Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Every row

Showing 64 of 382 rows. One row per study per exposure: a study that tested two different things appears twice, once for each.

Scroll the table sideways to see every column.

Research and outcomes, 64 rows. Every row links to its source.
Exposure Question Direction Outcome measured Design People Effect size, as the source reported it Source
Alcohol Alcohol, tobacco and cannabis Prevention Benefit
why

This one reports light-to-moderate drinking as protective (HR 0.65) against non-drinking, and it flatly contradicts the Mendelian randomisation evidence. Infrequent drinkers were excluded, and non-drinkers include people who stopped for health reasons.

Incident dementia over a median 13.7 years cohort study 296,715 Low-moderate drinking HR 0.65 (95% CI 0.59-0.73) vs non-drinking European Journal of Epidemiology 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41014391
Smoking Alcohol, tobacco and cannabis Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for QUITTING. Risk approached that of never-smokers and levelled off about seven years after quitting; weight gain after quitting narrowed the advantage. The authors flag residual confounding.

Incident dementia over a median 9.9 years cohort study 32,802 HR 0.84 (95% CI 0.73-0.95) for quitting during follow-up vs continuing to smoke Neurology 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42160746
Birth cohort and calendar period (secular trend in dementia) All modifiable factors together Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for more recent birth cohort: after controlling for age and period, later-born cohorts were less likely to have dementia in all three regions, more so among women; the point estimates for men in England were not significant.

Age-specific dementia prevalence by birth cohort in the US, Europe and England cross-sectional study 62,437 point estimate for 1944-1948 vs 1919-1923 cohorts: US, -0.55 [95% CI, -0.77 to -0.34] vs -0.18 [95% CI, -0.25 to -0.10]; Europe, -1.49 [95% CI, -1.72 to -1.27] vs -0.24 [95% CI, -0.35 to -0.13]; and England, -0.48 [95% CI, -0.89 to -0.08] vs -0.23 [95% CI, -0.38 to -0.07] JAMA Network Open 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40455442
Birth cohort and calendar period (secular trend in dementia) All modifiable factors together Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for later birth cohort: each successive cohort had a significantly lower incident dementia rate, independent of sex, education and age.

Incident dementia rate by decade of birth (1902-1941) cohort study 3,010 Compared to the earliest birth cohort (1902-1911), each subsequent cohort had a significantly lower incident dementia rate (1912-1921: incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.655, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.477-0.899; 1922-1931: IRR = 0.387, 95% CI = 0.265-0.564; 1932-1941: IRR = 0.233, 95% CI = 0.121-0.449) The Journals of Gerontology: Series A (Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences) 2019
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 30312371
Birth cohort and calendar period (secular trend in dementia) All modifiable factors together Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for the later survey year: prevalence fell from 11.6% to 8.8%, with rising education associated with some of the decline despite a worse cardiovascular risk profile.

Dementia prevalence among US adults 65+, 2000 versus 2012 cross-sectional study 21,057 Dementia prevalence among those 65 years or older decreased from 11.6% (95% CI, 10.7%-12.7%) in 2000 to 8.8% (95% CI, 8.2%-9.4%) (8.6% with age- and sex-standardization) in 2012 (P < .001) JAMA Internal Medicine 2017
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 27893041
Birth cohort and calendar period (secular trend in dementia) All modifiable factors together Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for later calendar epoch: incidence fell 44% from the first to the fourth epoch, but only among people with at least a high school diploma. The authors could not fully explain the decline.

5-year incidence of dementia across four epochs (late 1970s to early 2010s) cohort study 5,205 The 5-year age- and sex-adjusted cumulative hazard rates for dementia were 3.6 per 100 persons during the first epoch (late 1970s and early 1980s), 2.8 per 100 persons during the second epoch (late 1980s and early 1990s), 2.2 per 100 persons during the third epoch (late 1990s and early 2000s), and 2.0 per 100 persons during the fourth epoch (late 2000s and early 2010s). Relative to the incidence during the first epoch, the incidence declined by 22%, 38%, and 44% during the second, third, and fourth epochs, respectively. This risk reduction was observed only among persons who had at least a high school diploma (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.67 to 0.88) New England Journal of Medicine 2016
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 26863354
Birth cohort and calendar period (secular trend in dementia) All modifiable factors together Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for the later-born population: prevalence was 6.5% against the 8.3% expected from the earlier study (odds ratio 0.7), which the authors read as a cohort effect.

Dementia prevalence at age 65+ in three English areas, CFAS II (2008-11) versus CFAS I (1989-94) cross-sectional study 15,431 Using CFAS I age and sex specific estimates of prevalence in individuals aged 65 years or older, standardised to the 2011 population, 8·3% (884,000) of this population would be expected to have dementia in 2011. However, CFAS II shows that the prevalence is lower (6·5%; 670,000), a decrease of 1·8% (odds ratio for CFAS II vs CFAS I 0·7, 95% CI 0·6-0·9, p=0·003) The Lancet 2013
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 23871492
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. The estimated age at plasma %p-tau217 positivity predicted age at symptom onset (adjusted R2 0.337-0.612) with a median absolute error of 3.0-3.7 years, which the authors call acceptable for trials but not yet for individual clinical use.

Predicted age at onset of Alzheimer's symptoms from plasma %p-tau217 clock models cohort study 603 The estimated age at plasma %p-tau217 positivity was associated with the age at onset of AD symptoms (adjusted R2 of 0.337-0.612) with a median absolute error of 3.0-3.7 years Nature medicine 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41714746
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Stand-alone plasma p-tau217 gave 81% accuracy and 79% PPV; confirming positives with PET or CSF raised both to 91% while cutting PET scans needed to find 100 amyloid-positive people from 536 to 124. Immunoassays matched mass spectrometry on PPV but had lower accuracy.

Accuracy and positive predictive value for amyloid positivity (CSF or PET) in cognitively unimpaired people, stand-alone and in a two-step workflow cross-sectional study 2,916 As a stand-alone test, plasma p-tau217 achieved a positive predictive value (PPV) of 79% (95% CI, 74-84) and an overall accuracy of 81% (95% CI, 80-82). In a 2-step workflow, the PPV and accuracy significantly increased to 91% (95% CI, 86-95). While this approach required screening of 677 individuals with plasma p-tau217 to identify 100 Aβ-positive individuals, compared to 536 participants when using PET alone, it reduced the need for PET testing to 124 JAMA Neurology 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40952756
Blood biomarker test (p-tau217 / amyloid ratio) Care, carers and services Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for the test's accuracy against the reference standard; an accuracy result, not a health outcome. Combined plasma %p-tau217 and Aβ42/40 detected abnormal CSF amyloid status (AUC 0.949) and each predicted rising amyloid PET over time in people who started below the positivity threshold, replicated in two further cohorts; p-tau231 and GFAP added no clear independent value.

Prediction of subsequent brain amyloid accumulation (PET/CSF) in cognitively unimpaired people with subthreshold amyloid cohort study 983 a combination of plasma %p-tau217 and Aβ42/40 showed better performance (area under the curve = 0.949; 95% CI, 0.929-0.970; P <.02) than individual biomarkers ... longitudinal Aβ-PET (%p-tau217: β = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48-0.87; Aβ42/40: β = -0.33; 95% CI, -0.51 to -0.15; %p-tau217 × Aβ42/40: β = -0.31; 95% CI, -0.44 to -0.18; P < .001) JAMA Neurology 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39068669
Blood biomarkers (GFAP, NfL, p-tau217) for staging and prognosis Care, carers and services Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for the blood test's prognostic performance: plasma p-tau217 predicted cognitive decline and progression to MCI as well as tau PET (R2 0.33 vs 0.34; HR 1.57 vs 1.61), and using the blood test first cut the number needed to screen for a trial by 94%. A prognostic-performance result, not a health outcome.

Prediction of future cognitive decline and progression to MCI: plasma p-tau217 head-to-head with tau PET cohort study 1,474 plasma p-tau217 and medial temporal lobe tau-PET signal display similar associations with cognitive decline on a global cognitive composite test (R2PET = 0.34 versus R2plasma = 0.33, Pdifference = 0.653) and with progression to mild cognitive impairment (hazard ratio (HR)PET = 1.61 (1.48-1.76) versus HRplasma = 1.57 (1.43-1.72), Pdifference = 0.322) ... Sequential selection using plasma phosphorylated tau at threonine 217 (p-tau217) and then tau-PET reduced the number of participants required for a clinical trial by 94%, compared to a 76% reduction when using plasma p-tau217 alone Nature Aging 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40155777
Cost-effectiveness of multidomain prevention programme Care, carers and services Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for value for money: the intervention was modelled as dominant, saving JPY 452,826 per person and adding 0.08 QALYs over 35 years, with sensitivity analyses described as confirming robustness. A model extrapolating an 18-month trial.

Lifetime costs and QALYs of the J-MINT multidomain intervention versus usual care (35-year model) modelling study not stated Over 35 years, J-MINT was projected to achieve cost savings of JPY 452,826 per person and a gain of 0.08 QALYs The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41478834
Coffee, tea and flavonoid-rich foods Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

The association was strongest at moderate intake rather than the highest.

Incident dementia over a median 36.8 years cohort study 131,821 HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.76-0.89) for highest vs lowest quartile of caffeinated coffee JAMA 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41661604
Coffee, tea and flavonoid-rich foods Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

882 cases across five quintiles and several interaction strata, so the subgroup estimates rest on small numbers.

Incident dementia over a mean 9.2 years cohort study 121,986 AHR 0.72 (95% CI 0.57-0.89) for highest vs lowest flavodiet quintile JAMA Network Open 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39292460
Dietary pattern (general) Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

The association is reported in people who already have elevated Alzheimer's blood markers, which is the point of the study.

Incident dementia over a mean 8.4 years cohort study 1,865 Dementia HR 0.71 (95% CI 0.58-0.88) per SD of anti-inflammatory diet adherence among participants with elevated p-tau217 JAMA Network Open 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42348207
Dietary pattern (general) Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for a healthier plant-based diet: higher overall and healthful plant-based diet scores were associated with lower dementia risk, while a higher unhealthful plant-based diet score was associated with higher risk (pooled HR 1.42).

Incident dementia by plant-based diet index (overall, healthful and unhealthful) meta-analysis 207,981 higher scores in PDI and hPDI were associated with lower risk of dementia (highest vs. lowest tertile: pooled HR for PDI = 0.70, 95% CI, 0.53-0.92, p for trend <0.001; pooled HR for hPDI = 0.71, 0.48-1.06, p for trend = 0.03) ... higher uPDI was associated with higher dementia risk (highest vs. lowest tertile: pooled HR = 1.42, 1.19-1.70, p for trend <0.001). In the meta-analysis, individuals in the highest hPDI tertile had 21% lower dementia risk, and those in the highest uPDI tertile had 24% higher risk The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41564649
Dietary pattern (general) Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

Independent of overall diet quality. Substituting olive oil for margarine or mayonnaise was also associated with lower risk; substituting for butter or other vegetable oils was not.

Dementia-related death over 28 years cohort study 92,383 HR 0.72 (95% CI 0.64-0.81) for dementia-related death with ≥7 g/day olive oil vs never/rarely JAMA Network Open 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38709531
Dietary pattern (general) Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

Pooled observational studies only.

Dementia and Alzheimer's disease meta-analysis 65,955 Pooled OR 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.94) for dementia; cohort HR 0.84 (0.76-0.94); Alzheimer's OR 0.73 (0.62-0.85) Aging Clinical and Experimental Research 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38519775
Dietary pattern (general) Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

Observational. Points the opposite way to the randomised MIND diet trial.

Incident dementia meta-analysis 224,049 HR 0.83 per 3-point MIND-score increment (95% CI 0.72-0.95); highest vs lowest tertile HR 0.83 (0.76-0.90) JAMA Psychiatry 2023
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 37133875
Dietary pattern (general) Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

Significant on one adherence score (MEDAS, HR 0.77) but not the other (PYRAMID, HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.73-1.02).

Incident dementia over a mean 9.1 years cohort study 60,298 HR 0.77 (95% CI 0.65-0.91) for highest vs lowest MEDAS tertile BMC Medicine 2023
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 36915130
Dietary pattern (general) Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

Controls declined while the olive-oil arm held steady; the nut arm fell between the two. Cognitive follow-up was available for 334 of 447 enrolled.

Global cognition composite at median 4.1 years randomised trial 447 Global cognition composite: +0.05 (95% CI -0.11 to 0.21) olive-oil arm vs -0.38 (-0.57 to -0.18) control; P=0.005 JAMA Internal Medicine 2015
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 25961184
MIND diet Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

Observational. Points the opposite way to the randomised MIND diet trial.

Incident dementia meta-analysis 224,049 HR 0.83 per 3-point MIND-score increment (95% CI 0.72-0.95); highest vs lowest tertile HR 0.83 (0.76-0.90) JAMA Psychiatry 2023
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 37133875
Mediterranean diet Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

Pooled observational studies only.

Dementia and Alzheimer's disease meta-analysis 65,955 Pooled OR 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.94) for dementia; cohort HR 0.84 (0.76-0.94); Alzheimer's OR 0.73 (0.62-0.85) Aging Clinical and Experimental Research 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38519775
Mediterranean diet Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

Significant on one adherence score (MEDAS, HR 0.77) but not the other (PYRAMID, HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.73-1.02).

Incident dementia over a mean 9.1 years cohort study 60,298 HR 0.77 (95% CI 0.65-0.91) for highest vs lowest MEDAS tertile BMC Medicine 2023
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 36915130
Mediterranean diet Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

Controls declined while the olive-oil arm held steady; the nut arm fell between the two. Cognitive follow-up was available for 334 of 447 enrolled.

Global cognition composite at median 4.1 years randomised trial 447 Global cognition composite: +0.05 (95% CI -0.11 to 0.21) olive-oil arm vs -0.38 (-0.57 to -0.18) control; P=0.005 JAMA Internal Medicine 2015
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 25961184
Omega-3 / fish and fish oil Diet and supplements Prevention Benefit
why

Dietary intake and blood levels, pooled from observational cohorts. The much larger supplement estimate (HR 0.36) comes from one cohort's self-selected supplement users, not from a trial.

All-cause dementia or cognitive decline meta-analysis 103,651 Dietary DHA intake RR 0.82 for dementia or cognitive decline; ADNI supplement users HR 0.36 (95% CI 0.18-0.72) for Alzheimer's American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2023
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 37028557
Multidomain lifestyle intervention Exercise and activity Prevention Benefit
why

Compared with flexible health advice, not with nothing; both groups improved.

Global cognitive composite (SD per year) over 2 years randomised trial 1,065 Between-group difference in global cognitive composite 0.11 SD per year (95% CI 0.06-0.15) The Lancet 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42442374
Multidomain lifestyle intervention Exercise and activity Prevention Benefit
why

Both groups improved; the structured programme improved more. The trial compares two active interventions, so there is no untreated comparison.

Global cognition (SD per year) over 2 years randomised trial 2,111 Structured 0.243 SD/year vs. self-guided 0.213 SD/year; difference 0.029 SD/year JAMA 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40720610
Multidomain lifestyle intervention Exercise and activity Prevention Benefit Neuropsychological test battery Z-score at 2 years randomised trial 1,260 NTB Z-score change 0.20 (intervention) vs. 0.16 (control); annual between-group difference 0.022 The Lancet 2015
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 25771249
Physical activity (general / dose) Exercise and activity Prevention Benefit
why

Concentrating activity into one or two days worked about as well as spreading it across the week.

Incident dementia cohort study 91,512 HR 0.73 (95% CI 0.60-0.89) for >300 min/week concentrated in 1-2 days vs <150 min/week Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40514301
Physical activity (general / dose) Exercise and activity Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for 12 weeks of cycle-ergometer exercise: putative glymphatic influx in the putamen and meningeal lymphatic vessel size and flow increased, and inflammation-related plasma proteins fell in step with the imaging changes. A mechanistic imaging result, not a cognitive outcome.

MRI measures of glymphatic influx and meningeal lymphatic vessel size and flow, and plasma inflammatory proteins, after 12 weeks of cycling in healthy volunteers cohort study not stated not established — pubmed abstract reports no numeric effect size. Nature Communications 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40204790
Physical activity (general / dose) Exercise and activity Prevention Benefit
why

The authors call the association weak (RR 0.97), and it was absent beyond 10 years of follow-up.

Cognitive impairment or decline meta-analysis 341,471 Pooled RR 0.97 (95% CI 0.97-0.99) for cognitive impairment/decline; no association beyond 10 years of follow-up JAMA Network Open 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38300618
Physical activity (general / dose) Exercise and activity Prevention Benefit
why

Pooled across 29 cohorts. The association weakened to HR 0.85 after maximal confounder adjustment and was not significant for low-intensity activity.

Incident Alzheimer's disease meta-analysis 2,068,519 Pooled HR 0.72 (95% CI 0.65-0.80) overall; HR 0.85 (95% CI 0.79-0.91) after maximal confounder adjustment; high-intensity activity HR 0.56 (95% CI 0.45-0.68); moderate-intensity HR 0.85 (95% CI 0.80-0.93); low-intensity HR 0.94 (95% CI 0.77-1.15, not significant) Ageing Research Reviews 2023
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 37979700
Physical activity (general / dose) Exercise and activity Prevention Benefit
why

The authors state the association held in longer follow-ups, which is their answer to the reverse-causation objection raised by the Whitehall II cohort.

Incident all-cause dementia and Alzheimer's disease meta-analysis 257,983 Pooled RR 0.80 (95% CI 0.77-0.84) for all-cause dementia British Journal of Sports Medicine 2022
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 35301183
Physical activity (general / dose) Exercise and activity Prevention Benefit
why

866 cases over a short follow-up for a disease with a long prodrome, so some of the association may be people already declining moving less.

Incident all-cause dementia over a median 6.9 years cohort study 78,430 HR 0.49 (95% CI 0.39-0.62) at 9,826 steps/day vs lowest activity JAMA Neurology 2022
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 36066874
Physical activity (general / dose) Exercise and activity Prevention Benefit
why

The largest effect for physical activity anywhere in this table by a wide margin. On 678 cases over 6.3 years, in a disease with a long prodrome, reverse causation is the more likely explanation for an effect that size.

Incident dementia over a median 6.3 years cohort study 84,854 Trend across MVPA categories HR 0.66 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.70). "The lowest risk was identified in individuals who performed more than 1200 MET/min/week, those who had 84% (95% CI 0.12 to 0.21) lower risk of incident dementia compared to those who performed < 300 MET/min/week." BMC Medicine 2021
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 34852818
Resistance training Exercise and activity Prevention Benefit
why

The authors call the effect small (-0.18 points). Significant in women, not in men, on 91 randomised and 76 completing.

ADAS-Cog-Plus at 12 months randomised trial 91 ADAS-Cog-Plus mean difference -0.18 (95% CI -0.35 to -0.01; P=0.04) Alzheimer's & Dementia 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41795685
Resistance training Exercise and activity Prevention Benefit
why

Seven small trials; working memory did not improve (P=0.14).

General cognitive function and executive function meta-analysis not stated General cognition SMD 0.53 (P=0.04); executive function SMD 0.50 (P=0.0003) International Journal of Sports Medicine 2020
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 32599643
APOE genotype Genes (not modifiable) Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for carrying the deletion, present in 60% of African American ε4 homozygotes: it reduced the AD odds ratio and delayed onset in ε4/ε4 cases with local African ancestry at APOE, confirmed in All of Us, and it abolishes SPI1 repression at the site.

AD odds and age at onset in APOE ε4/ε4 carriers with versus without a 19 bp APOE enhancer deletion (African Americans) case-control study not stated not established — the abstract states the deletion reduces the ad odds ratio and delays onset but prints no figure; only the 60% carrier frequency is given. Nature Communications 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41629326
APOE genotype Genes (not modifiable) Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for carrying APOE2, which is associated with longer life irrespective of Alzheimer's status. The lifespan figures come from gene-targeted mice, not from the human cohort.

Lifespan / survival cohort study 24,661 Mice: "the median age at death was in the order of apoE2-TR (911 days) > apoE3 TR (825 days) > apoE4 TR (753 days) > Apoe KO (738 days)". In humans the abstract states only that "the association between APOE2 and longer lifespan persisted irrespective of AD status", without a numeric estimate. eLife 2020
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 33074098
Rare protective or risk variant (APOE3 Christchurch, APOE R145C, RELN, FN1) Genes (not modifiable) Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for one copy of the APOE3 Christchurch variant: median onset of cognitive impairment at 52 versus 47 years in matched PSEN1 E280A carriers without it, with preserved brain metabolism and fewer vascular amyloid features in the few imaged or autopsied. Not modifiable.

Age at onset of cognitive impairment in PSEN1 E280A carriers cohort study 1,077 the median age at the onset of cognitive impairment was 52 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 51 to 58), in contrast to a matched group of PSEN1 E280A carriers without the APOE3 Ch variant, among whom the median age at the onset was 47 years (95% CI, 47 to 49) New England Journal of Medicine 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38899694
Rare protective or risk variant (APOE3 Christchurch, APOE R145C, RELN, FN1) Genes (not modifiable) Prevention Benefit
why

Direction is for carrying the rare FN1 variant rs140926439 in APOE ε4 homozygotes: odds of AD 0.29 and onset delayed 3.37 years in the 7185-person validation cohort, with zebrafish work suggesting fibronectin loss of function reduces gliosis. Not modifiable.

Alzheimer's disease case status and age at onset among APOE ε4 homozygotes case-control study 7,185 rs140926439 variant in FN1 was protective of AD (OR = 0.29; 95% CI [0.11, 0.78], P = 0.014) and delayed age at onset of disease by 3.37 years (95% CI [0.42, 6.32], P = 0.025) Acta Neuropathologica 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38598053
Hearing loss / hearing aids Hearing and vision Prevention Benefit
why

Confined to people who said the aid actually improved their hearing (HR 0.86); those reporting poor improvement showed nothing (HR 0.98).

Probable dementia over a mean 6.5 years cohort study 61,089 HR 0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.94) for hearing aid use; HR 0.86 (0.80-0.93) with effective use Cell Reports Medicine 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 42127901
Hearing loss / hearing aids Hearing and vision Prevention Benefit
why

Mostly observational (25 of 31 studies), so people who take up hearing aids may differ from those who do not. The authors call for randomised trials — and ACHIEVE, the trial that followed, was null overall.

Long-term cognitive decline meta-analysis 137,484 HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.76-0.87) for cognitive decline with hearing aid use JAMA Neurology 2023
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 36469314
Vision impairment / cataract surgery Hearing and vision Prevention Benefit
why

Against untreated cataract. People who had surgery ended up at about the same risk as controls who never had cataracts (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.66-1.06), and there was no short-term gain in those already cognitively impaired.

Long-term cognitive decline / dementia meta-analysis 558,276 HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.72-0.78) for cognitive decline with surgery Ophthalmology 2024
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 38336283
Herpes zoster / shingles vaccination Infection and vaccination Prevention Benefit New dementia diagnoses over 5.5 years cohort study 232,124 -2.0 percentage points (95% CI -3.5 to -0.4) absolute reduction in new dementia diagnoses over 5.5 years The Lancet Neurology 2026
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41579903
Herpes zoster / shingles vaccination Infection and vaccination Prevention Benefit
why

Regression discontinuity across a birth-date eligibility threshold, which makes confounding by health-seeking behaviour less likely than in a plain cohort comparison. Eligibility did not change uptake of other preventive services or other chronic-disease diagnoses, which is the check that makes the design convincing.

New dementia diagnoses over 7.4 years cohort study 101,219 "eligibility for HZ vaccination (ie, being born shortly after vs shortly before November 2, 1936) decreased the probability of receiving a new dementia diagnosis during 7.4 years by 1.8 percentage points (95% CI, 0.4-3.3 percentage points; P = .01)"; vaccination uptake rose 16.4 percentage points (95% CI 13.2-19.5) across the threshold JAMA 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40267506
Herpes zoster / shingles vaccination Infection and vaccination Prevention Benefit
why

Regression discontinuity across the 2 September 1933 eligibility threshold; stronger in women than men.

Probability of a new dementia diagnosis over 7 years cohort study not stated -3.5 percentage points (95% CI 0.6 to 7.1, P = 0.019) in 7-year dementia diagnosis probability; 20.0% relative reduction (95% CI 6.5-33.4) Nature 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 40175543
Other vaccination (influenza, pneumococcal, general) Infection and vaccination Prevention Benefit
why

Pooled observational studies, so open to the confounding the natural-experiment studies were designed to avoid.

Any dementia meta-analysis 104,031,186 Influenza vaccination RR 0.87 (95% CI 0.77-0.99) for any dementia; pneumococcal vaccination RR 0.64 (95% CI 0.47-0.87) for Alzheimer's disease Age and Ageing 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 41269248
Antihypertensives / BP lowering Medicines Prevention Benefit
why

Significant for MCI and for the MCI-or-dementia composite; not significant for probable dementia alone (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.72-1.02).

MCI and probable dementia over median 7 years randomised trial 9,361 Probable dementia: 8.5 vs. 10.2 per 1,000 person-years (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.72-1.02); MCI: HR 0.87 (95% CI 0.76-1.00); composite MCI-or-dementia: HR 0.89 (95% CI 0.79-0.99) Neurology 2025
✓ Peer-reviewed PMID 39819096

Show all 64 rows (50 shown so far)

How this table was built, and where it is weak →