versus goal setting and routine care randomised trial 302 At both a £20 000 and £30 000 decision threshold, there was an 89% probability that NIDUS-Family was cost-effective compared with usual care from a health and social care perspective, and an 87% probability from a societal perspective. Intervention participants accrued on average £8934 (37%) less in costs than control participants (95% CI -£59 460 to £41 592) The Lancet Healthy Longevity 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39978389
Carer psychosocial / skills intervention Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

The outcome is how prepared carers felt to decide about firearm access, not whether any injury was avoided.

Preparation for Decision Making score randomised trial 500 Preparation for Decision Making score +4.80 points (95% CI 0.53 to 9.07) vs control Annals of Internal Medicine 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39531391
Carer psychosocial / skills intervention Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for psychosocial and pharmacological interventions, which the review reports as showing mild to modest efficacy in high-quality meta-analyses. A narrative clinical review summarising other meta-analyses, not a new pooled estimate.

Caregiver burden None not stated Psychosocial interventions include support groups or psychoeducational interventions for caregivers of dementia patients (effect size, 0.09-0.23). Pharmacologic interventions include use of anticholinergics or antipsychotic medications for dementia or dementia-related behaviors in the care recipient (effect size, 0.18-0.27) JAMA 2014
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 24618967
Carer psychosocial / skills intervention Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Benefit in Hispanic and White caregivers and in Black spousal caregivers; not in Black non-spousal caregivers.

Caregiver quality of life and depression at 6 months randomised trial 642 Depression: 12.6% (intervention) vs. 22.7% (control) at 6 months Annals of Internal Medicine 2006
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 17116917
Carer psychosocial / skills intervention Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit Time to nursing home placement randomised trial 406 HR 0.717 for nursing home placement; median time to placement 557 days longer (model-predicted) in the intervention group Neurology 2006
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 17101889
Cognitive screening instrument accuracy Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Tablet tests correlated strongly with MMSE, MoCA and Trails A (r > 0.7) and the Match test separated amyloid-positive from -negative patients (AUC 0.82) better than MMSE or MoCA (0.75).

Correlation with pen-and-paper tests and discrimination of amyloid-positive from amyloid-negative early-onset AD patients cross-sectional study 475 Match and Flanker were associated with all pen‐and‐paper tests, with strongest correlations observed with the MMSE, MoCA, and Trails A (r's >0.7) ... Of TabCAT tests, Match best discriminated Aβ+ from Aβ‐ patients (Area Under the Curve (AUC)=0.82), outperforming the MMSE (AUC=0.75) and MoCA (AUC=0.75), and comparable to the overall best performing test Benson Figure Recall (AUC=0.85 Alzheimer's & Dementia (AAIC 2025 conference abstract) 2025
⚠ Conference abstract — not peer-reviewed DOI 10.1002/alz70857_104654
Cognitive screening instrument accuracy Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Pooled sensitivity 76% and specificity 83% for dementia, with 73% / 84% in primary care; the authors call it a practical screening tool while noting high or unclear risk of bias in patient selection and timing.

Pooled sensitivity and specificity of the Mini-Cog for dementia, MCI and cognitive impairment meta-analysis not stated To detect dementia (six studies, n = 4772), the Mini-Cog showed 76% sensitivity and 83% specificity. To detect MCI (two studies, n = 270), it showed 84% sensitivity and 79% specificity. To detect CI (eight studies, n = 2152), it had 67% sensitivity and 83% specificity. In the primary care setting, to detect either MCI, dementia, or CI (eight studies, n = 5620), the Mini-Cog demonstrated 73% sensitivity and 84% specificity PLOS ONE 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38483857
Cognitive screening instrument accuracy Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. The two-stage GPCOG had sensitivity 0.85 and specificity 0.86 against DSM-IV dementia, and was superior to the Abbreviated Mental Test.

Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of the GPCOG for dementia in general practice cross-sectional study 283 The two-stage method of administering the GPCOG (cognitive testing followed by informant questions if necessary)had a sensitivity of 0.85, a specificity of 0.86, a misclassification rate of 14%, and positive predictive value of 71.4% Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2002
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 11943052
Cost-effectiveness of multidomain prevention programme Care, carers and services Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for value for money: the intervention was modelled as dominant, saving JPY 452,826 per person and adding 0.08 QALYs over 35 years, with sensitivity analyses described as confirming robustness. A model extrapolating an 18-month trial.

Lifetime costs and QALYs of the J-MINT multidomain intervention versus usual care (35-year model) modelling study not stated Over 35 years, J-MINT was projected to achieve cost savings of JPY 452,826 per person and a gain of 0.08 QALYs The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41478834
Dementia care management / navigation Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

The community health worker programme achieved verified linkage to medical care in 16.7% of dyads versus none in the control arm. Caregiver outcomes were largely unchanged, with self-efficacy favouring control.

Clinic-verified linkage to medical services at 6 months (primary); caregiver psychosocial outcomes randomised trial 287 PLAN increased linkage to medical services versus control (16.7% vs 0%, chi-squared [df = 1] = 24.05, p < 0.001). Caregiver outcomes were largely unchanged, with self-efficacy favoring control Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42233272
Dementia care management / navigation Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the extended nursing role intervention: 74% fewer unmet needs and higher quality of life at six months, with a small QALY gain at about 1,425 EUR added cost; no effect on caregiver burden.

Unmet needs, quality of life, caregiver burden and cost per QALY at six months (advanced dementia care management by nurses in extended roles) randomised trial 417 PlwD receiving the intervention had 74% lower unmet needs (0.26, CI95%: 0.17 to 0.40, p < 0.001) and higher quality of life (0.04, CI95%: 0.01 to 0.07, p = 0.017) than controls. There was a gain in quality-adjusted life years (0.01, CI95%: -0.001 to 0.018) at slightly higher costs (1,425 EUR, CI95%: 638 to 2,211) Alzheimer's & Dementia 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41143334
Dementia care management / navigation Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the Care Ecosystem programme: total cost of care was $475.80 per member per month lower than matched controls at 12 months, with fewer emergency, outpatient and professional visits.

Total cost of care per member per month at 12 months versus propensity-matched controls cohort study 242 Care Ecosystem participants had significantly lower total cost of care at 12 months, mean savings of $475.80 per member per month compared with controls American Journal of Managed Care 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39146484
Dementia care management / navigation Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for collaborative dementia care management: fewer neuropsychiatric symptoms, lower caregiver burden, better mental health and 0.137 QALYs gained at no significant added cost (3186€ per QALY) over 36 months; no difference in antidementia drug use, overall quality of life or inappropriate medication.

Neuropsychiatric symptoms, caregiver burden, quality of life and cost per QALY at 36 months after 6 months of collaborative dementia care management randomised trial 428 Participants receiving CDCM showed significantly fewer behavioral and psychological symptoms (adjusted mean difference [AMD] in NPI score, -10.26 [95% CI, -16.95 to -3.58]; P = .003; Cohen d, -0.78 [95% CI, -1.09 to -0.46]) ... and lower caregiver burden (AMD in BIZA-D score, -0.59 [95% CI, -0.81 to -0.37]; P < .001; Cohen d, -0.71 [95% CI, -1.03 to -0.40]) ... The CDCM group gained QALYs (0.137 [95% CI, 0.000 to 0.274]; P = .049; Cohen d, 0.20 [95% CI, -0.09 to 0.40]) but had no significant increase in costs (437€ [-5438€ to 6313€] [US $476 (95% CI, -$5927 to $6881)]; P = .87; Cohen d, 0.07 [95% CI, -0.14 to 0.28]), resulting in a cost-effectiveness ratio of 3186€ (US $3472) per QALY JAMA Network Open 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38967926
Dementia screening / case finding Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

The outcome is how many diagnoses were made, not whether anyone was better off. The passive digital marker alone did not raise detection (AOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.63-1.11).

New dementia diagnosis within 12 months randomised trial 5,325 Adjusted OR for new dementia diagnosis 1.31 (95% CI 1.05-1.64) with QDRS plus passive digital marker vs usual care JAMA Network Open 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41212562
Health-system and payment model Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the benefit redesign: projected out-of-pocket drug spending fell 55% ($56 to $25) for low-income-subsidy beneficiaries and 25% ($772 to $576) for others, with larger reductions for people with 6-8 comorbidities.

Simulated annual out-of-pocket drug spending for Medicare beneficiaries with dementia under the 2025 Part D cost-sharing rules modelling study 1,677 we project average annual OOP drug expenditures among LIS beneficiaries with dementia to decrease from $56 to $25-representing a $31, or 55%, reduction. In contrast, among non-LIS beneficiaries, average OOP drug expenditures is projected to decrease from $772 to $576, a $196, or 25% reduction Value in Health 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39880200
Naturalistic driving behaviour (digital marker of MCI) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Driving features distinguished drivers with MCI from those with normal cognition (AUC 0.82), rising to 0.87 with demographics, APOE4 and cognition; drivers with MCI showed greater declines in trip frequency, night driving and route variety.

Discrimination of MCI from normal cognition by daily driving features, and longitudinal change in driving cohort study 298 Key features such as medium trip distance, speeding events, entropy, and maximum distance distinguished drivers with MCI from those with NC (area under the curve [AUC] 0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.89). Adding demographics, APOE ε4, and cognitive composite improved AUC to 0.87 (95% CI 0.81-0.93) Neurology 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41296993
Plasma proteomics diagnostic model (ProtAIDe-Dx) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Cross-validated balanced accuracy of 70-95% and AUC above 78% across the six conditions; the model is a development-stage tool with one external memory-clinic validation sample.

Classification accuracy for six dementia-associated conditions from plasma proteomics cross-sectional study 17,187 ProtAIDe-Dx achieves cross-validated balanced classification accuracy of 70-95% and area under the curve of >78% across all conditions Nature medicine 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41917159
Safety / firearm decision aid Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

The outcome is how prepared carers felt to decide about firearm access, not whether any injury was avoided.

Preparation for Decision Making score randomised trial 500 Preparation for Decision Making score +4.80 points (95% CI 0.53 to 9.07) vs control Annals of Internal Medicine 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39531391
Sleep intervention for carers/dyads Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for DREAMS START against treatment as usual: a 78% probability of being cost-effective at £20,000 per QALY, with cost and QALY differences individually non-significant. The clinical sleep result is in the table under its own row.

Cost per QALY gained (within-trial cost-utility) randomised trial 377 The mean incremental difference in QALYs per person with dementia was 0·016 more (95% CI 0·000 to 0·033) for the intervention group than for the TAU group, indicating no significant difference in quality of life. At a £20 000 per QALY gained decision threshold, there was a 78% probability that DREAMS START is cost-effective, compared with TAU The Lancet Healthy Longevity 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40412418

Show all 51 rows (50 shown so far)

How this table was built, and where it is weak →