Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Every row

Showing 1 of 382 rows. One row per study per exposure: a study that tested two different things appears twice, once for each.

Scroll the table sideways to see every column.

Research and outcomes, 1 row. Every row links to its source.
Exposure Question Direction Outcome measured Design People Effect size, as the source reported it Source
Polygenic risk / GWAS loci Genes (not modifiable) Prevention Mixed
why

The intervention-control cognitive difference was statistically significant in the higher-genetic-risk halves and not in the lower halves, but neither genetic score significantly modified the intervention effect overall (P > 0.46); an exploratory sex difference emerged for the Alzheimer score.

Annual change in overall cognition (modified NTB) with a 2-year multidomain lifestyle intervention, by Alzheimer and coronary genetic risk score randomised trial 1,177 The intervention-control difference in annual overall cognition change (95% confidence interval) for participants with AD-GRS above/below the median (i.e. higher/lower risk) was 0.032 (0.002-0.063) versus 0.017 (-0.011 to 0.045), and for CAD-GRS above/below the median was 0.031 (0.002 to 0.059) versus 0.016 (-0.012 to 0.044). AD-GRS or CAD-GRS were not significantly related to the intervention effect overall (P > 0.46), but for AD-GRS there were differences between females and males (P = 0.024) Brain : a journal of neurology 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40747850

How this table was built, and where it is weak →