Home › Research › What the research found › Every row
Every row of the evidence table
One row per finding: what was tested, which way the result went, and how the study was built. The answer by area, and where the studies disagree, are on the main page.
Every row
Filter
Showing 4 of 382 rows for Health-system and payment model. One row per study per exposure: a study that tested two different things appears twice, once for each.
Scroll the table sideways to see every column.
| Exposure | Question | Direction | Outcome measured | Design | People | Effect size, as the source reported it | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health-system and payment model Care, carers and services | Treatment |
No effect
whyDifference-in-differences around ACO entry found no change in end-of-life care processes, outcomes or spending. |
Hospice use and end-of-life spending | cohort study | 162,034 | Hospice use difference -0.4 percentage points (95% CI -1.4 to 0.5); last-6-months spending -$632 (95% CI -$1,377 to $113) |
JAMA Health Forum
2025 ✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40343716 |
| Health-system and payment model Care, carers and services | Treatment |
No direction reported
whyA single-programme implementation report with no comparison group. It counts enrolment and service use and estimates no effect. |
Enrolment, respite use and disenrolment in the first year of one GUIDE programme | cohort study | 158 | Over 35% of eligible beneficiaries have utilized respite services. Approximately 9% have disenrolled, the majority (64%) expired/hospice |
Innovation in Aging (GSA 2025 conference abstract)
2025 ⚠ Conference abstract — not peer-reviewed DOI 10.1093/geroni/igaf122.3561 |
| Health-system and payment model Care, carers and services | Treatment |
No direction reported
whyImplementation guidance drawn from six earlier comprehensive dementia care programmes. It reports no effect estimate of its own. |
None measured (implementation guidance) | None | not stated | not established — guidance article; the abstract reports no data. the library's "up to 20% of emergency department visits ... avoidable" is a cited statistic not in… |
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
2025 ✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41170936 |
| Health-system and payment model Care, carers and services | Treatment |
Benefit
whyDirection is for the benefit redesign: projected out-of-pocket drug spending fell 55% ($56 to $25) for low-income-subsidy beneficiaries and 25% ($772 to $576) for others, with larger reductions for people with 6-8 comorbidities. |
Simulated annual out-of-pocket drug spending for Medicare beneficiaries with dementia under the 2025 Part D cost-sharing rules | modelling study | 1,677 | we project average annual OOP drug expenditures among LIS beneficiaries with dementia to decrease from $56 to $25-representing a $31, or 55%, reduction. In contrast, among non-LIS beneficiaries, average OOP drug expenditures is projected to decrease from $772 to $576, a $196, or 25% reduction |
Value in Health
2025 ✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39880200 |