Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Every row

Showing 31 of 382 rows. One row per study per exposure: a study that tested two different things appears twice, once for each.

Scroll the table sideways to see every column.

Research and outcomes, 31 rows. Every row links to its source.
Exposure Question Direction Outcome measured Design People Effect size, as the source reported it Source
Birth cohort and calendar period (secular trend in dementia) All modifiable factors together Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for more recent birth cohort: after controlling for age and period, later-born cohorts were less likely to have dementia in all three regions, more so among women; the point estimates for men in England were not significant.

Age-specific dementia prevalence by birth cohort in the US, Europe and England cross-sectional study 62,437 point estimate for 1944-1948 vs 1919-1923 cohorts: US, -0.55 [95% CI, -0.77 to -0.34] vs -0.18 [95% CI, -0.25 to -0.10]; Europe, -1.49 [95% CI, -1.72 to -1.27] vs -0.24 [95% CI, -0.35 to -0.13]; and England, -0.48 [95% CI, -0.89 to -0.08] vs -0.23 [95% CI, -0.38 to -0.07] JAMA Network Open 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40455442
Birth cohort and calendar period (secular trend in dementia) All modifiable factors together Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for the later survey year: prevalence fell from 11.6% to 8.8%, with rising education associated with some of the decline despite a worse cardiovascular risk profile.

Dementia prevalence among US adults 65+, 2000 versus 2012 cross-sectional study 21,057 Dementia prevalence among those 65 years or older decreased from 11.6% (95% CI, 10.7%-12.7%) in 2000 to 8.8% (95% CI, 8.2%-9.4%) (8.6% with age- and sex-standardization) in 2012 (P < .001) JAMA Internal Medicine 2017
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 27893041
Birth cohort and calendar period (secular trend in dementia) All modifiable factors together Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for the later-born population: prevalence was 6.5% against the 8.3% expected from the earlier study (odds ratio 0.7), which the authors read as a cohort effect.

Dementia prevalence at age 65+ in three English areas, CFAS II (2008-11) versus CFAS I (1989-94) cross-sectional study 15,431 Using CFAS I age and sex specific estimates of prevalence in individuals aged 65 years or older, standardised to the 2011 population, 8·3% (884,000) of this population would be expected to have dementia in 2011. However, CFAS II shows that the prevalence is lower (6·5%; 670,000), a decrease of 1·8% (odds ratio for CFAS II vs CFAS I 0·7, 95% CI 0·6-0·9, p=0·003) The Lancet 2013
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 23871492
Sex differences (biological sex as exposure) All modifiable factors together Prevention Harm
why

Direction is for female sex: women had higher odds of a high neuritic plaque burden than men after adjustment, and were more likely to reach Braak stage V-VI. Black non-carriers and non-carriers of African ancestry were least likely to have high plaque burden, a protection weakened in ε4 carriers.

Neuritic plaque burden (CERAD score) at autopsy by sex, and its interaction with APOE ε4, race and African ancestry cross-sectional study 2,268 Female individuals had higher plaque burden than male individuals (unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.97; 95% CI, 1.67-2.29; P < .001), and this association remained significant in adjusted models for sociodemographic and vascular factors and APOEε4 status (adjusted OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.33-2.20; P < .001). APOEε4 carriers of both sexes had an approximately 4-fold greater odds of plaques JAMA neurology 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41729539
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Stand-alone plasma p-tau217 gave 81% accuracy and 79% PPV; confirming positives with PET or CSF raised both to 91% while cutting PET scans needed to find 100 amyloid-positive people from 536 to 124. Immunoassays matched mass spectrometry on PPV but had lower accuracy.

Accuracy and positive predictive value for amyloid positivity (CSF or PET) in cognitively unimpaired people, stand-alone and in a two-step workflow cross-sectional study 2,916 As a stand-alone test, plasma p-tau217 achieved a positive predictive value (PPV) of 79% (95% CI, 74-84) and an overall accuracy of 81% (95% CI, 80-82). In a 2-step workflow, the PPV and accuracy significantly increased to 91% (95% CI, 86-95). While this approach required screening of 677 individuals with plasma p-tau217 to identify 100 Aβ-positive individuals, compared to 536 participants when using PET alone, it reduced the need for PET testing to 124 JAMA Neurology 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40952756
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. All four assays (Lumipulse, Johnson & Johnson, ALZpath, NULISA) gave statistically equivalent AUCs of 0.84-0.90 for amyloid positivity, with cross-platform correlations of 0.40-0.86.

Cross-assay agreement and AUC for amyloid PET positivity across four p-tau217 immunoassays cross-sectional study 344 All four p-tau217 assays exhibited moderate to strong cross-platform correlations (Spearman correlations of 0.40–0.86), and statistically equivalent AUCs (of 0.84–0.90) for determining Aβ positivity Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41652516
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Subgroup-specific optimal cutoffs and a double-cutoff strategy both improved accuracy over the standard single cutoff, most markedly in chronic kidney disease (0.65 to 0.83) and anaemia.

Accuracy of plasma p-tau217 for amyloid PET positivity under standard, subgroup-optimal and double cutoffs in people with kidney disease, abnormal BMI or anaemia cross-sectional study 2,571 In the UGOT cohort, the optimal cutoff improved diagnostic accuracy compared with the standard single cutoff, particularly in CKD and anemia (CKD: from 0.65; 95% CI, 0.57-0.72; to 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.89; anemia: from 0.80; 95% CI, 0.76-0.84; to 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82-0.90), with consistent findings in the Roche cohort JAMA neurology 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41627837
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Mixed
why

The findings point two ways: the p-tau217/Aβ42 ratio tracked AD-related factors (MCI, AD dementia, future progression, age, APOE ε4) more closely than either marker alone and had few intermediate results, but it was also related to kidney function, diabetes and hearing loss, and medical morbidities were most frequent among intermediate classifications.

Associations of plasma p-tau217, Aβ42/40 and p-tau217/Aβ42 with AD-related factors and with medical comorbidities (kidney function, diabetes, hearing loss) in a health-system biobank cross-sectional study 617 not established — pubmed abstract reports no numeric effect size. Annals of neurology 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41447112
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. The prespecified APS2 cut point gave 91% accuracy, 90% sensitivity and 92% specificity against amyloid PET.

Agreement with amyloid PET in an independent cohort (ADNI) cross-sectional study 191 Concordance with amyloid PET was high (AUC-ROC 0.95 (95% CI): 0.93-0.98); 54% of participants had a positive APS2. The previously validated APS2 cut point yielded an overall accuracy of 91% (95% CI: 86-94%), sensitivity 90% (95% CI: 83-94%) and specificity 92% (95% CI: 84-96%) npj Dementia 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40917102
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. AUC 0.93-0.96; accuracy 89-91% in secondary care and 85% in primary care, lower (83%) at age 80 or older; a two-cutoff approach raised accuracy to 92-94% at the cost of 12-17% intermediate results.

Diagnostic accuracy for Alzheimer pathology (CSF-defined) in secondary and primary care cross-sectional study 1,767 Plasma p-tau217 detected AD pathology with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.93-0.96. In secondary care, the accuracies were 89-91%, the positive predictive values 89-95% and the negative predictive values 77-90%. In primary care, the accuracy was 85%, the positive predictive values 82% and the negative predictive values 88%. Accuracy was lower in participants aged ≥80 years (83%) Nature Medicine 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40205199
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. The Pitt-p-tau217 assay separated PSEN1 carriers from controls (AUC 0.94) and amyloid PET-positive from -negative cognitively normal adults (AUC up to 0.84), equivalent to the ALZpath assay.

Classification accuracy of a new p-tau217 assay against PSEN1 carrier status and amyloid PET cross-sectional study 363 Pitt-p-tau217 differentiated neuropathologically confirmed PSEN1 mutation carriers from controls with area under the curve (AUC) = 0.94, and amyloid beta (Aβ) positron emission tomography (PET)-positive from Aβ PET-negative cognitively normal older adults with AUC up to 0.84, equivalent to ALZpath-p-tau217 results. Both Pitt-p-tau217 and ALZpath-p-tau217 were slightly elevated in tau PET-positive versus tau PET-negative participants. Between-assay correlations were up to 0.93 Alzheimer's & Dementia 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40665482
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. The Lumipulse plasma p-tau217/Aβ42 ratio reached AUC 0.963-0.966 for amyloid PET and 0.947-0.974 for tau PET, equivalent to CSF tests and better than plasma p-tau217 alone, with fewer intermediate results.

Diagnostic accuracy for abnormal amyloid PET and tau PET in a clinic and a community cohort cross-sectional study 512 Plasma p-tau217/Aβ42 exhibited high performance for abnormal statuses of Aβ PET (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.963 to 0.966) and tau PET (AUC: 0.947 to 0.974) ... The p-tau217/Aβ42 ratio had a lower intermediate percentage than p-tau217 alone in both clinic (10.6% vs 13.0%) and community (16.5% vs 31.4%) cohorts Alzheimer's & Dementia 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40156286
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Plasma p-tau217/Aβ42 had the highest accuracy (0.88 in Black and 0.91 in White participants) and fewest intermediate results, with no difference in classification by race.

Accuracy for amyloid PET positivity in people who self-identify as Black or White cross-sectional study 1,135 In the test set, plasma p-tau217/Aβ42 had the highest accuracy (pBlack: 0.88, pWhite: 0.91) and lowest proportion of intermediate classifications (≤0.16), with no classification difference by race (odds ratio [OR] = 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.66-2.95, p = 0.33) Alzheimer's & Dementia 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40801297
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Harm
why

Direction is for chronic kidney disease as a source of false signal: at eGFR 45 versus 60, p-tau217 was 31-55% higher in amyloid-negative people on two immunoassays, a rise largely removed by using the %p-tau217 ratio. A test-validity result, not a health outcome.

Plasma p-tau217 concentration by kidney function (eGFR) in amyloid-negative and amyloid-positive people cross-sectional study 202 For an eGFR of 45 vs 60 in the A- cohort, the calculated percentage changes were +31%, +55%, and +19%, for ALZpath p-tau217, C2N p-tau217, and C2N %p-tau217, respectively. For the A+ cohort, the corresponding calculated percentage changes were +17%, +15%, and -5%, respectively Neurology 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39823562
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Plasma p-tau217 identified symptomatic AD with 95% sensitivity and 82% specificity (86% with the Aβ42 ratio) and tracked CSF biomarkers closely (AUC 0.94-0.96); reduced kidney function raised levels in patients without AD.

Sensitivity and specificity for symptomatic AD, and agreement with CSF biomarkers, in a tertiary outpatient memory clinic cross-sectional study 509 Plasma p-tau217 distinguished patients with diagnoses of symptomatic AD with 95% sensitivity and 82% specificity. Integration of Aβ42 measurements (p-tau217/Aβ42) incrementally improved specificity (86%). Plasma p-tau217 and p-tau217/Aβ42 concentrations closely associated with established CSF biomarkers of AD (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.94 and 0.96, respectively) Alzheimer's & Dementia 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40476540
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. The APS2 blood test reached AUC 0.96-0.97 and 88-92% accuracy, and its 91% accuracy for clinical AD beat primary care physicians (61%) and dementia specialists (73%).

Diagnostic accuracy for Alzheimer pathology (CSF-defined), and for clinical AD versus physicians' assessment cross-sectional study 1,213 the AUC was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.99) when the APS2 was used, the PPV was 91% (95% CI, 87%-96%), and the NPV was 92% (95% CI, 87%-96%) [primary care, single batch]; Primary care physicians had a diagnostic accuracy of 61% (95% CI, 53%-69%) for identifying clinical AD after clinical examination, cognitive testing, and a computed tomographic scan vs 91% (95% CI, 86%-96%) using the APS2. Dementia specialists had a diagnostic accuracy of 73% (95% CI, 68%-79%) vs 91% (95% CI, 88%-95%) using the APS2 JAMA 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39068545
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. APS2 gave AUC 0.94 and 88% agreement with amyloid PET, with similar performance by ethnicity, sex, age and APOE4 status.

Agreement with amyloid PET (brain amyloidosis) cross-sectional study 583 The AUC-ROC for the PrecivityAD2 test output, the Amyloid Probability Score 2, was 0.94, yielding 88% agreement with amyloid PET Alzheimer's & Dementia 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38491912
Blood biomarkers (GFAP, NfL, p-tau217) for staging and prognosis Care, carers and services Treatment Harm
why

Direction is for microglial activation: amyloid was associated with astrocyte reactivity across cortical regions only when microglia were activated, and that microglia-dependent reactivity related to cognitive impairment through tau phosphorylation and aggregation.

Astrocyte reactivity (plasma GFAP) in relation to amyloid PET and microglial activation PET, and downstream tau and cognitive impairment cross-sectional study 352 not established — pubmed abstract reports no numeric effect size. Nature Neuroscience 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41198899
Blood biomarkers (GFAP, NfL, p-tau217) for staging and prognosis Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Plasma Aβ42/40, p-tau217, p-tau181 and NfL classified AD with AUC 83% and FTLD with 88%, consistent across countries, rising to 89% and 95% when combined with neuroimaging patterns and cognitive measures.

Discrimination of AD and frontotemporal lobar degeneration from controls by plasma AT(N) biomarkers in a multinational Latin American cohort cross-sectional study 605 Classification models achieved receiver operating characteristic areas under the curve (ROC AUCs) of 83% for AD and 88% for FTLD ... Biomarker alterations combined with disease-specific neuroimaging patterns and cognitive measures further improved accuracy (ROC AUCs of 89% for AD and 95% for FTLD) Nature Aging 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41688826
Blood biomarkers (GFAP, NfL, p-tau217) for staging and prognosis Care, carers and services Treatment Mixed
why

The result points two ways: p-tau181 gave the best AUC for separating AD from controls, frontotemporal dementia and amyloid-negative Lewy body dementia, but that discrimination could not be reproduced when pre-defined cut-offs were applied, so cohort-specific cut-offs were needed.

Discrimination of AD from controls, frontotemporal dementia and Lewy body dementia by plasma Aβ42/40, p-tau181, GFAP and NfL, and transfer of predefined cut-offs to validation cohorts cross-sectional study 1,298 not established — pubmed abstract results prints no auc or other figure; it states only that p-tau181 showed the best area under the curve and that pre-defined… Alzheimer's & Dementia 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40551285
CSF alpha-synuclein seed amplification assay Care, carers and services Treatment Mixed
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Results ranged from 55% to 100% sensitivity and 60% to 100% specificity across four laboratories using different protocols, with only fair agreement between them (kappa 0.246).

Sensitivity, specificity and cross-laboratory agreement for dementia with Lewy bodies cross-sectional study 30 On average, the 4 laboratories achieved 78.8% sensitivity (minimum 55%, maximum 100%), 77.5% specificity (minimum 60%, maximum 100%), and 78.5% accuracy (minimum 57%, maximum 100%) for discriminating DLB from controls ... A fair agreement of SAA results was obtained across the 4 laboratories (average κ = 0.246) Neurology 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41604609
Cognitive screening instrument accuracy Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Tablet tests correlated strongly with MMSE, MoCA and Trails A (r > 0.7) and the Match test separated amyloid-positive from -negative patients (AUC 0.82) better than MMSE or MoCA (0.75).

Correlation with pen-and-paper tests and discrimination of amyloid-positive from amyloid-negative early-onset AD patients cross-sectional study 475 Match and Flanker were associated with all pen‐and‐paper tests, with strongest correlations observed with the MMSE, MoCA, and Trails A (r's >0.7) ... Of TabCAT tests, Match best discriminated Aβ+ from Aβ‐ patients (Area Under the Curve (AUC)=0.82), outperforming the MMSE (AUC=0.75) and MoCA (AUC=0.75), and comparable to the overall best performing test Benson Figure Recall (AUC=0.85 Alzheimer's & Dementia (AAIC 2025 conference abstract) 2025
⚠ Conference abstract — not peer-reviewed DOI 10.1002/alz70857_104654
Cognitive screening instrument accuracy Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. The two-stage GPCOG had sensitivity 0.85 and specificity 0.86 against DSM-IV dementia, and was superior to the Abbreviated Mental Test.

Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of the GPCOG for dementia in general practice cross-sectional study 283 The two-stage method of administering the GPCOG (cognitive testing followed by informant questions if necessary)had a sensitivity of 0.85, a specificity of 0.86, a misclassification rate of 14%, and positive predictive value of 71.4% Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2002
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 11943052
Cost of dementia care Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

A descriptive spending analysis with no exposure compared, so there is no direction to record: Part D spending rose with dual-eligibility duration, Part B drug spending varied widely by state, and ACO enrollment made only a modest difference.

Medicare Part D and Part B drug spending and out-of-pocket costs among fee-for-service beneficiaries with dementia, by dual eligibility, state and ACO enrollment cross-sectional study 1,372,696 Medicare Part D drug spending was substantial, increasing with dual-eligibility duration: $8732-$9107 among beneficiaries with full-year dual eligibility and exceeding $11 500 among those with 5+ chronic conditions ... Medicare Part B drug spending was highest among Medicare-only beneficiaries and varied widely by state, ranging from $433 to $1827 among Medicare-only beneficiaries and from $179 to $1446 among dually eligible beneficiaries Innovation in Aging 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42787606
Cost of dementia care Care, carers and services Treatment Harm
why

Direction is for being on the Alzheimer's continuum: societal costs were 52% higher in subjective cognitive decline, 170% in MCI and 307% in AD dementia than in controls, and payer costs 26%, 85% and 36% higher. A cost result, not a health outcome.

Excess annual costs from payer and societal perspectives in subjective cognitive decline, MCI and AD dementia versus controls cross-sectional study not stated From a payer perspective, costs were elevated by 26% for SCD (adjusted mean 5,976€ [95%CI 4,598-7,355€]), 85% for MCI (8,795€ [6,200-11,391€]) and 36% for AD (6,454€ [2,796-10,111€]) compared to controls (4,754€ [3,586-5,922€]). Societal costs were elevated by 52% for SCD (adjusted mean 8,377€ [95%CI 6,009-10,746€]), 170% for MCI (14,886€ [9,524-20,248€]) and 307% for AD (22,481€ [9,994-34,969€]) compared to controls (5,522€ [3,814-7,230€]) Alzheimer's research & therapy 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40571933
Cost of dementia care Care, carers and services Treatment Harm
why

Direction is for living in the community rather than a nursing home: unadjusted costs were lower in the community, but after adjusting for functional impairment and comorbidity community care cost €11,344 more per year, mainly through informal care. A cost result, not a health outcome.

Annual societal cost of care, community-dwelling versus nursing home residents cross-sectional study 176 Unadjusted mean annual total costs including informal care were €29,930 ($43,997) for community-dwelling patients and €33,482 ($49,218) for patients living in nursing homes. However, multiple regression analysis controlling for age, sex, deficits in basic and instrumental activities of daily living and comorbidity showed that living in the community significantly increased total costs by €11,344 ($16,676; P < .01) compared with living in a nursing home, mainly due to higher costs of informal care (+€20,585; +$30,260; P < .001) Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 2014
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 24321877
Palliative / advance care planning Care, carers and services Treatment No direction reported
why

A Delphi consensus among 60 international expert panellists, reaching agreement on 15 major and 42 minor referral criteria. No patient outcome is measured and no effect is estimated.

Consensus referral criteria for specialist palliative care (no patient outcome) cross-sectional study 60 not established — delphi survey; the abstract reports consensus counts (15 major, 42 minor criteria), not an effect estimate. JAMA Network Open 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40366652
Plasma proteomics diagnostic model (ProtAIDe-Dx) Care, carers and services Treatment Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Cross-validated balanced accuracy of 70-95% and AUC above 78% across the six conditions; the model is a development-stage tool with one external memory-clinic validation sample.

Classification accuracy for six dementia-associated conditions from plasma proteomics cross-sectional study 17,187 ProtAIDe-Dx achieves cross-validated balanced classification accuracy of 70-95% and area under the curve of >78% across all conditions Nature medicine 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41917159
Tau PET imaging (natural history of tau) Care, carers and services Treatment Harm
why

Direction is for regional tau burden: more tau went with less glucose metabolism (r = -0.49) and with worse domain-specific cognition, while amyloid was diffuse and only weakly related. An imaging association, not an exposure effect.

Regional glucose hypometabolism and domain-specific cognitive deficits cross-sectional study 35 there was a strong negative association between (18)F-AV1451 and (18)F-FDG uptake (Pearson's r = -0.49 ± 0.07, P < 0.001) and less pronounced positive associations between (11)C-PiB and (18)F-FDG (Pearson's r = 0.16 ± 0.09, P < 0.001) and (18)F-AV1451 and (11)C-PiB (Pearson's r = 0.18 ± 0.09, P < 0.001) Brain 2016
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 26962052
APOE genotype Genes (not modifiable) Prevention No direction reported
why

A descriptive proteomic mapping: APOE-linked protein changes were present before amyloid pathology and stable across age and disease stage, with ε2 tied to cellular-maintenance and anti-inflammatory pathways and ε4 to cell-cycle, oligodendrocyte-precursor and downstream vascular, immune and proteostatic proteins. It estimates no effect on a clinical outcome.

Plasma and CSF proteomic signatures of APOE ε4 and ε2 across five cohorts cross-sectional study not stated not established — pubmed abstract reports no numeric effect size. Nature Aging 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42141098
Polygenic risk / GWAS loci Genes (not modifiable) Prevention No direction reported
why

A transcriptome-wide association study prioritising nine genes (including BIN1, PTK2B and DMPK) with broadly consistent effects across populations; it reports no effect estimate for any exposure, so no direction is recorded.

Genes whose blood expression is genetically associated with Alzheimer's disease across three populations cross-sectional study 751 not established — pubmed abstract reports gene counts and a correlation (r2 ≈ 0.34 between two bin1 variants), no effect estimate. American Journal of Human Genetics 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42066773

How this table was built, and where it is weak →