Home › Research › What the research found › Every row
Every row of the evidence table
One row per finding: what was tested, which way the result went, and how the study was built. The answer by area, and where the studies disagree, are on the main page.
Every row
Filter
Showing 5 of 382 rows for Metformin / antidiabetic. One row per study per exposure: a study that tested two different things appears twice, once for each.
Scroll the table sideways to see every column.
| Exposure | Question | Direction | Outcome measured | Design | People | Effect size, as the source reported it | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metformin / antidiabetic Medicines | Prevention |
Benefit
whyHeterogeneity was near-total (I-squared 98.9%) and the estimate went to null in people newly diagnosed with diabetes (HR 1.01), which is where prevalent-user bias would be smallest. |
Incident dementia | meta-analysis | 3,463,100 | HR 0.76 (95% CI 0.65-0.91) vs non-users overall; HR 1.01 (0.81-1.27) in newly diagnosed diabetes |
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
2025 ✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39780315 |
| Metformin / antidiabetic Medicines | Prevention |
No effect
whyDesigned around new diabetes diagnoses with a landmark analysis and a one-year lag, which removes the prevalent-user advantage that inflates metformin's apparent benefit in the pooled cohorts. |
Incident dementia | cohort study | 34,700 | Adjusted HR 1.05 (95% CI 0.96-1.15), no association |
Journal of Internal Medicine
2024 ✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 37747779 |
| Metformin / antidiabetic Medicines | Prevention |
Benefit
whyComparator is other oral antidiabetic drugs, not no treatment. |
All-cause dementia and Parkinson's disease | cohort study | 358,862 | All-cause dementia aHR 0.79 (95% CI 0.69-0.90) for SGLT2 inhibitor vs other oral antidiabetic drugs |
Neurology
2024 ✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39292986 |
| Metformin / antidiabetic Medicines | Prevention |
Mixed
whyThe split inside this one paper is the finding: the 41 observational studies show large benefits (SGLT2i OR 0.56, GLP-1RA OR 0.58) while the 23 randomised trials show no difference. When design and result disagree this cleanly, the trials are the ones to believe. |
Incident dementia | meta-analysis | 3,462,926 | Observational: SGLT2i OR 0.56 (95% CI 0.45-0.69), GLP-1RA OR 0.58 (0.46-0.73) vs non-users; RCTs: no difference |
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
2024 ✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39716328 |
| Metformin / antidiabetic Medicines | Prevention |
Benefit
whyThe exposure actually studied is STOPPING metformin early, which carried 21% higher dementia incidence than staying on it. Read as indirect support for metformin, not as a trial of it. |
Incident dementia | cohort study | 41,346 | HR 1.21 (95% CI 1.12-1.30) for dementia after early metformin termination |
JAMA Network Open
2023 ✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 37878309 |