Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Every row

Showing 15 of 382 rows. One row per study per exposure: a study that tested two different things appears twice, once for each.

Scroll the table sideways to see every column.

Research and outcomes, 15 rows. Every row links to its source.
Exposure Question Direction Outcome measured Design People Effect size, as the source reported it Source
Birth cohort and calendar period (secular trend in dementia) All modifiable factors together Prevention Mixed
why

The two measures moved in opposite directions over 2015-2021: standardised incidence fell from 3.5% to 2.8% per year while prevalence rose from 10.5% to 11.8%; gaps between Black or Hispanic and White beneficiaries narrowed.

Age- and sex-standardised incidence and prevalence of diagnosed dementia among US Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries, 2015-2021 cohort study not stated The overall age and sex standardized incidence decreased between 2015 and 2021 from 3.5% to 2.8%. Prevalence increased during this time from 10.5% to 11.8% BMJ 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40393738
Birth cohort and calendar period (secular trend in dementia) All modifiable factors together Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for later birth cohort: each successive cohort had a significantly lower incident dementia rate, independent of sex, education and age.

Incident dementia rate by decade of birth (1902-1941) cohort study 3,010 Compared to the earliest birth cohort (1902-1911), each subsequent cohort had a significantly lower incident dementia rate (1912-1921: incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.655, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.477-0.899; 1922-1931: IRR = 0.387, 95% CI = 0.265-0.564; 1932-1941: IRR = 0.233, 95% CI = 0.121-0.449) The Journals of Gerontology: Series A (Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences) 2019
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 30312371
Birth cohort and calendar period (secular trend in dementia) All modifiable factors together Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for later calendar epoch: incidence fell 44% from the first to the fourth epoch, but only among people with at least a high school diploma. The authors could not fully explain the decline.

5-year incidence of dementia across four epochs (late 1970s to early 2010s) cohort study 5,205 The 5-year age- and sex-adjusted cumulative hazard rates for dementia were 3.6 per 100 persons during the first epoch (late 1970s and early 1980s), 2.8 per 100 persons during the second epoch (late 1980s and early 1990s), 2.2 per 100 persons during the third epoch (late 1990s and early 2000s), and 2.0 per 100 persons during the fourth epoch (late 2000s and early 2010s). Relative to the incidence during the first epoch, the incidence declined by 22%, 38%, and 44% during the second, third, and fourth epochs, respectively. This risk reduction was observed only among persons who had at least a high school diploma (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.67 to 0.88) New England Journal of Medicine 2016
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 26863354
Birth cohort and calendar period (secular trend in dementia) All modifiable factors together Prevention No effect
why

Incidence was consistently but non-significantly lower in the 2000 subcohort (rate ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.56-1.02, borderline). The authors read the pattern, together with lower mortality and larger brain volumes, as suggesting a decline, but the primary comparison did not reach significance.

Age-adjusted dementia incidence, 2000 subcohort versus 1990 subcohort cohort study 7,496 Age-adjusted dementia incidence rates were consistently, yet nonsignificantly, lower in the 2000 subcohort in all strata, reaching borderline significance in the overall analysis (incidence rate ratio 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-1.02). Mortality rates were also lower in the 2000 subcohort (rate ratio 0.63, 95% CI 0.52-0.77) Neurology 2012
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 22551732
Mixed neuropathology at autopsy (LATE-NC, Lewy, vascular, ADNC) All modifiable factors together Prevention Harm
why

Direction is for degenerative pathology profiles: more than 80% had mixed pathologies, and of five clustered profiles the LATE-NC/hippocampal sclerosis and the ADNC/amyloid angiopathy profiles showed the fastest cognitive decline.

Latent neuropathologic profiles at autopsy and their associated cognitive trajectories over up to 30 years cohort study 1,633 not established — pubmed abstract results gives profile sizes but no numeric estimate of the differences in cognitive decline. JAMA Network Open 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41543852
Mixed neuropathology at autopsy (LATE-NC, Lewy, vascular, ADNC) All modifiable factors together Prevention Harm
why

Direction is for LATE-NC: found in 64% of brains, stages 1a, 2 and 3 were associated with dementia and lower MMSE, it was among the strongest independent predictors of dementia, and its attributable risk (24.2%) exceeded that of Alzheimer's neuropathologic change (18.6%); it usually occurred alongside other pathologies.

Frequency of LATE-NC at autopsy in people aged 85+, and its association with dementia and MMSE alongside other pathologies cohort study 295 LATE-NC was found in 189 of 295 subjects (64.1%) ... When LATE-NC and ADNC were assessed in a multivariate model without other dementia-associated pathologies, the attributable risk was higher for LATE-NC than ADNC (24.2% versus 18.6%) Brain 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38938199
Modifiable risk factors combined All modifiable factors together Prevention Harm
why

Direction is for carrying the risk factors. The Danish estimate (37.8% across 16 factors) is lower than the Lancet Commission's global 45%.

Population attributable fraction of dementia cohort study 1,753,515 Overall population attributable fraction 37.8% (95% CI 35.6-40.0); infections 9.4%, depression 8.7%, CVD 7.6% The Lancet Public Health 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42425116
Modifiable risk factors combined All modifiable factors together Prevention Harm
why

Direction is for carrying the risk factors: depression, diabetes, low education, smoking, obesity, physical inactivity and alcohol overconsumption each independently raised the hazard of early-onset dementia, and most associations were stronger for early-onset than late-onset dementia.

Incident early-onset dementia (before 65) and late-onset dementia over a median 13.7 years cohort study 544,442 Black versus White race (1·61 [1·23-2·11]), grade school education or less (1·99 [1·67-2·38]), diabetes (2·45 [1·99-3·03]), depression (2·73 [2·34-3·20]), smoking (1·86 [1·56-2·22]), obesity (1·24 [1·04-1·48]), physical inactivity (1·33 [1·11-1·59]), and alcohol overconsumption (1·22 [1·01-1·47]) were independently associated with higher hazards of early-onset dementia The lancet. Healthy longevity 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41936382
Modifiable risk factors combined All modifiable factors together Prevention Harm
why

Direction is for carrying the risk factors. Which factor mattered most differed by APOE risk group, on 2,065 cases split across 11 factors and three genetic strata, so the subgroup estimates are imprecise.

Incident all-cause dementia over 12.4 years cohort study 182,473 Low social contact HR 3.86 (95% CI 2.08-7.17) in low APOE risk group; less education PAF 11.35% in high APOE risk group Annals of Neurology 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41085200
Modifiable risk factors combined All modifiable factors together Prevention Harm
why

Direction is for carrying hypertension, diabetes or smoking. The attributable share rose with the age at which the factors were measured (22% at 45-54, 44% at 65-74), which is what you would expect if some of it is reverse causation rather than cause.

Population attributable fraction of dementia by age 80 cohort study 12,274 22-44% of dementia by age 80 attributable to hypertension, diabetes or smoking JAMA Neurology 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40455489
Modifiable risk factors combined All modifiable factors together Prevention Harm
why

Direction is for carrying the risk factors. 39 candidate factors were screened against 485 cases, so individual estimates are imprecise.

Incident young-onset dementia cohort study 356,052 485 incident young-onset dementia cases (16.8 per 100,000 person-years) among 356,052 participants; 39 candidate risk factors tested, most of the associated factors modifiable JAMA Neurology 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38147328
Modifiable risk factors combined All modifiable factors together Prevention Harm
why

For the vascular risk factors: up to a quarter of the education-dementia association ran through hypertension, diabetes and related midlife factors, so carrying them accounted for part of the excess risk.

Incident dementia cohort study 13,368 8-44% lower dementia risk with higher education vs grade school; up to 25% mediated by midlife vascular risk factors Annals of Neurology 2023
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 36966451
Population burden (prevalence, incidence, lifetime risk) All modifiable factors together Prevention No direction reported
why

A lifetime-risk estimate (42% after age 55, higher in women, Black adults and APOE4 carriers) and a projection of new cases. It compares no exposure, so no direction is recorded.

Lifetime risk of dementia from age 55, and projected annual US incident cases to 2060 cohort study 15,043 The lifetime risk of dementia after age 55 years was 42% (95% confidence interval: 41-43). Rates were substantially higher in women, Black adults and APOE ε4 carriers, with lifetime risks ranging from approximately 45% to 60% in these populations. The number of US adults who will develop dementia each year was projected to increase from approximately 514,000 in 2020 to approximately 1 million in 2060 Nature Medicine 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39806070
Race and ethnicity (population comparison) All modifiable factors together Prevention Harm
why

Direction is for being African-American or American Indian/Alaska Native relative to Asian-American members: incidence was highest in those groups (26.6 and 22.2 per 1000 person-years) and lowest in Asian-Americans (15.2). The authors present this as a benchmark for reducing disparities, not as a biological effect of race.

Dementia incidence 2000-2013 and 25-year cumulative risk at age 65 cohort study 274,283 Dementia incidence (n = 59,555) was highest for African-Americans (26.6/1000 person-years) and AIANs (22.2/1000 person-years); intermediate for Latinos (19.6/1000 person-years), Pacific Islanders (19.6/1000 person-years), and whites (19.3/1000 person-years) and lowest among Asian-Americans (15.2/1000 person-years). Risk was 65% greater for African-Americans (hazard ratio = 1.65; 95% confidence interval = 1.58-1.72) versus Asian-Americans Alzheimer's & Dementia 2016
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 26874595
Sex differences (biological sex as exposure) All modifiable factors together Prevention Harm
why

Direction is for female sex: at higher amyloid levels women had higher plasma p-tau217 than men, greater tau deposition and accumulation at a given p-tau217 level, and faster cognitive decline in two of the cohorts.

Plasma p-tau217 by sex and amyloid load; tau PET accumulation and cognitive decline cohort study 1,292 Compared with men, women had significantly higher baseline p-tau217 levels at higher aggregated Aβ Centiloid levels (β, -0.21 [95% CI, -0.37 to -0.05], P = .009; highest interaction was found in the Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer's Disease/Longitudinal Evaluation of Amyloid Risk and Neurodegeneration [A4/LEARN] cohort) JAMA neurology 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41697669

How this table was built, and where it is weak →