Home › Research › What the research found › Every row
Every row of the evidence table
One row per finding: what was tested, which way the result went, and how the study was built. The answer by area, and where the studies disagree, are on the main page.
Every row
Filter
Showing 9 of 382 rows. One row per study per exposure: a study that tested two different things appears twice, once for each.
Scroll the table sideways to see every column.
| Exposure | Question | Direction | Outcome measured | Design | People | Effect size, as the source reported it | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-amyloid antibody Medicines | Treatment |
Benefit
whyPhase Ib/IIa biomarker result in 13 people; no cognitive outcome measured. |
Amyloid PET and CSF biomarkers (surrogate) | phase 2 trial | 13 | 3.6 mg/kg cohort: "-89 centiloids after 12 weeks (n=13), and -107 centiloids after 28 weeks (n=12)" on amyloid PET; at week 25 CSF "total tau, phosphorylated tau181, and neurogranin were reduced by 30%, 34%, and 29%, respectively" |
Alzheimer's & Dementia (AAIC 2025 conference abstract)
2025 ⚠ Conference abstract — not peer-reviewed PMC12740797 |
| Anti-tau therapy Medicines | Treatment |
No effect
whyThe primary endpoint was not met: the low dose showed no clinically meaningful benefit and the 3 mg dose showed 32% greater progression than placebo, with more serious adverse events. Less whole-brain volume loss on MRI is a surrogate finding. |
iADRS disease-progression ratio at 100 weeks (primary); tau PET, brain volume, adverse events | phase 2 trial | 327 | The disease progression ratio relative to placebo was 0.84 (95% credible interval [CrI], 0.66-1.04) for the ceperognastat 0.75 mg group and 1.32 (CrI, 1.10-1.58) for the ceperognastat 3 mg group, corresponding to 16% less and 32% greater progression, respectively. No benefits were demonstrated for secondary clinical end points |
JAMA
2026 ✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42441396 |
| Anti-tau therapy Medicines | Treatment |
No effect
whyThe primary clinical endpoint (CDR-SB) was not met in the overall population. The tau figures are a biomarker outcome, not a clinical one. |
CDR-SB (primary); tau PET accumulation | phase 2 trial | 466 | "Slowed the rate of tau accumulation versus placebo in key brain regions by 33%-58%" overall and "by 63%-67%" in the low-tau or APOE4 non-carrier subgroup; "In the overall study population, no beneficial effect of low- or high-dose bepranemab compared with placebo was observed on the primary endpoint"; ADAS-Cog14 decline slowed 21-25% |
UCB press release (data presented at CTAD 2024)
2024 ⚠ Press release — not a study no DOI or PMID exists |
| Anti-tau therapy Medicines | Treatment |
No effect
whyADAS-Cog11 showed slower decline, but the co-primary functional endpoint (ADCS-ADL) did not differ and the authors classify the study as negative. |
ADCS-ADL and ADAS-Cog11 (co-primary) at week 49 | phase 2 trial | 272 | "At week 49, the semorinemab arm demonstrated a 42.2% reduction (-2.89 points, 95% CI -4.56 to -1.21, p = 0.0008) in decline on the ADAS-Cog11 (coprimary endpoint) relative to the placebo arm"; ADCS-ADL difference -0.83 points (95% CI -3.39 to 1.72, p = 0.52), with no difference on MMSE or CDR-SB |
Neurology
2023 ✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 37643887 |
| Antiviral (valacyclovir) for HSV-seropositive Alzheimer's Medicines | Treatment |
Harm
whyDirection is for valacyclovir: cognition worsened more on the drug than on placebo on the primary outcome (between-group difference 3.93 ADAS-Cog points, P = .01); function, amyloid PET and tau PET did not differ. The authors conclude it is not recommended. |
ADAS-Cog change at 78 weeks (primary); ADCS-ADL, amyloid PET and tau PET | phase 2 trial | 120 | At 78 weeks, the LSM change in the 11-item ADAS-Cognitive Subscale score was 10.86 (95% CI, 8.80 to 12.91) in the valacyclovir group vs 6.92 (95% CI, 4.88 to 8.97) in the placebo group, indicating greater cognitive worsening with valacyclovir than placebo (between-group difference, 3.93 [95% CI, 1.03 to 6.83]; P = .01). The LSM change in the ADCS-ADL Scale score at 78 weeks was -13.78 (95% CI, -17.00 to -10.56) in the valacyclovir group vs -10.16 (95% CI, -13.37 to -6.96) in the placebo group (between-group difference, -3.62 [95% CI, -8.16 to 0.93]) |
JAMA
2026 ✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41405855 |
| GLP-1 receptor agonist Medicines | Treatment |
No effect
whyPrimary outcome null. One secondary cognitive measure (ADAS-Exec) favoured liraglutide on an unadjusted test; ADCS-ADL and CDR-SB did not. |
Cerebral glucose metabolic rate at 52 weeks (primary) | phase 2 trial | 204 | Cerebral glucose metabolism difference -0.17 (95% CI -0.39 to 0.06, p=0.14); CDR-SB -0.06 (95% CI -0.57 to 0.44) |
Nature Medicine
2026 ✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41326666 |
| Other investigational drug Medicines | Treatment |
No effect
whyThe trial did not meet its primary endpoint at any of three doses despite sustained target engagement (lower CSF soluble TREM2, higher osteopontin); the most frequent adverse events were MRI changes resembling ARIA. |
Change from baseline in CDR-SB at week 96 versus placebo (primary endpoint) with the TREM2 agonist antibody AL002 | phase 2 trial | 381 | least squares mean difference versus placebo (95% confidence interval) at week 96: 15 mg kg-1 -0.31 (-1.61 to 0.98), 40 mg kg-1 0.13 (-1.18 to 1.43) and 60 mg kg-1 -0.17 (-1.49 to 1.15); P > 0.05 from mixed-effects model for repeated measures |
Nature Medicine
2026 ✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41787076 |
| Psychotropics for agitation / psychosis Medicines | Treatment |
Benefit
whyThe NPI-C agitation/aggression measure did not reach significance (p=0.094). |
Pittsburgh Agitation Scale over 3 weeks | phase 2 trial | 75 | PAS decline difference -0.74/week (p=0.015, ES 0.53); NPI-C A/A -1.26/week (p=0.094, ES 0.36) |
The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
2026 ✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41350162 |
| Psychotropics for agitation / psychosis Medicines | Treatment |
Benefit
whyThe authors describe the reduction as small (-1.32 points). |
NPI apathy score at 6 weeks | phase 2 trial | 94 | NPI apathy change -1.32 points (95% CI -2.43 to -0.21) vs placebo |
The Lancet Neurology
2025 ✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39862881 |